![]() |
Volumn 23, Issue 7-8, 2002, Pages 1005-1012
|
Comparison of extraction methods for the recovery, amplification and species-specific analysis of DNA from bone and bone meals
a
a
a
a
b
b
|
Author keywords
Bone meals; DNA recovery; Extraction methods; Polymerase chain reaction
|
Indexed keywords
BONE;
CHAINS;
DNA;
EXTRACTION;
RECOVERY;
SILICA;
SODIUM DODECYL SULFATE;
SULFUR COMPOUNDS;
ANIMAL BONES;
BONE MEAL;
DIFFERENT TREATMENTS;
DNA RECOVERY;
ETHYLENE DIAMINE TETRA-ACETIC ACID;
EXTRACTION METHOD;
PRE-TREATMENTS;
PROTEINASE K;
SODIUM DODECYL SULPHATE;
SPECIES SPECIFICS;
POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION;
CYTOCHROME B;
DNA;
DODECYL SULFATE SODIUM;
EDETIC ACID;
ENDONUCLEASE;
PROTEINASE K;
RESIN;
SILICON DIOXIDE;
WATER;
ANIMAL TISSUE;
ARTICLE;
BONE;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
CULTURE MEDIUM;
DNA DETERMINATION;
DNA EXTRACTION;
GENE AMPLIFICATION;
HEATING;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
MITOCHONDRION;
NONHUMAN;
PARAMETER;
POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION;
PURIFICATION;
RESTRICTION FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM;
SAMPLE;
SPECIES DIFFERENCE;
SWINE;
TEMPERATURE;
TIME;
ULTRASOUND;
|
EID: 0036114892
PISSN: 01730835
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1002/1522-2683(200204)23:7/8<1005::AID-ELPS1005>3.0.CO;2-1 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (30)
|
References (35)
|