Format distortion and word reading: The role of multiletter units

Neurocase

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 31-36

  Dickerson, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Format distortion; Lexical access; Multiletter units; Neglect dyslexia

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL FEATURE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE DISABILITY; MALE; PHONETICS; READING; RIGHT HEMISPHERE;

EID: 0033008127     PISSN: 13554794     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/neucas/5.1.31     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Allen PA, Emerson PL. Holism revisited: evidence for parallel independent word level and letter level processes during word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1991; 17: 489-511.
2. Behrmann M, Moscovitch M, Black SE, Mozer M. Perceptual and conceptual mechanisms in neglect dyslexia. Brain 1990; 113: 1163-83.
3. Besner D, Johnstone JC. Reading and the mental lexicon: on the uptake of visual information. In: Marslen-Wilson W, editor. Lexical processes and representations. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1989: 291-316.
4. Caramazza A, Hillis AE. Levels of representation, co-ordinate frames and unilateral neglect. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1990; 7: 391-445.
5. Coltheart M. Deep dyslexia: a right hemisphere hypothesis. In: Coltheart M, Patterson KE, Marshall JC, editors. Deep dyslexia. Routledge, London. 1980: 327-406.
6. Coltheart M. Disorders of reading and their implications for models of normal reading. Visible Language 1981; 15: 245-86.
7. Coltheart M. Cognitive neuropsychology and the study of reading. In: Posner MI, Marin OS, editors. Attention and performance XI. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1985: 3-35.
8. Coltheart M. Functional architecture of the language processing system. In: Coltheart M, Sartori G, Job R, editors. The cognitive neuropsychology of language. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd, 1987: 1-24.
9. Coslett HB, Saffran EM. Preserved object recognition and reading comprehension in optic aphasia. Brain 1989; 112: 1091-110.
10. Coslett HB, Saffran EM. Mechanisms of implicit reading in alexia. In: Farah MJ, Ratcliff G, editors. The neuropsychology of high-level vision. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1994: 229-331.
11. Haber LR, Haber RN, Furlin KR. Word length and word shape as sources of information in reading. Reading Research Quarterly 1983; 18: 168-89.
12. Howard D. Reading without letters. In: Coltheart M, Sartori G, Job R, editors. The cognitive neuropsychology of language. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1987: 27-58.
13. Kay J, Marcel T. One process not two in reading aloud: lexical analogies do the work of non-lexical rules. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1981; 39A: 29-41.
14. Kay J, Lesser R, Coltheart M. PALPA: psycholinguistic assessment of language processing in adults. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1992.
15. Marr D. Vision. San Francisco: WH Freeman, 1980.
16. Marr D, Nishihara HK. Representation and recognition of the spatial organisation of three-dimensional objects. Proceedings of the Royal Society, London 1978; B200: 269-94.
17. Mayall K, Humphreys GW. Case mixing and the task sensitive disruption of lexical processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 1996; 22: 278-94.
18. McClelland JL, Rumelhart DL. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception. Psychological Review 1981; 88: 375-405.
19. Paap KR, Newsome SL, Noel RW. Word shapes in poor shape for the race to the lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1984; 10: 413-28.
20. Pring L. Phonological codes and functional spelling units: reality and implications. Perception and Psychophysics 1981; 30: 573-8.
21. Riddoch MJ, Humphreys GW. BORB: Birmingham object recognition battery. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1993.
22. Saffran EM, Marin OS. Reading without phonology: evidence from aphasia. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1977; 29: 515-25.
23. Schwartz, TH, Ojemann, GA, Dodrill, CB. Reading errors following right hemisphere injection of sodium amobarbital. Brain and Language 1997; 58: 70-91.
24. Snodgrass JG, Vanderwart MA. A standardised set of 260 pictures: norms of name agreement, image agreement, familiarity and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1980; 6: 174-215.
25. Whitely HE, Walker P. The activation of multiletter units in visual word recognition. Visual Cognition 1994; 1: 433-73.