Orthogonal polynomial regression for the detection of response variability in event-related fMRI

NeuroImage

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 344-363

  Clark, Vincent P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT HEALTH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; BRAIN REGION; CINGULATE GYRUS; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LIMBIC CORTEX; MALE; MULTIPLE REGRESSION; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION;

EID: 0036741278     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1100     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Bandettini, P. A., Kwong, K. K., Davis, T. L., Tootell, R. B., Wong, E. C., Fox, P. T., Belliveau, J. W., Weisskoff, R. M., and Rosen, B. R. 1997. Characterization of cerebral blood oxygenation and flow changes during prolonged brain activation. Hum. Brain Mapp. 5(2): 93-109.
2. Baudena, P., Halgren, E., Heit, G., and Clarke, J. M. 1995. Intracerebral potentials to rare target and distractor auditory and visual stimuli. III. Frontal cortex. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 94: 251-264.
3. Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Gray, J. R., Molfese, D. L., and Snyder, A. 2001. Anterior cingulate cortex and response conflict: Effects of frequency, inhibition and errors. Cereb. Cortex. 9: 825-836.
4. Brown, W. S., Marsh, J. T., and LaRue, A. 1983. Exponential electrophysiological aging: P3 latency. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 55(3): 277-285.
5. Buchel, C., Holmes, A. P., Rees, G., and Friston, K. J. 1998a. Characterizing stimulus-response functions using nonlinear regressors in parametric fMRI experiments. Neuroimage 8(2): 140-148.
6. Buchel, C., Morris, J., Dolan, R. J., and Friston, K. J. 1998b. Brain systems mediating aversive conditioning: An event-related fMRI study. Neuron 20(5): 947-957.
7. Calhoun, V. D., Adali, T., McGinty, V. B., Pekar, J. J., Watson, T. D., and Pearlson, G. D. 2001. fMRI Activation in a visual-perception task: Network of areas detected using the general linear model and independent components analysis. NeuroImage 14: 1080-1088.
8. Callicott, J. H., Mattay, V. S., Bertolino, A., Finn, K., Coppola, R., Frank, J. A., Goldberg, T. E., and Weinberger, D. R. 1999. Physiological characteristics of capacity constraints in working memory as revealed by functional MRI. Cereb. Cortex 9(1): 20-26.
9. Carel, C., Loubinoux, I., Boulanouar, K., Manelfe, C., Rascol, O., Celsis, P., and Chollet, F. 2000. Neural substrate for the effects of passive training on sensorimotor cortical representation: A study with functional magnetic resonance imaging in healthy subjects. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 20(3): 478-484.
10. Casey, B. J., Forman, S. D., Franzen, P., Berkowitz, A., Braver, T. S., Nystrom, L. E., Thomas, K. M., and Noll, D. C. 2001. Sensitivity of prefrontal cortex to changes in target probability: A functional MRI study. Hum. Brain Mapp. 13(1): 26-33.
11. Clark, V. P., Fan, S., and Hillyard, S. A. 1995. Identification of early visual evoked potential generators by retinotopic and topographic analyses. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2: 170-187.
12. Clark, V. P., Fannon, S., Lai, S., and Benson, R. 2001. Paradigm-dependent modulation of event-related fMRI activity evoked by the oddball task. Hum. Brain Mapp. 14(2): 116-127.
13. Clark, V. P., Fannon, S., Lai, S., Benson, R., and Bauer, L. 2000. Responses to rare visual target and distractor stimuli using event-related fMRI. J. Neurophysiol. 83(5): 3133-3139.
14. Clark, V. P., Keil, K., Maisog, J. Ma., Courtney, S. M., Ungerleider, L. G., and Haxby, J. V. 1996. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of human visual cortex during face matching: A comparison with positron emission tomography. NeuroImage 4(1): 1-15.
15. Condon, B., McFadzean, R., Hadley, D. M., Bradnam, M. S., and Shahani, U. 1997. Habituation-like effects cause a significant decrease in response in MRI neuroactivation during visual stimulation. Vision Res. 37(9): 1243-1247.
16. Constable, R. T., and Spencer, D. D. 1999. Composite image formation in Z-shimmed functional MR imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 42(1): 110-117.
17. Dale, A. M., and Halgren, E. 2001. Spatiotemporal mapping of brain activity by integration of multiple imaging modalities. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 11(2): 202-208.
18. Friston, K. J. 1994. Statistical parametric mapping. In Functional Neuroimaging (R. W. Thatcher, M. Hallett, T. Zeffiro, E. R. John, and M. Huerta, Eds.), pp. 79-93. Academic Press, San Diego.
19. Friston, K. J., Holmes, A. P., Poline, J. B., Grasby, P. J., Williams, S. C., Frackowiak, R. S., and Turner, R. 1995. Analysis of fMRI time-series revisited. Neuroimage 2(1): 45-53.
