Composite image formation in z-shimmed functional MR imaging

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 110-117

  Constable, R T ^a   Spencer, D D ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Field inhomogeneities; Functional brain; MR imaging; Susceptibility

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL ACTIVATION; EFFICIENCY; MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY;

ACTIVATION DETECTION; BLOOD OXYGENATION LEVEL DEPENDENT; FALSE POSITIVE RATES; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; INHOMOGENEITIES; MAGNETIC FIELD INHOMOGENEITIES; MR IMAGING; SPATIAL SENSITIVITY;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

ARTICLE; BRAIN MAPPING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO;

EID: 0032768601     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(199907)42:1<110::AID-MRM15>3.0.CO;2-3     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Ogawa S, Lee TM, Kay AR, Tank DW. Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990;87:9868-9872.
2. Ogawa S, Lee TM, Nayak AS, Glynn P. Oxygenation-sensitive contrast in magnetic resonance image of rodent brain at high magnetic fields. Magn Reson Med 1990;14:68-78.
3. Ojemann JG, Akbudak E, Snyder AZ, McKinstry RC, Raichle ME, Conturo TE. Anatomic localization and quantitative analysis of gradient refocused echo-planar fMRI susceptibility artifacts, Neuroimage 1997;6:156-167.
4. Boxerman JL, Hamberg LM, Rosen BR, Weisskoff RM. MR Contrast due to intravascular magnetic susceptibility perturbations. Magn Reson Med 1995;34:555-566.
5. Stables LA, Kennan RP, Gore JC. Asymmetric spin-echo imaging of magnetically inhomogeneous systems: theory, experiment, and numerical studies. Magn Reson Med 1998;40:432-442.
6. Cho ZH, Ro YM. Reduction of susceptibility artifact in gradient-echo imaging. Magn Reson Med 1992;23:193-200.
7. Ro YM, Cho ZH. Susceptibility magnetic resonance imaging using spectral decomposition. Magn Reson Med 1995;33:521-528.
8. Glover GH, Lai S. Reduction of susceptibility effects in BOLD fMRI using tailored RF pulses. In: Proceedings of the ISMRM Annual Meeting, 1998. p 298.
9. Chen N, Li L, Wyrwicz A. Optimized phase preparation and auto-shimming technique for gradient echo MRI. In: Proceedings of the ISMRM Annual Meeting, 1998. p 127.
10. Frahm J, Merboldt KD, Hanicke W. Direct flash MR imaging of magnetic field inhomogeneities by gradient compensation. Magn Reson Med 1988;6:474-480.
11. Ordidge RJ, Gorell JM, Deniau JC, Knight RA, Helpern JA. Assessment of relative brain iron concentrations using T2-weighted and T2*-weighted MRI at 3 Tesla. Magn Reson Med 1994;32:335-341.
12. Constable RT. Functional MRI using gradient echo EPI in the presence of large static field inhomogeneities. J Magn Reson Imaging 1995;5:746-752.
13. Yang QX, Dardzinski BJ, Li S, Smith MB. Multi-gradient echo with susceptibility inhomogeneity compensation (MGESIC): demonstration of fMRI in the olfactory cortex at 3.0T. Magn Reson Med 1997;37:331-335.
14. Yang QX, Williams GD, Demeure RJ, Mosher TJ, Smith MB. Removal of local field gradient artifacts in T2* weighted imaging at high fields by gradient echo slice excitation profile imaging. Magn Reson Med 1998;39: 402-409.
15. Frahm J, Merboldt KD, Hanicke W. Functional MRI of human brain activation at high spatial resolution. Magn Reson Med 1993;29:139-144.
16. Young IR, Cox IJ, Bryant DJ, Bydder GM. The benefits of increasing spatial resolution as a means of reducing artifacts due to field inhomogeneities. Magn Reson Imaging 1988;6:585-590.
17. Constable RT. Improved activation maps via the elimination of motion effects through time-domain mixing of the data in conventional gradient echo functional MRI. Magn Reson Med 1997;38:628-637.
18. Constable RT, Ni W, Mencl E, Pugh K, Fulbright R, Shaywitz S, Shaywitz B, Gore J, Shankweiler D. Activation response to semantic and syntactic anomalies: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 1998;7:S188.
19. Stern CE, Corkin S, Gonzalez RG, Guimaraes AR, Baker JR, Jennings PJ, Carr CA, Sugiura RM, Vedantham V, Rosen BR. The hippocampal formation participates in novel picture encoding: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93: 8660-8665.
20. Detre JA, Maccotta L, King D, Alsop DC, Glosser G, D'Esposito M, Zarahn E, Aguirre GK, French JA. Functional MRI lateralization of memory in temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurology 1998;50:928-932.
21. Brewer JB, Zhao Z, Desmond JE, Glover GH, Gabrieli JDE. Making memories: brain activity that predicts how well visual experience will be remembered. Science 1998;281:1185-1187.
22. Metz CE. Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin Nucl Med 1978;8:283-298.
23. Constable RT, Skudlarski P, Gore JC. An ROC approach for evaluating functional brain MR imaging and postprocessing protocols. Magn Reson Med 1995;34:57-64.
24. 0-field variations. Magn Reson Med 1995;34: 65-73.
25. Wedeen VJ, Weisskoff RM, Poncelet BP. MRI signal void due to in-plane motion is all-or-none. Magn Reson Med 1994;32:116-120.