Paradigm-dependent modulation of event-related fMRI activity evoked by the oddball task

Human Brain Mapping

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 116-127

  Clark, Vincent P ^a   Fannon, Sean ^a   Lai, Song ^a   Benson, Randall ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT HEALTH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Arousal; Attention; Brain mapping; Cognition; Event related potentials; Magnetic resonance imaging; Neuroimaging; Psychophysiology; Visual cortex

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN MAPPING; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EVOKED RESPONSE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ORBITAL CORTEX; PARIETAL LOBE; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBROVASCULAR CIRCULATION; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MOVEMENT; NERVE NET; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

EID: 0034804452     PISSN: 10659471     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.1046     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bandettini PA, Cox RW (2000): Event-related fMRI contrast when using constant inter-stimulus interval: theory and experiment. Magn Reson Med 43:540-548.
2. Baudena P, Halgren E, Heit G, Clarke JM (1995): Intracerebral potentials to rare target and distractor auditory and visual stimuli. III. Frontal cortex. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 94:251-264.
3. Boynton, GM, Engel SA, Glover GH, Heeger DJ (1996): Linear systems analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging in human V1. J Neurosci 16:4207-4221.
4. Burock MA, Buckner RL, Woldorff MG, Rosen BR, Dale AM (1998): Randomized event-related experimental designs allow for extremely rapid presentation rates using functional MRI. Neuroreport 9:3735-3739.
5. Clark VP, Fannon S, Lai S, Benson R, Bauer L (2000):Responses to rare visual target and distractor stimuli using event-related fMRI. J Neurophysiol 83:3133-3139.
6. Clark VP, Maisog JMa, Haxby JV (1998): An fMRI study of face perception and memory using random stimulus sequences. J Neurophysiol 79:3257-3265.
7. Dale A, Buckner R (1997): Selective averaging of rapidly presented individual trials using fMRI. Hum Brain Mapp 5:329.
8. Dale AM (1999): Optimal experimental design for event-related fMRI. Hum Brain Mapp 8:109-114.
9. Donchin E (1981): Surprise!...Surprise? Psychophysiology 18:493-513.
10. Downar J, Crawley AP, Mikulis DJ, Davis KD (2000): A multimodal cortical network for the detection of changes in the sensory environment. Nat Neurosci 3:277-283.
11. Friston KJ, Holmes AP, Poline JB, Grasby PJ, Williams CR, Frackowiak RSJ (1995): Analysis of fMRI time-series revisited. Neuroimage 2:45-53.
12. Friston KJ, Worsley K, Frackowiak RSJ, Mazziotta JC, Evans AC (1994): Assessing the significance of focal activations using their spatial extent. Hum Brain Mapp 1:210-220.
13. Halgren E, Baudena P, Clarke JM, Heit G, Marinkovic K, Devaux B, Vignal JP, Biraben A (1995a): Intracerebral potentials to rare target and distractor auditory and visual stimuli. II. Medial, lateral and posterior temporal lobe. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 94:229-250.
14. Halgren E, Baudena P, Clarke JM, Heit G, Liegeois C, Chauvel P, Musolino A (1995b): Intracerebral potentials to rare target and distractor auditory and visual stimuli. I. Superior temporal plane and parietal lobe. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 94:191-220.
15. Helmholtz H von (1853): Uber einige Gesetze der Vertheilung electrischer Stome in korperlochen Leitern, mit Anwedung auf die thierisch-elektrischen Versuche. Annalen der Physik und Chemie 7:211-233, 353-377.