20. Friston, K. J., Holmes, A. P., Worsley, K. P., Poline, J.-B., Frith, C. D., and Frackowiak, R. S. J. 1995b. Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2: 189-210.
21. Friston, K. J., Worsley, K., Frackowiak, R. S. J., Mazziotta, J. C., and Evans, A. C. 1994. Assessing the significance of focal activations using their spatial extent. Hum. Brain Mapp. 1: 210-220.
22. Gaillard, J. M. 1987. EEG fitting: A new method for numerical analysis of EEG. Neuropsychobiology 17(1-2): 9-14.
23. Halgren, E., Baudena, P., Clarke, J. M., Heit, G., Liegeois, C., Chauvel, P., and Musolino, A. 1995a. Intracerebral potentials to rare target and distractor auditory and visual stimuli. I. Superior temporal plane and parietal lobe. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 94(3): 191-220.
24. Halgren, E., Baudena, P., Clarke, J. M., Heit, G., Marinkovic, K., Devaux, B., Vignal, J. P., and Biraben, A. 1995b. Intracerebral potentials to rare target and distractor auditory and visual stimuli. II. Medial, lateral and posterior temporal lobe. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 94(4): 229-250.
25. Halgren, E., Marinkovic, K., Chauvel, P. 1998. Generators of the late cognitive potentials in auditory and visual oddball tasks. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 106(2): 156-164.
26. Herrmann, C. S., and Knight, R. T. 2001. Mechanisms of human attention: Event-related potentials and oscillations. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 25(6): 465-476.
27. Holmes, A. P., Josephs, O., Buchel, C., and Friston, K. J. 1997. Statistical modeling of low-frequency confounds in fMRI. Neuroimage 5: S480.
28. Huettel, S. A., and McCarthy, G. 2000a. Evidence for a refractory period in the hemodynamic response to visual stimuli as measured by MRI. Neuroimage 11(5, Part 1): 547-553.
29. Huettel, S. A., and McCarthy, G. 2000b. Regional differences in the refractory period of the fMRI hemodynamic response evoked by faces. Cogn. Neurosci. Soc. Abstracts (suppl.), 126.
30. Karayanidis, F., Robaey, P., Bourassa, M., De Koning, D., Geoffroy, G., and Pelletier, G. 2000. ERP differences in visual attention processing between attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and control boys in the absence of performance differences. Psychophysiology 37(3): 319-333.
31. Karni, A., Meyer, G., Jezzard, P., Adams, M. M., Turner, R., and Ungerleider, L. G. 1995. Functional MRI evidence for adult motor cortex plasticity during motor skill learning. Nature 377(6545): 155-158.
32. Kenemans, J. L., Verbaten, M. N., Melis, C. J., and Slangen, J. L. 1992. Visual stimulus change and the orienting reaction: Event-related potential evidence for a two-stage process. Biol. Psychol. 33(2-3): 97-114.
33. Keppel, G. 1982. Design and analysis: A Researcher's Handbook (G. Keppel, Ed.), 2nd ed. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
34. Kiehl, K. A., Laurens, K. R., Duty, T. L., Forster, B. B., and Liddle, P. F. 2001b. Neural sources involved in auditory target detection and novelty processing: An event-related fMRI study. Psychophysiology 38: 133-142.
35. Kiehl, K. A., Liddle, P. F. 2001a. An event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study of an auditory oddball task in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Res. 48 (n2-3): 159-171.
36. Kirino, E., Belger, A., Goldman-Rakic, P., and McCarthy, G. 2000. Prefrontal activation evoked by infrequent target and novel stimuli in a visual target detection task: An event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J. Neurosci. 20(17): 6612-6618.
37. Knight, R. T. 1984. Decreased response to novel stimuli after prefrontal lesions in man. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 59(1):9-20.
38. Knight, R. T., and Nakada, T. 1998. Cortico-limbic circuits and novelty: A review of EEG and blood flow data. Rev. Neurosci. 9(1): 57-70.
39. Lancaster, J. L., Woldorff, M. G., Parsons, L. M., Liotti, M., Freitas, C. S., Rainey, L, Kochunov, P. V., Nickerson, D., Mikiten, S. A., and Fox, P. T. 2000. Automated Talairach Atlas labels for functional brain mapping. Hum. Brain Mapp. 10: 120-131.
40. Linden, D. E., Prvulovic, D., Formisano, E., Vollinger, M., Zanella, F. E., Goebel, R., and Dierks, T. 1999. The functional neuroanatomy of target detection: An fMRI study of visual and auditory oddball tasks. Cerebral Cortex 9(8): 815-823.
41. Maisog, J. Ma., Clark, V. P., Courtney, S., and Haxby, J. V. 1995. Estimating the hemodynamic response and effective degrees of freedom in functional MRI time series. Presented at the First International Conference on Functional Mapping of the Human Brain. Hum. Brain Mapp. Suppl. 1: 147.
