Technology adoption as process: A case of integrating an information-intensive website into a patient education helpline

Behaviour and Information Technology

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 209-222

  Shelton, Brett E ^a   Turns, Jennifer ^a   Wagner, Tracey S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; HUMAN ENGINEERING; TEACHING; WEBSITES;

TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 0036558579     PISSN: 0144929X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0144929021000013509     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Al-Gahtani, S.S. and King, M. 1999, Attitudes, satisfaction and usage: Factors contributing to each in the acceptance of information technology. Behaviour and Information Technology, 18, 277-297.
2. Amabile, T.M. 1997, Motivating creativity in organizations: on doing what you love and loving what you do. California Management Review, 40, 39-58.
3. Baher, J. and Ma, J. 1999, Using case studies to evaluate learning technologies. In Annual Frontiers in Education Conference 'Designing the Future of Science and Engineering Education', San Juan, Puerto Rico, November 10-13, 1999.
4. Becker, H.S. 1990, Generalizing from case studies. In E. Eisner and A. Peshkin (eds) Qualitative inquiry in education: The continuing debate (New York, NY: Teachers College), pp. 233-242.
5. Becker, H.S. and Geer, B. 1969, Participant observation and interviewing: a comparison. In G.J. McCall and J.L. Simmons (eds) Issues in Participant Observation (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley). pp. 245-257.
6. Bijleveld, C.C.J.H., Andries, F. and Van Rijckevorsel, J.L.A. 2000, Positive and negative aspects of the work of information technology personnel: an exploratory analysis. Behaviour and Information Technology, 19, 125-138.
7. Blomberg, J., Suchman, L. and Trigg, R.H. (eds) 1997, Reflections on a work-oriented design project (Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.).
8. Brown, B. 2000, The artful use of groupware: an ethnographic study of how Lotus Notes is used in practice. Behaviour and Information Technology, 19, 263-173.
9. Bruner, J.S. 1960, The Progress of Education (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
10. Chin, G.J. and Carroll, J.M. 2000, Articulating collaboration in a learning community. Behaviour and Information Technology, 19, 233-246.
11. Cooper, B. and Brna, P. 2000, Classroom conundrums: the use of a participant design methodology, Educational Technology & Society, 3, 85-100.
12. Cuban, L. 1986, Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920 (New York: Teachers College Press).
13. Dourish, P. and Button, G. 1998, On 'technomethodology': foundational relationships between ethnomethodology and system design. Human-Computer Interaction, 13, 395-432.
14. Gasser, L. 1986, The integration of computing and routine work. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 4, 205-225.
15. Heath, C. and Luff, P. 2000, Technology in Action (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
16. Holloway, R.E. 1996, Diffusion and adoption of educational technology: a critique of research design. In D.H. Jonassen (ed.) Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology (New York: Simon and Schuster Macmillan), pp. 1107-1136.
17. Izsó, L. and Láng, E. 2000, Heart period variability as mental effort monitor in human computer interaction. Behaviour and Information Technology, 19, 297-306.
18. Lincoln, Y.S. and Guba, E.G. 1985, Naturalistic Inquiry (Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.).
19. Maisiak, R., Koplon, S. and Heck, L. 1989, Users of a public arthritis information service and their needs. The Journal of Rheumatology, 16, 1474-1479.
20. Matsen, F. 2000, The Arthritis Source, University of Washington Department of Orthopaedics and Bone and Joint Center. Available online: http://www.orthop.washington.edu/arthritis.
21. Monk, A. 1999, Modeling cyclic interaction. Behaviour and Information Technology, 18, 127-139.
22. Moshell, J.M. and Hughes, C.E. 1995, The virtual academy: A simulated environment for constructionist learning (Florida: University of Central Florida).
23. Noble, D.F. 1999, Digital diploma mills, part IV: Rehearsal for the revolution. Available online: http://www.pls.lib.ca.us/ smcccd/faculty/confer/noble4.htm.
24. Norman, D. (ed.) 1991, Cognitive Artifacts (Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press).
25. Oliver, M. 2000, An introduction to the evaluation of learning technology. Educational Technology & Society, 3, 20-30.
26. Pascale Carayon Department of Industrial Engineering 2000, Sociotechnical issues in the implementation of imaging technology. Behaviour and Information Technology, 19, 247 - 262.
27. Patton, M.Q. 1980, Qualitative interviewing. Qualitative Evaluation Methods (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage).
28. Paulsson, K. and Sundin, L. 2000, Learning at work-a combination of experience based learning and theoretical education. Behaviour and Information Technology, 19, 181-188.
29. Payton, P.W. 2000, Influences of the 'social contract', technology and restructuring, and training on the supply and demand for skilled technology workers. Behaviour and Information Technology, 19, 211-219.
30. Pea, R.D. 1993, Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In G. Salomon (ed.) Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (Berlin: Springer Verlag), pp. 347-361.
31. Scanlon, E., Jones, A., Barnard, J., Thompson, J. and Carter, J. 2000, Evaluating information and communication technologies for learning. Educational Technology & Society, 3, 101-107.
32. Shelley, J.O. 1998, Factors that affect the adoption and use of electronic mail by K-12 foreign language educators. Computers in Human Behavior, 14, 269-285.
33. Sheppard, S.D., Reamon, D., Friedlander, L., Kerns, C., Leifer, L., Marincovigh, M. and Toye, G. 1998, Assessment of technology-assisted learning in higher education: It requires new thinking by universities & colleges. In 28th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, Tempe, AZ. November 4-7, 1998.
34. Stevens, R.R. 2000, Divisions of labor in school and in the workplace: comparing computer and paper-supported activities across setting. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 373 - 401.
35. Suchman, L. 2000, Located accountabilities in technology production, Department of Sociology, Lancaster University. Available online: http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/ soc0391s.html.
36. Taylor, H.G. 1993, Foundations for restructuring through standards for information technology preparation programmes: National policy initiatives in the United States. In IFIP Transactions A: Computer Science and Technology, Open Conference on Informatics and Changes in Learning, Gmunden, Austria. June 7-11, 1993.
37. Te'eni, D. 1996, Teaching human-computer interaction in context: an illustrative lesson on Windows. Behaviour and Information Technology, 15, 101-112.
38. Turns, J. and Wagner, T.S. 2000, Arthritis Source - Work with the Arthritis Foundation Hotline. Technical Report PETTT, Program for Educational Transformation Through Technology, University of Washington.
39. Vanderheiden, G. and Tobias, J. 1998, Barriers, incentives and facilitators for adoption of universal design practices by consumer product manufacturers. In 42nd Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Chicago, IL. October 5-9, 1998.
40. Wagner, T.S. 2000, Arthritis Source: Arthritis Foundation Hotline characterization and summary report. Technical Report PETTT 00-AS-03, Program for Educational Transformation Through Technology, University of Washington.
41. White, S.H., Gupta, A., Grudin, J., Chesley, H., Kimberly, G., & Sanocki, E. 2000, Evolving use of a system for education at a distance. In: Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maul, HI. January 4-7, 2000.
42. Zdrahal, Z., Mulholland, P., Domingue, J. and Hatatla, M. 2000, Sharing engineering design knowledge in a distributed environment. Behaviour and Information Technology, 19, 189-200.