Phylogenetic relationships of Theaceae inferred from chloroplast DNA sequence data

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 88, Issue 12, 2001, Pages 2309-2320

  Prince, Linda M ^a,b   Parks, Clifford R ^b  

^a RANCHO SANTA ANA BOTANIC GARDEN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Classification; matK; Molecular phylogeny; rbcL; Theaceae; Theoideae

Indexed keywords

CAMELLIA; CAMELLIA SINENSIS; GORDONIA BRANDEGEEI; GORDONIA LASIANTHUS; LAPLACEA; LASIANTHUS; POLYSPORA; STEWARTIA; TERNSTROEMIACEAE; THEACEAE;

EID: 0000498018     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3558391     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. AIRY-SHAW, H. K. 1936. Notes on the genus Schima and on the classification of the Theaceae-Camellioideae. Kew Bulletin 1936: 496-499.
2. ALBERT, V. A., S. E. WILLIAMS, AND M. W. CHASE. 1992. Carnivorous plants: phylogeny and structural evolution. Science 257: 1491-1495.
3. ANDERBERG, A. A., B. STÅHL, AND M. KÄLLERSJÖ. 1998 Phylogenetic relationships in the Primulales inferred from rbcL sequence data. Plant Systematics and Evolution 211: 93-102.
4. APG [ANGIOSPERM PHYLOGENY GROUP]. 1998. An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 85: 531-553.
5. BLOEMBERGEN, S. 1952. A critical study in the complex-polymorphous genus Schima (Theaceae). Reinwardtia 2: 133-183.
6. BREMER, K. 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42: 795-803.
7. CHANG, H.-T., AND B. BARTHOLOMEW. 1984. Camellias. Timber Press, Portland, Oregon, USA.
8. CHASE, M. W., ET AL. 1993. Phylogenies of seed plants: an analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 528-580.
9. CRONQUIST, A. 1981. An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.
10. DAHLGREN, R. M. T. 1983. General aspects of angiosperm evolution and macrosystematics. Nordic Journal of Botany 3: 119-149.
11. DOBZHANSKY, T., F. J. AYALA, G. L. STEBBINS, AND J. W. VALENTINE. 1977. Patterns of speciation in evolution. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, USA.
12. DONOGHUE, M. J., R. G. OLMSTEAD, J. F. SMITH, AND J. D. PALMER. 1992. Phylogenetic relationships of the Dipsacales based on rbcL sequences. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 79: 333-345.
13. DOYLE, J. J., AND J. L. DOYLE. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin 19: 11-15.
14. EHRLICH, P. R., R. W. HOLM, AND D. R. PARNELL. 1974. The process of evolution, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, New York, USA.
15. ERIKSSON, T. 1998. AutoDecay, version 4.0 (program distributed by the author). Department of Botany, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
16. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Confidence intervals on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
17. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1988. Phylogenies from molecular sequences: inference and reliability. Annual Review of Genetics 22: 521-565.
18. FITCH, W. M. 1971. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Systematic Zoology 20: 406-416.
19. GOLDBERG, A. 1986. Classification, evolution, and phylogeny of the families of dicotyledons. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
20. GOLDMAN, N., J. P. ANDERSON, AND A. G. RODRIGO. 2000. Likelihood-based tests of topologies in phylogenetics. Systematic Biology 49: 652-670.
21. HASEGAWA. M., H. KISHINO, AND T. YANO. 1985. Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. Journal of Molecular Evolution 21: 160-174.
22. JUDD, W. S., C. S. CAMPBELL, E. A. KELLOGG, AND P. F. STEVENS. 1999. Plant systematics: a phylogenetic approach. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
23. JUKES, T. H., AND C. R. CANTOR. 1969. Evolution of protein molecules. In H. N. Munro [ed.], Mammalian protein metabolism, 21-132. Academic Press, New York, New York, USA.
24. KENG, H. 1962. Comparative morphological studies in Theaceae. University of California Publications in Botany 33: 269-384.
25. KENG, H. 1980. On the unification of Laplacea and Gordonia (Theaceae). Gardens' Bulletin (Singapore) 33: 303-311.
26. KIMURA, M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution 16: 111-120.
27. KRON, K. A., AND M. W. CHASE. 1993. Systematics of the Ericaceae, Empetraceae, Epacridaceae and related taxa based upon rbcL sequence data. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 735-741.
28. LANAVE, C., G. PREPARATA, C. SACCONE, AND G. SERIO. 1984. A new method for calculating evolutionary substitution rates. Journal of Molecular Evolution 20: 86-93.
29. LAWRENCE, G. H. M. 1951. Taxonomy of vascular plants. Macmillan, New York, New York, USA.
30. MADDISON, D. R. 1991. The discovery and importance of multiple islands of most-parsimonious trees. Systematic Zoology 40: 315-328.
31. MELCHIOR, H. 1925. Theaceae. In A. Engler and E. Prantl [eds.], Die naturlichen Pflanzenfamilien, 2nd ed., vol. 21, 109-154. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig, Germany.
