Multiscale and Bayesian approaches to data analysis in genomics high-throughput screening

Current Opinion in Drug Discovery and Development

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 428-438

  Yang, Chihae ^a   Bakshi, Bhavik R ^b   Rathman, James F ^b   Blower Jr , Paul ^a  

^a Leadscope Inc   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian; Gene expression analysis; Genomics HTS; Multiscale; Wavelet transformation

Indexed keywords

COMPLEMENTARY DNA;

BAYES THEOREM; CELL LINE; DATA ANALYSIS; DNA MICROARRAY; DRUG DEVELOPMENT; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOMICS; REVIEW; SCREENING; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY TECHNIQUES; DRUG DESIGN; GENOMICS; HUMANS;

EID: 0036589829     PISSN: 13676733     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Hunter L, Taylor RC, Leach SM, Simon R: GEST: A gene expression search tool based on a novel Bayesian similarity metric. Bioinformatics (2001) 17(Suppl 1):S115-S122. An informative discussion of many important issues that need to be addressed to improve the analysis of gene expression data. Although the results comparing the proposed similarity metric to conventional methods are inconclusive, the model development and validation steps are very well done.
2. Baldi P, Long AD: A Bayesian framework for the analysis of microarray expression data: Regularized t-test and statistical inferences of gene changes. Bioinformatics (2001) 17:509-519. Detailed description of the development of a Bayesian model that includes much useful information about Bayesian statistics and its application to bioinformatics.
3. Eisen's Lab: Software. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA/University of California at Berkeley, CA, USA. http://rana.lbl.gov/EisenSoftware.htm
4. Clustering software. Stanford University, CA, USA. http://genome-www.stanford.edu/%7Esherlock/cluster.html
5. Genomics and Bioinformatics Group. National Cancer Institute/National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. http://discover.nci.nih.gov/
6. Hyvärinen A, Karhunen J, Oja E: Independent Component Analysis. Haykin S (Ed), John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York, NY, USA (2001).
7. Husmeier D, Wright F: A Bayesian approach to discriminate between alternative DNA sequence segmentations. Bioinformatics (2002) 18:226-234.
8. Webb BJM, Liu JS, Lawrence CE: BALSA: Bayesian algorithm for local sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Res (2002) 30:1268-1277.
9. Bustamante CD: Maximum likelihood and Bayesian methods for studying selection using DNA sequence data. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA (2001).
10. McGuire G, Denham MC, Balding DJ: MAC5: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees from DNA sequences incorporating gaps. Bioinformatics (2001) 17:479-480.
11. Holmes I, Bruno WJ: Evolutionary HMMs: A Bayesian approach to multiple alignment. Bioinformatics (2001) 17:803-820.
12. Li W: Delineating relative homogeneous G+C domains in DNA sequences. Gene (2001) 276:57-72.
13. Nielsen R, Wakeley J: Distinguishing migration from isolation: A Markov chain Monte Carlo approach. Genetics (2001) 158:885-896.
14. Crowley EM: A Bayesian method for finding regulatory segments in DNA. Biopolymers (2001) 58:165-174.
15. Dodin G, Vandergheynst P, Levoir P, Cordier C, Marcourt L: Fourier and wavelet transform analysis, a tool for visualizing regular patterns in DNA sequences. J Theor Biol (2000) 206:323-326.
16. Ameodo A, D'Aubenton-Carafa Y, Audit B, Bacry E, Muzy JF, Thermes C: What can we learn with wavelets about DNA sequences? Physica A (1998) 249:439-448.
17. Bacry E, Arneodo A, Graves PV, Muzy JF: A wavelet-based multifractal formalism application to the study of DNA sequences. J Tech Phys (1996) 37:281-284.
18. Duda RO, Hart PE, Stork DG (Eds): Pattern Classification, 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York, NY, USA (2001).
19. Baldi P, Brunak S (Eds): Bioinformatics, The Machine Learning Approach, 2nd Edition. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA (2001).
