Mining capstone engineering experiences for program assessment results

International Journal of Engineering Education

Volumn 18, Issue 2 SPEC., 2002, Pages 193-198

  Shaeiwitz, Joseph A ^a  

^a West Virginia University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CAPSTONE ENGINEERING;

CURRICULA; EVALUATION; FEEDBACK; INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 0036005318     PISSN: 0949149X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. T.W. Banta, J.P. Lund, K.E. Black, and F.W. Oblander, Assessment in Practice, pp. 79-82. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA (1999).
2. T.W. Banta, J.P. Lund, K.E. Black, and F.W. Oblander, Assessment in Practice, pp. 82-86. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA (1999).
3. T.W. Banta, J.P. Lund, K.E. Black, and F.W. Oblander, Assessment in Practice, pp. 101-104. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA (1999).
4. T.W. Banta, J.P. Lund, K.E. Black, and F.W. Oblander, Assessment in Practice, pp. 135-138. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA (1999).
5. F. McMartin, A. McKenna, and K. Youssefi, Scenario assignments as assessment tools for undergraduate engineering education, IJEE Trans. Educ., 43(2), May 2000, pp. 111-119.
6. C.A. Palomba and T.W. Banta, Assessment Essentials, pp. 124-126. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA (1996).
7. B. Fong, Assessing the department major, in Assessing Students' Learning New Directions for Teaching and Learning, #34, (J.H. McMillan, ed.), pp. 71-83. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA (1988).
8. R.C. Bailie, J.A. Shaeiwitz, and W.B. Whiting, An integrated design sequence; sophomore and junior years, Chem. Eng. Educ., 28(1), Winter 1994, pp. 52-57.
9. D.E. Hirt, Integrating design throughout the ChE curriculum: lessons learned, Chem. Eng. Educ., 32(4), Fall 1998, pp. 290-295.
10. B.M. Olds and R.L. Miller, Using portfolios to assess a ChE program, Chem. Eng. Educ., 33(2), Spring 1999, pp. 110-114.
11. ABET, Criteria for Evaluating Engineering Programs, Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, 3/18/00 revision, available at http://www.abet.org/eac/2000.htm.
12. http://www.cemr.wvu.edu/̃wwwche/outcome/index.html.
13. N. Picket, Guidelines for Rubric Development. http://edweb.sdsu.edu/triton/july/rubrics/Rubric_Guidelines.html.
14. J.A. Shaeiwitz and R. Turton, Acetone production from isopropyl alcohol: an example debottlenecking problem and outcomes assessment tool, Chem. Eng. Educ., 33(3), Summer 1999, pp. 210-215.
15. J. Prus and R. Johnson, A critical review of student assessment options, in Assessment and Testing.' Myths and Realities New Directions for Community Colleges, # 88, (T.H. Bers and M.L. Miller, eds.), pp. 69-83, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA (1994).
16. D. DiBiasio, W. Clark, A. Dixon, and L. Comparini, The process of learning chemical engineering: what works and what doesn't, ASEE Annual Conference, St. Louis, MO, June 2000, Session 3513.
17. AAHE, Best assessment principles, American Association of Higher Education, reprinted in How Do You Measure Success? Designing Effective Processes for Assessing Engineering Education. p. 45, ASEE Professional Books (1998).
18. C. Walker and T. Angelo, A collective effort classroom assessment technique: promoting highperformance in student teams, in Classroom Assessment and Research: An Update on Uses, Approaches, and Research Findings New Directions for Teaching and Learning, #75, (T. Angelo, ed.) p. 101. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA (1998).
19. D.B. Kaufman, R.M. Felder, and H. Fuller, Accounting for individual effort in cooperative learning teams, J. Eng. Educ., 89(2), April 2000, pp. 133-140.