32. MELCHIOR, H. 1964. Theaceae. In A. Engler [ed.], Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien, Band II, 166-168. Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin, Germany.
33. MIRBEL, M. 1813. Notes pour servir à l'histoire naturelle de la famille des Orangers de M. A.-L. de Jussieu. Nouveau Bulletin des Sciences par la Société Philomatique 75: 377-383.
34. MORGAN, D. R., AND D. E. SOLTIS. 1993. Phylogenetic relationships among members of Saxifragaceae sensu lato based on rbcL sequence data. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 631-660.
35. MORTON, C. M., M. W. CHASE, K. A. KRON, AND S. M. SWENSEN. 1996. A molecular evaluation of the monophyly of the order Ebenales based upon rbcL sequence data. Systematic Botany 21: 567-586.
36. MORTON, C. M., K. G. KAROL, AND M. W. CHASE. 1997. Taxonomic affinities of Physena (Physenaceae) and Asteropeia (Theaceae). Botanical Review 63: 231-239.
37. MORTON, C. M., S. A. MORI, G. T. PRANCE, K. G. KAROL, AND M. W. CHASE. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships of Lecythidaceae: a cladistic analysis using rbcL sequence and morphological data. American Journal of Botany 84: 530-540.
38. OLMSTEAD, R. G., H. J. MICHAELS, K. M. SCOTT, AND J. D. PALMER. 1992. Monophyly of the Asteridae and idenfication of their major lineages inferred from DNA sequences of rbcL. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 79: 249-265.
39. PRINCE, L. M. 2000. Additional evidence of monophyly, paraphyly, and polyphyly in genera of Theaceae. American Journal of Botany 87: 178 (Abstract).
40. RAMBAUT, A. 1996. Se-Al, Sequence alignment editor, version 1.0 alpha 1. Department of Zoology, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
41. RODRÍGUEZ, F., J. L. OLIVER, A. MARÍN, AND J. R. MEDINA. 1990. The general stochastic model of nucleotide substitution. Journal of Theoretical Biology 142: 485-501.
42. SANGER, F., S. NICKLEN, AND A. R. COULSON. 1977. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 74: 5463-5467.
43. SAVOLAINEN, V., M. W. CHASE, S. B. HOOT, C. M. MORTON, D. E. SOLTIS, C. BAYER, M. F. FAY, A. Y. DE BRUIJN, S. SULLIVAN, AND Y-L. QIU. 2000. Phylogenetics of flowering plants based on combined analysis of plastid atpB and rbcL gene sequences. Systematic Biology 49: 306-362.
44. SEALY, J. R. 1958. A revision of the genus Camellia. Royal Horticultural Society, London, UK.
45. SOLTIS, D. E., P. S. SOLTIS, M. E. MORT, M. W. CHASE, V. SAVOLAINEN, S. B. HOOT, AND C. M. MORTON. 1998. Inferring complex phylogenies using parsimony: an empirical approach using three large DNA data sets for angiosperms. Systematic Biology 47: 32-42.
46. SOLTIS, D. E., ET AL. 2000. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 133: 381-461.
47. SWOFFORD, D. L. 1998. PAUP *: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods), version 4.0. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
48. SWOFFORD, D. L., G. J. OLSEN, P. J. WADDELL, AND D. M. HILLIS. 1996. Chapter 11: phylogenetic inference. In D. M. Hillis, C. Moritz, and B. K. Mable [eds.], Molecular systematics, 2nd ed., 407-514. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
49. TAKHTAJAN, A. 1997. Diversity and classification of flowering plants. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.
50. TAVARÉ, S. 1986. Some probabilistic and statistical problems on the analysis of DNA sequences. Lectures on Mathematics in the Life Sciences 17: 57-86.
51. TAYLOR, J. W., AND E. SWANN. 1994. DNA from herbarium specimens. In B. Herrmann and S. Hummel [eds.], Ancient DNA. 166-181. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA.
52. THORNE, R. F. 1992. Classification and geography of the flowering plants. Botanical Review 58: 225-348.
53. TSOU, C.-H. 1997. Embryology of the Theaceae-anther and ovule development of Camellia, Franklinia, and Schima. American Journal of Botany 81: 369-381.
54. TSOU, C.-H. 1998. Early floral development of Camellioideae (Theaceae). American Journal of Botany 85: 1531-1547.
55. VOGELSTEIN, B., AND D. GILLESPIE. 1979. Preparative and analytical purification of DNA from agarose. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 76: 615-619.
56. WENDEL, J. F. 2000. Genome evolution in polyploids. Plant Molecular Biology 42: 225-249.
57. XIANG, Q.-Y., D. E. SOLTIS, AND P. S. SOLTIS. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships of Cornaceae and close relatives inferred from matK and rbcL sequences. American Journal of Botany 85: 285-297.
58. YANG, S.-X. 1998. Systematics, diversification, and geographical distribution of Pyrenaria sensu lato (Theaceae). Ph.D. dissertation, Kunming Institute of Botany, Yunnan, China.
59. YE, C.-X. 1990. A discussion on relationships among the genera in Theoideae (Theaceae). Acta Scientarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatseni 29: 74-81.