Opposite effects on perception and action induced by the Ponzo illusion

Experimental Brain Research

Volumn 146, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 433-440

  Bartelt, Robert ^a   Darling, Warren G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

Grasping; Reaching; Vision

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY MOVEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; EYE HAND COORDINATION; FEMALE; HAND GRIP; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOTOR SYSTEM; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PONZO ILLUSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL ILLUSION; VISUAL INFORMATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0036389877     PISSN: 00144819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-002-1198-2     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Aglioti S, DeSouza JFX, Goodale MA (1995) Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Curr Biol 5:679-685
2. Brenner E, Smeets JBJ (1996) Size illusions influence how we lift but not how we grasp an object. Exp Brain Res 111:473-476
3. Coren S, Porac C (1987) Individual differences in visual-geometric illusions: predictions from measures of spatial cognitive abilities. Percept Psychophys 41:211-219
4. Daprati E, Gentilucci M (1997) Grasping an illusion. Neuropsychologia 35:1577-1582
5. Fischer MH (2001) How sensitive is hand transport to illusory context effects? Exp Brain Res 136:224-230
6. Franz VH, Gegenfurtner KR, Bultoff HH, Fahle M (2000) Grasping visual illusions: no evidence for a dissociation between perception and action. Psychol Sci 11:20-25
7. Franz VH, Gegenfurtner KR, Bultoff HH, Fahle M (2001) Effects of visual illusions on grasping. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 27:1124-1144
8. Gentilucci M, Chieffi S, Daprati E, Saetti MC, Toni I (1996) Visual illusion and action. Neuropsychologia 34:369-376
9. Glover S, Dixon P (2001) The role of vision in the on-line correction of illusion effects on action. Can J Exp Psychol 55:96-103
10. Goodale MA, Jakobson LS, Keillor JM (1994) Differences in the visual control of pantomimed and natural grasping movements. Neuropsychologia 32:1159-1178
11. Gregory RL (1990) Eye and brain: the psychology of seeing, 4th edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton
12. Haffenden AM, Goodale MA (1998) The effect of pictorial illusion on prehension and perception. J Cogn Neurosci 10:122-136
13. Haffenden AM, Goodale MA (2000) Independent effects of pictorial displays on perception and action. Vision Res 40:1597-1607
14. Haffenden AM, Schiff KC, Goodale MA (2001) The dissociation between perception and action in the Ebbinghaus illusion: nonillusory effects of pictorial cues on grasp. Curr Biol 11:177-181
15. Hanisch C, Konczak J, Dohle C (2001) The effect of the Ebbinghaus Illusion on grasping behavior of children. Exp Brain Res 137:237-245
16. Jackson SR, Shaw A (2000) The Ponzo illusion affects grip-force but not grip-aperture scaling during prehension movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 26:418-423
17. Johansson RS, Westling G (1988) Coordinated isometric muscle commands adequately and erroneously programmed for the weight during lifting task with precision grip. Exp Brain Res 71:59-71
18. Milner AD, Goodale MA (1995) The visual brain in action. Oxford University Press, Oxford
19. Pavani F, Boscagli I, Benvenuti F, Rabuffeti M, Farne A (1999) Are perception and action affected differently by the Titchener circles illusion? Exp Brain Res 127:95-101
20. Vishton PM, Rea JG, Cutting JE, Nunez LN (1999) Comparing the effects of the horizontal vertical illusion on grip scaling and judgment: relative versus absolute, not perception versus action. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 25:1659-1672
21. Westwood DA, Chapman CD, Roy EA (2000a) Pantomimed actions may be controlled by the ventral visual stream. Exp Brain Res 130:545-548
22. Westwood DA, Heath M, Roy EA (2000b) The effect of a pictorial illusion on closed-loop and open-loop prehension. Exp Brain Res 134:456-463
23. Westwood DA, McEachern T, Roy EA (2001) Delayed grasping of a Müller-Lyer figure. Exp Brain Res 141:166-173