20. Shoemaker JS, Painter IS, Weir BS: Bayesian statistics in genetics: A guide for the uninitiated. Trends Genet (1999) 15:354-358. A good overview of the application of Bayesian statistics in genetics.
21. Liu JS, Lawrence CE: Bayesian inference on biopolymer models. Bioinformatics (1999) 15:38-52. Although not directly related to gene expression analysis, this article provides an excellent description of Bayesian inference in bioinformatics.
22. Khan J, Simon R, Bittner M, Chen Y, Leighton SB, Pohida T, Smith PD, Jiang Y, Gooden GC, Trent JM, Meltzer PS: Gene expression profiling of alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma with cDNA microarrays. Cancer Res (1998) 58:5009-5013.
23. Lio P, Vannucci M: Finding pathogenicity islands and gene transfer events in genome data. Bioinformatics (2000) 16:932-940.
24. Morozov P, Sitnikova T, Churchill G, Ayala FJ, Rzhetsky A: A new method for characterizing replacement rate variation in molecular sequences. Application of the Fourier and wavelet models to Drosophila and mammalian proteins. Genetics (2000) 154:381-395.
25. Mallat SG: A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: The wavelet representation. IEEE T Pattern Anal (1989) 11:674-693.
26. Walczak B (Ed): Wavelets in Chemistry. Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (2000).
27. Scherf U, Ross DT, Waltham M, Smith LH, Lee JK, Tanabe L, Kohn KW, Reinhold WC, Myers TG, Andrews DT, Scudiero DA, Eisen MB, Sausville EA, Pommier Y, Botstein D, Brown PO, Weinstein JN: A gene expression database for the molecular pharmacology of cancer. Nature Genet (2000) 24:236-244.
28. Blower P, Yang C, Fligner M, Verducci J, Yu L, Richman S, Weinstein JN: Pharmacogenomics J (2002) in press.
29. Long AD, Mangalam HJ, Chan BYP, Tolled L, Hatfield GW, Baldi P: Improved statistical inference from DNA microarray data using analysis of variance and a Bayesian statistical framework. Analysis of global gene expression in Escherichia coli K12. J Biol Chem (2001) 276:19937-19944. This study is closely related to reference [2••] but with less emphasis on statistical details.
30. Theilhaber J, Bushnell S, Jackson A, Fuchs R: Bayesian estimation of fold-changes in the analysis of gene expression: The PFOLD algorithm. J Comput Biol (2001) 8:585-614. An excellent paper that presents a systematic and detailed description of a new algorithm for estimating fold-changes. It also provides a very interesting overview of various experimental details that must be considered and how they can be incorporated. The development of a detailed noise model is presented, which is by itself a significant contribution.
31. Cyber-T. National Center for Genome Resources, Santa Fe, NM, USA.http://genomics.biochem.uci.edu/genex/cybert/
32. Arfin SM, Long AD, Ito ET, Tolleri L, Riehle MM, Paegle ES, Hatfield GW: Global gene expression profiling in Escherichia coli K12. The effects of integration host factor. J Biol Chem (2000) 275:29672-29684.
33. Friedman N, Linial M, Nachman I, Pe'er D: Using Bayesian networks to analyze expression data. J Comput Biol (2000) 7:601-620.
34. Ghosh D, Chinnaiyan AM: Mixture modelling of gene expression data from microarray experiments. Bioinformatics (2002) 18:275-286. An interesting paper in which mixture modeling, with a decision step based on Bayes factors, is used to determine the number of true clusters in the analysis of gene expression data.
35. West M, Blanchette C, Dressman H, Huang E, Ishida S, Spang R, Zuzan H, Olson JA Jr, Marks JR, Nevins JR: Predicting the clinical status of human breast cancer by using gene expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2001) 98:11462-11467.
36. Klevecz RR: Dynamic architecture of the yeast cell cycle uncovered by wavelet decomposition of expression microarray data. Funct Integr Genomics (2000) 1:186-192. A good example of application of wavelet transformation to time-series gene expression data.
37. Klevecz RR, Dowse HB: Tuning in the transcriptome: Basins of attraction in the yeast cell cycle. Cell Prolif (2000) 33:209-218.