16. Kiehl KA, Laurens KR, Duty TL, Forster BB, Liddle PF (2001): Neural sources involved in auditory target detection and novelty processing: an event-related fMRI study. Psychophysiology 38: 133-142.
17. Kiehl KA, Liddle PF, Hopfinger JB (2000b): Error processing and the rostral anterior cingulate: an event-related fMRI study. Psychophysiology (in press).
18. Kirino E, Beiger A, Gore JC, Goldman-Rakic PS, McCarthy G (2000): A comparison of prefrontal activation to infrequent visual targets and non-target novel stimuli: a functional MRI study. Soc Neurosci Abstr 23:493.
19. Knight RT (1984): Decreased response to novel stimuli after prefrontal lesions in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 59:9-20.
20. Knight RT, Nakada T (1998): Cortico-limbic circuits and novelty: a review of EEG and blood flow data. Rev Neurosci 9:57-70.
21. Krystal JH, Beiger A, Kirino E, Madonick S, Gatenby C J, Gore JC, McCarthy G (1998): Modulation of cingulate activation to infrequent visual targets by ketamine: a functional MRI study. Soc Neurosci Abstr 24:259.
22. Linden DEJ, Prvulovic D, Formisano E, Vollinger M, Zanella FE, Goebel R, Dierks T (1999): The functional neuroanatomy of target detection: an fMRI study of visual and auditory oddball tasks. Cereb Cortex 9:815-824.
23. Lotze M, Erb M, Flor H, Huelsmann E, Godde B, Grodd W (2000): fMRI evaluation of somatotopic representation in human primary motor cortex. Neuroimage 11:473-481.
24. Loveless N. (1983): The orienting response and evoked potentials in man. In: Siddle D, editor. Orienting and habituation: perspectives in human research. New York: Wiley.
25. Maisog JMa, Clark VP, Courtney S, Haxby JV (1995): Estimating the hemodynamic response and effective degrees of freedom in functional MRI time series. Hum Brain Mapp 51:147.
26. Maldjian JA, Gottschalk A, Patel RS, Detre JA, Alsop DC (1999): The sensory somatotopic map of the human hand demonstrated at 4 Tesla. Neuroimage 10:55-62.
27. McCarthy G, Luby M, Gore J, Goldman-Rakic P (1997): Infrequent events transiently activate human prefrontal and parietal cortex as measured by functional MRI. J Neurophysiol 77:1630-1634.
28. Menon V, Ford JM, Lim KO, Glover GH, Pfefferbaum A (1997): Combined event-related fMRI and EEG evidence for temporal-parietal cortex activation during target detection. Neuroreport 8:3029-3037.
29. Opitz B, Mecklinger A, Von Cramon DY, Kruggel F (1999): Combining electrophysiological and hemodynamic measures of the auditory oddball. Psychophysiology 36:142-147.
30. Polich J (1998): P300 clinical utility and control of variability. J Clin Neurophysiol 15:14-33.
31. Polich J (1987): Response mode and P300 from auditory stimuli. Biol Psychol 25:61-71.
32. Polich J (1992): On the clinical application of P300. Biol Psychol 31:647-649.
33. Polich J, Kok A (1995): Cognitive and biological determinants of P300. Biol Psychol 41:103-146.
34. Pollmann S, Dove A, Yves von Cramon D, Wiggins CJ (2000): Event-related fMRI: comparison of conditions with varying BOLD overlap. Hum Brain Mapp 9:26-37.
35. Ritter W, Simson R, Vaughan HG Jr (1972): Association cortex potentials and reaction time in auditory discrimination. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 33:547-555.
36. Swick D, Knight R (1998): Cortical lesions and attention. In: Parasuraman R, editor. The attentive brain. Cambridge: MIT Press, p 143-162.
37. Turetsky BI, Raz J, Alsop D (1999): Functional magnetic resonance imaging of the sources of the auditory P300. Int J Psychophysiol 33:40.
38. Yoshiura T, Zhong J, Shibata DK, Kwok WE, Shrier DA, Numaguchi Y (1999): Functional MRI study of auditory and visual oddball tasks. Neuroreport 10:1683-1688.
39. Yue GH, Liu JZ, Siemionow V, Ranganathan VK, Ng TC, Sahgal V (2000): Brain activation during human finger extension and flexion movements. Brain Res 856:291-300.