A comparison of tangent screen, goldmann, and humphrey perimetry in the detection and localization of occipital lesions

Ophthalmology

Volumn 107, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 527-544

  Wong, Agnes M F ^a   Sharpe, James A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN INFARCTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OCCIPITAL CORTEX; OCCIPITAL LOBE; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RELIABILITY; SCREENING TEST; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CEREBRAL INFARCTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OCCIPITAL LOBE; OPTIC CHIASM; PERIMETRY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PATHWAYS;

EID: 0034037359     PISSN: 01616420     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0161-6420(99)00092-5     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Katz J., Tielsch J.M., Quigley H.A., Sommer A. Automated perimetry detects visual field loss before manual Goldmann perimetry. Ophthalmology. 102:1995;21-26.
2. Trope G.E., Britton R. A comparison of Goldmann and Humphrey automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 71:1987;489-493.
3. Schmied U. Automated (Octopus) and manual (Goldmann) perimetry in glaucoma. Albrecht von Graefes Arch Exp Ophthalmol. 213:1980;239-244.
4. Keltner J.L., Johnson C.A. Automated and manual perimetry - a six-year overview. Special emphasis on neuro-ophthalmic problems. Ophthalmology. 91:1983;68-85.
5. Beck R.W., Bergstrom T.J., Lichter P.R. A clinical comparison of visual field testing with a new automated perimeter, the Humphrey Field Analyzer, and the Goldmann perimeter. Ophthalmology. 92:1985;77-82.
6. Tate GW Jr, Lynn JR. Principles of Quantitative Perimetry: Testing and Interpreting the Visual Field. New York: Grune & Stratton, Inc., 1977;130-44, 152-78.
7. Harrington D.O., Drake M.V. The Visual Fields Text and Atlas of Clinical Perimetry . 6th ed. 1990;Mosby, St. Louis.
8. Humphrey Field Analyzer Operator's Manual. San Leandro, CA: Allergan Humphrey, 1987; Section 3:1-36.
9. Choplin NT, Edwards RP. Visual Field Testing with the Humphrey Field Analyzer. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Inc, 1995.
10. Johnson C.A., Keltner J.L., Balestrery F.G. Suprathreshold static perimetry in glaucoma and other optic nerve disease. Ophthalmology. 86:1979;1278-1286.
11. McCrary J.A. III, Feigon J. Computerized perimetry in neuro-ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 86:1979;1287-1301.
12. Spalding J.M.K. Wounds of the visual pathway. Part II: The striate cortex . J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 15:1952;169-183.
13. Marino R. Jr, Rasmussen T. Visual field changes after temporal lobectomy in man. Neurology. 18:1968;825-835.
14. Van Buren J.M., Baldwin M. The architecture of the optic radiation in the temporal lobe of man. Brain. 81:1958;15-40.
15. Falconer M.A., Wilson J.L. Visual field changes following anterior temporal lobectomy their significance in relation to "Meyer's loop" of the optic radiation . Brain. 81:1958;1-14.
16. Harrington D.O. Visual field character in temporal and occipital lobe lesions. Arch Ophthalmol. 66:1961;778-792.
17. Harrington D.O. Localizing value of incongruity in defects in the visual fields. Arch Ophthalmol. 21:1939;453-464.
18. McAuley D.L., Russell R.W.R. Correlation of CAT scan and visual field defects in vascular lesions of the posterior visual pathways. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 42:1979;298-311.
19. Koerner F., Teuber H.L. Visual field defects after missile injuries to the geniculo-striate pathway in man. Exp Brain Res. 18:1973;88-113.
20. Shacklett D.E., O'Connor P.S., Dorwart R.H., et al. Congruous and incongruous sectoral visual field defects with lesions of the lateral geniculate nucleus. Am J Ophthalmol. 98:1984;283-290.
21. Luco C., Hoppe A., Schweitzer M., et al. Visual field defects in vascular lesions of the lateral geniculate body. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 55:1992;12-15.
22. Kölmel H.W. Homonymous paracentral scotomas. J Neurol. 235:1987;22-25.
23. Riddoch G. Dissociation of visual perception due to occipital injuries with special reference to appreciation of movement. Brain. 40:1917;15-57.
24. Safran A.B., Glaser J.S. Statokinetic dissociation in lesions of the anterior visual pathways; a reappraisal of the Riddoch phenomenon. Arch Ophthalmol. 98:1980;291-295.
25. Kaas J.H. Neurobiology. How cortex reorganizes. Nature. 375:1995;735-736.
26. Gilbert C.D., Wiesel T.N. Receptive field dynamics in adult primary visual cortex. Nature. 356:1992;150-152.
27. Pettet M.W., Gilbert C.D. Dynamic changes in receptive-field size in cat primary visual cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 89:1992;8366-8370.
28. Darian-Smith C., Gilbert C.D. Topographic reorganization in the striate cortex of the adult cat and monkey is cortically mediated. J Neurosci. 15:1995;1631-1647.
29. Safran A.B., Landis T. Plasticity in the adult visual cortex implications for the diagnosis of visual field defects and visual rehabilitation . Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 7:1996;53-64.
30. Gilbert C.D. Plasticity in visual perception and physiology. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 6:1996;269-274.
31. Keltner J.L., Johnson C.A. Short-wavelength automated perimetry in neuro-ophthalmologic disorders. Arch Ophthalmol. 113:1995;475-481.
32. Lindblom B., Hoyt W.F. High-pass resolution perimetry in neuro-ophthalmology. Clinical impressions. Ophthalmology. 99:1992;700-705.
33. Wall M., Montgomery E.B. Using motion perimetry to detect visual field defects in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension. A comparison with conventional automated perimetry. Neurology. 45:1995;1169-1175.
34. Johnson C.A., Samuels S.J. Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 38:1997;413-425.
35. Bengtsson B., Olsson J., Heijl A., Rootzen H. A new generation of algorithms for computerized threshold perimetry, SITA. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 75:1997;368-375.
36. Bengtsson B., Heijl A., Olsson J. Evaluation of a new threshold visual field strategy, SITA, in normal subjects. Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 76:1998;165-169.
37. Nordmann J.P., Brion F., Hamard P., Mouton-Chopin D. Evaluation des programmes périmétriques Humphrey SITA Standard et SITA Fast chez les patients normaux et glaucomateus [Eng. abstr.]. J Fr Ophtalmol. 21:1998;549-554.