Evaluating information and communication technologies for learning

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 101-107

  Scanlon, Eileen ^a   Jones, Ann ^a   Barnard, Jane ^a   Thompson, Julie ^a   Calder, Judith ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Distance education; Evaluation framework; Further and higher education

Indexed keywords

EID: 0005103655     PISSN: 11763647     EISSN: 14364522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Breen, R., Jenkins, A., Lindsay, R. & Smith, P. (1998). Insights through triangulation. In Oliver, M. (Ed.) Innovation in the Evaluation of Learning Technology, London: University of North London, 151-168.
2. Brown, J. S., Collins, A. & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
3. Butcher, P. & Greenberg, J. M. (1991). Educational computing at the Open University: the next decade. Education and Computing, 8 (1), 201-215.
4. Calder, J. (1994). Course evaluation; improving academic quality and teaching effectiveness. In F. Lockwood (Ed.) Materials Production in Open and Distance Learning, London: Paul Chapman Publishing, 361-370.
5. Draper, S., Mc Atteer, E., Tolmie, A. & Anderson, A. (1994) Bringing a constructivist approach to bear on evaluation. In H. Foot, C. Howe, A. Anderson, A. Tolmie & D. Warden (Eds.) Group and Interactive Learning, Southampton: Computational Mechanics Publication, 31-36.
6. Draper, S., Brown, M., Henderson, F. & McAteer, E. (1997). Integrative Evaluation: an emerging role for classroom studies of CAL. Computers in Education, 26 (1-3), 17-32.
7. Draper, S., Brown, M., Edgerton, E., Henderson, F., McAteer, E., Smith, E. & Watt, H. (1994). Observing and Measuring the Performance of Educational Technology. TILT Report no. 1, Glasgow, UK: University of Glasgow.
8. Eisner, E. (1985). The Art of Educational Evaluation, London and Philadelphia: Falmer Press.
9. Higginson, G. (1996). Report of the Learning and Technology Committee, London: FEFC.
10. Her Majesty's Stationery Office (1998). The Learning Age: a renaissance for a New Britain, London: HMSO
11. Hooper, R. (1977). National Development Programme in Computer Assisted Learning: the final report of the Director, London: CET.
12. Jones, A., O'Shea, T. & Scanlon, E. (1987). Evaluation of computer assisted learning at the Open University. In Jones, A., Scanlon, E. & O'Shea, T. (Eds.) The Computer Revolution in Education. Brighton: Harvester Press, 263-276.
13. Jones, A., Scanlon, E. & Tosunoglu, C. (1998). Reflections on a model for evaluating learning technologies. In Oliver, M. (Ed.) Innovation in the Evaluation of Learning Technology, London: University of North London, 25-40.
14. Jones, A., Scanlon, E., Butcher, P., Murphy, P., Greenberg, J & Ross, S. (1999). Evaluating CAL: a distance education perspective. Interacting with Computers, 11, 499-516.
15. Jones, A., Scanlon, E., Butcher, P., Greenberg, J., Ross, S., Murphy, P & Tosunoglu, C. (1996). Evaluation of computer assisted learning at the Open University-fifteen years on. Computers and Education, 26 (1-3), 5-15.
16. Kandaswamy, S. (1990). Evaluation of instructional materials: a synthesis of and methods. Educational Technology, 20(1), 19-26.
17. Kemmis, S., Atkins, R. & Wright, E. (1977). How do students learn: the UNCAL Evaluation, occasional publication no 5, Norwich, UK: Centre for Applied Research in Education, University of East Anglia.
18. Mc Farlane, A. (1992). Teaching and learning in an expanding Higher Education System, Edinburgh: Committee of Scottish University Principals.
19. Oliver, M. (1999). A framework for the evaluation of learning technology, ELT Report No 1, London: University of North London.
20. Parlett, M. & Hamilton, D. (1972). Evaluation as illumination: a new approach to the study of innovatory programs. In D. Hamilton (Ed.) Beyond the numbers game: a reader in evaluation and learning, London: Macmillan, 6-22.
21. Ross, S. & Scanlon, E. (1995). Open science: the distance teaching and open learning of science subjects, London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
22. Scanlon, E., Jones, A., Butcher, P., Greenberg, J., Ross, S., Taylor, J., Murphy, P. & Tosunoglu, C. (1998). Learning with computers : experiences of evaluation. Computers and Education, 30 (1/2), 1-9.
23. Scriven, M. (1980). The methodology of evaluation. American Educational Research Association Series of Curriculum Evaluation, 1, 32-83.
24. Stake, R. E. (1967). The countenance of educational evaluation. Teachers' College Record, 68, 523-540.
25. Stufflebeam, D. (1971). Educational evaluation and decision making, Itasca, IL: F.E. Peacock Publishers.
26. Tosunoglu, C., Butcher, P., Scanlon, E. & Jones, A. (1996). The Works Metallurgist: an evaluation of a CAL package on phase diagrams. Association for Learning Technology Journal, 4 (1), 51-57.
27. Scanlon, E., Ross, S. & Tosunoglu, C. (1997). Simulating chaos: an evaluation of the driven pendulum experiment. Association for Learning Technology Journal, 5 (1), 60-65.
28. Taylor, J., Oliver, M. & Hatzipanagos S. (1995). The Galapagos Tutorial: a formative evaluation, Programme on Learner Use of Media, Report No 55, Milton Keynes, UK: Open University.
29. Taylor, J., Scanlon, E. & Hodgson, B. (1996). Multimedia and science education. Education Research and Perspectives, 23 (2), 48-58.
30. TLTP (1996). Evaluation of the Teaching and Learning Technology Programme, Final Report M21/96, Bristol: HEFCE.
31. Tyler, R. (1986). Another paradigm and a rationale. Changing concepts of educational evaluation, 10 (1), International Journal of Educational Research Monograph.