42. Makeig, S., and Jung, T. P. 1996. Tonic, phasic, and transient EEG correlates of auditory awareness in drowsiness. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 4(1): 15-25.
43. Makeig, S., Jung, T.-P., and Sejnowski, T. J. 2000. Awareness during drowsiness: Dynamics and electrophysiological correlates. Can. J. Exp. Psychol. 54(4): 266-273.
44. Manoach, D. S., Schlaug, G., Siewert, B., Darby, D. G., Bly, B. M., Benfield, A., Edelman, R. R., and Warach, S. 1997. Prefrontal cortex fMRI signal changes are correlated with working memory load. Neuroreport 8(2): 545-549.
45. McCandliss, B. D., Bolger, D. J., and Schneider, W. 2000. Habituating visual features versus cognitive codes: An event-related fMRI study of abstract word representations in extrastriate cortex. Soc. Neurosci. Abstracts 26(1-2): Abstract No. 464.5.
46. McCarthy, G., Luby, M., Gore, J., and Goldman-Rakic, P. 1997. Infrequent events transiently activate human prefrontal and parietal cortex as measured by functional MRI. J. Neurophysiol. 77(3): 1630-1634.
47. Mehlsen J. 2000. Models of the venous system. Student Health Technol. Info. 71: 109-117.
48. Menon, V., Ford, J. M., Lim, K. O., Glover, G. H., and Pfefferbaum, A. 1997. Combined event-related fMRI and EEG evidence for temporal-parietal cortex activation during target detection. Neuroreport 8(14): 3029-3037.
49. Mesulam, M. M. 1981. A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect. Ann. Neurol. 10(4): 309-325.
50. Miall, R. C., Reckess, G. Z., and Imamizu, H. 2001. The cerebellum coordinates eye and hand tracking movements. Nat. Neurosci. 4(6): 638-644.
51. Opitz, B., Mecklinger, A., Von Cramon, D. Y., and Kruggel, F. 1999. Combining electrophysiological and hemodynamic measures of the auditory oddball. Psychophysiology 36(1): 142-147.
52. Polich, J. 1999. P300 in clinical applications. In Electroencephalography, Basic Principles, Clinical Applications, and Related Fields (E. Niedermeyer and F. Lopes da Silva, Eds.), pp. 1073-1091. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore.
53. Polich, J., and Kok, A. 1995. Cognitive and biological determinants of P300. Biol. Psychol. 41: 103-146.
54. Rothenberg, S. J., Poblano, A., and Schnaas, L. 2000. Brainstem auditory evoked response at five years and prenatal and postnatal blood lead. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 22(4): 503-510.
55. Siegel, R. M., and Read, H. L. 2001. Deterministic dynamics emerging from a cortical functional architecture. Neural Networks 14: 697-713.
56. Speckmann, E.-J., and Elger, C. E. 1999. Introduction to the neurophysiological basis of the EEG and DC potentials. In Electroencephalography, Basic Principles, Clinical Applications, and Related Fields (E. Niedermeyer and F. Lopes da Silva, Eds.), pp. 15-27. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore.
57. Stauder, J. E. A., Woestenburg, J. C., Hassainia, F., and Mottron, L. 1997. Orthogonal polynomial trend analysis helps interpreting abnormalities in event-related brain potentials in high functioning autism. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. 17th Annual Conference 2: 923-924.
58. Stevens, A. A., Skudlarski, P., Gatenby, J. C., and Gore, J. C. 2000. Event-related fMRI of auditory and visual oddball tasks. Magn. Reson. Imag. 18(5): 495-502.
59. Swick, D., and Knight, R. 1998. Cortical lesions and attention. In The Attentive Brain (R. Parasuraman, Ed.), pp. 143-162. MIT Press, Cambridge.
60. Woestenburg, J. C., Verbaten, M. N., Van Hees, H. H., and Slangen, J. L. 1983. Single trial ERP estimation in the frequency domain using orthogonal polynomial trend analysis (OPTA): Estimation of individual habituation. Biol. Psychol. 17: (n2-3): 173-191.
61. Worsley, K. J. 1994. Local maxima and the expected Euler characteristic of excursion sets of chi2, F and t fields. Adv. Appl. Probl. 26: 13-42.
62. Wright, C. I., Fischer, H., Whalen, P. J., McInerney, S. C., Shin, L. M., and Rauch, S. L. 2001. Differential prefrontal cortex and amygdala habituation to repeatedly presented emotional stimuli. Neuroreport 12(2): 379-383.
63. Yoshiura, T, Zhong, J., Shibata, D. K., Kwok, W. E., Shrier, D. A, Numaguchi, Y. 1999. Functional MRI study of auditory and visual oddball tasks. Neuroreport 10(8): 1683-1688.