|
Volumn 120, Issue 9, 2002, Pages 1162-1173
|
Can Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm Fast perimetry be used as an alternative to Goldmann perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic practice?
a a a |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
AGED;
ALGORITHM;
ARTICLE;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DISABILITY;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MALE;
MEDICAL EXAMINATION;
MEDICAL PRACTICE;
NEUROLOGIC DISEASE;
NEUROOPHTHALMOLOGY;
PERIMETRY;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
RATING SCALE;
RELIABILITY;
TASK PERFORMANCE;
VISION TEST;
VISUAL FIELD;
VISUAL FIELD DEFECT;
|
EID: 0036734629
PISSN: 00039950
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1001/archopht.120.9.1162 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (37)
|
References (26)
|