Clinical and radiographic assessment of Class II esthetic restorations in primary molars

Pediatric Dentistry

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 479-485

  Fuks, Anna Blinder ^a   Araujo, Fernando Borba ^b   Osorio, Leandro Berni ^b   Hadani, Pnina Ever ^c   Pinto, Alice S ^b  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO SUL   (Brazil)

^c HEBREW UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DENTAL ALLOY; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; DISPERSALLOY; GLASS IONOMER; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SCOTCHBOND MULTI PURPOSE; SCOTCHBOND MULTI-PURPOSE; SILICON DIOXIDE; VITREMER; Z100 COMPOSITE RESIN; ZIRCONIUM;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CHILD; CLASSIFICATION; COLOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECIDUOUS TOOTH; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GINGIVA DISEASE; HUMAN; MALE; MOLAR TOOTH; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PATHOLOGY; PREVALENCE; RADIOGRAPHY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH CERVIX;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CHILD; COLOR; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MALE; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MOLAR; PREVALENCE; RESIN CEMENTS; SILICON DIOXIDE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOOTH CERVIX; TOOTH EXFOLIATION; TOOTH, DECIDUOUS; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 0034323633     PISSN: 01641263     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Hse KMY, Wei SHI: Clinical evaluation of compomer in primary teeth: 1 year results. J Am Dent Assoc 128:1088-96, 1997.
2. Hse KMY, Leung SK, Wei SHY: Resin-ionomer restorative materials for children: a review. Aust Dent J 44:1-11, 1999.
3. FDI World Dental Federation: Policy statement on mercury and amalgam in dentistry. FDI World 1:14-17, 1992.
4. American Dental Association: American Dental Association statement on dental amalgam. Chicago: American Dental Association; December 1990.
5. United States Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. Dental Amalgam: A scientific review and recommended Public Health Service strategy for research, education and regulation : final report of Subcommittee on Risk Management, Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service; January 1993.
6. FDI World Dental Federation and World Health Organization. Concensus statement on dental amalgam. FDI World 4:9-10, 1995.
7. Mass E, Gordon M, Fuks AB: Assessment of compomer proximal restorations in primary molars: A retrospective study in children. J Dent Child 66:93-97, 1999.
8. Kilpatrick NM: Durability of restorations in primary molars: a review. J Dent 21:67-73, 1993.
9. Papathanasiou AD, Curzon MET, Fairpo CG: The influence of restorative material on the survival rate of restorations in primary molars. Pediatr Dent 16:282-88, 1994.
10. Qvist V, Qyist J, Mjor IA: Placement and longevity of tooth colored restorations in Denmark. Acta Odontol Scand 48:305-11, 1990.
11. Berg JH: The continuum of restorative materials in pediatric dentistry - a review for the clinician. Pediatr Dent 20:93-100, 1998.
12. Mount GJ: Clinical placement of modern glass-ionomer cements. Quintessence Int 2:99-107, 1993.
13. Mount GJ: Glass ionomer cements and future research. Am J Dent 7:286-92, 1994.
14. Qvist V, Teglers PT, Laurberg L, Poulsen A: Glass ionomer versus amalgam restorations in primary teeth - 1.1/2 year results. J Dent Res 73:417, abs 2523, 1992.
15. Croll TC, Helpin ML: Class II Vitremer restoration of primary molars. J Dent Child 62:17-21, 1995.
16. Holan G, Chosack A, Casamassimo PS, Eidelman E: Marginal leakage of impregnated Class II composites in primary molars: an in vivo study. Oper Dent 17:122-28, 1992.
17. Cvar JF, Ryge G: Criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials USPHS Publication No 790 p 244 San Francisco: US Government Printing Office.
18. Holland IS, Walls AWG, Wallwork WA: The longevity of amalgam restorations in deciduous molars. Br Dent J 161:255-58, 1986.
19. Welbury RR, Walls AWG, Murray JJ: The 5-year results of a clinical trial comparing a glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement restorations with an amalgam restoration. Br Dent J 170:177-81, 1991.
20. Widstrom E, Forss H: Selection of restorative materials in dental treatment of children and adults in public and private dental care in Finland. Swed Dent J 18:1-7, 1994.
21. Forss H, Windstrom E: Factors influencing the selection of restorative materials in dental care in Finland. J Dent 24:257-62, 1996.
22. Christensen GJ: Restoration of pediatric posterior teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 127:106-108, 1996.
23. Croll TP, Helpin MK: Class II Vitremer restorations of primary molars. J Dent Child 62:17-21, 1995.
24. Croll TP, Killian CM: Visible light-hardened glass ionomer/ resin cement restorations for primary teeth. New development. Quintessence Int 23:679-82, 1992.
25. Croll TP, Killian CM, Helpin ML: A restorative dentistry renaissance for children: light-hardened glass ionomer/resin cement. J Dent Child 60:89-94, 1993.
26. Croll TP, Killian CM: Class I and Class II light-hardened glass ionomer/resin restorations. Compend Contin Educ Dent 14:908-18, 1993.
27. Papagiannoulis L, Kakaboura A, Pantaleon F, Kavvadia K: Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) in Class II restorations of primary teeth: a two-year follow-up study. Pediatr Dent 21:231-34, 1999.
28. Eidelman E, Fuks A, Chosack A: A clinical radiographic, and SEM evaluation of Class II Composite restorations in primary teeth. Oper Dent 14:58-63, 1989.
29. Oldenburg TR, Vann WF Jr, Dilley DC: Composite restorations for primary molars: two-year results. Pediatr Dent 7:96-103, 1985.
30. Paquette DE, Vann WR Jr, Odenburg TR, Leinfelder KF: Modified cavity preparations for composite resins in primary molars. Pediatr Dent 5:246-51, 1983.
31. Varpio M: Proximocclusal composite restorations in primary molars: a six-year follow-up. J Dent Child 52:435-40, 1985.
32. Hickel R: Glass Ionomers, cermets, hybrid-ionomers and compomers - (long term) Clinical evaluation. Academy of Dental Materials - Proceedings of Conference on "Clinically Appropriate alternatives to amalgam" - Transactions Vol 9, 1996.
33. Toledano M, Osorio E, Osorio R, Garcia-Godoy F: Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations. J Prosthet Dent 81:610-15, 1999.
34. Donly KJ, Grandgenett C: Dentin demineralization inhibition at restoration margins of Vitremer, Dyract and Compoglass. Am J Dent 11:245-48, 1998.
35. Mjor IA: Glass-ionomer cement restorations and secondary caries: a preliminary report. Quintessence Int 27:171-74, 1996.
36. Barnes DM, Blank LW, Gingell, JC et al: A clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer restorative material. J Am Dent Assoc. 126:1245-53, 1995,
37. Nicholson, JW and Croll, TP: Glass-ionomers in restorative dentistry. Quintessence Int., 28:705-14, November 1997.
38. Donly, KJ, Segura, A, Kanellis, M. and Erickson, RL: Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations. J Am Dent Assoc., 130:1459-66, October 1999.
39. nd International Symposium on glass ionomers. Philadelphia, 1994.
40. Peters TCRB, Roeters JJM, Frankenmolen FWA: Clinical evaluation of Dyract in primary molars: 1-year results. Am J Dent 9:83-87, 1996.