Effects of cooperative and individual learning during learner-controlled computer-based instruction

Journal of Experimental Education

Volumn 66, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 223-244

  Crooks, Steven M ^a   Klein, James D ^b   Savenye, Wilhelmina ^b   Leader, Lars ^b  

^a SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY EDWARDSVILLE   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032380092     PISSN: 00220973     EISSN: 19400683     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00220979809604406     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Balson, P. M., Manning, D. T., Ebner, D. G., & Brooks, F. R. (1984-1985). Instructor controlled versus student-controlled training in a videodisc-based paramedical program. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 13(2), 123-130.
2. Becker, H. J. (1991) How computers are used in schools. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 7(4), 385-106.
3. Bossert, S. T. (1988-1989). Cooperative activities in the classroom. In E. Z. Rothkopf (Vol. Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 15, pp. 225-250). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
4. Campanizzi, J. A. (1978). Effects of locus of control and provision of overviews in a computer-assisted instruction sequence. AEDS Journal, 12(1), 21-30.
5. Carrier, C. A., Davidson, G., Higson, V., & Williams, M. (1984). Selection of options by field independent and dependent children in a computer-based concept lesson. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 11(2), 49-54.
6. Carrier, C. A., Davidson, G., & Williams, M. (1985). The selection of instructional options in a computer-based coordinate concept lesson. Educational Communication & Technology Journal, 33. 199-212.
7. Carrier, C. A., & Sales, G. (1987). Pair versus individual work on the acquisition of concepts in a computer-based instructional lesson. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 14, 11-17.
8. Carrier, C. A., & Williams, M. D. (1988). A test of one leamer-control strategy with students of differing levels of task persistence. American Educational Research Journal, 25, 285-306.
9. Cavalier, J. C. (1996). Effects of learning strategy and orienting activity during computer-based instruction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe.
10. Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 21-29.
11. Cook, L. (1991). Cooperative learning: A successful college teaching strategy. Innovative Higher Education, 16(1), 27-38.
12. Crooks, S. M., Klein, J. D., Jones, E., & Dwyer, H., (1996). Effects of cooperative learning and leam-er-control modes in computer-based instruction. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 29(2), 109-123.
13. Dalton, D. W., Hannafm, M. J., & Hooper, S. (1989). Effects of individual and cooperative computer-assisted instruction on student performance and attitude. Educational Technology Research and Development, 37(2), 15-24.
14. Doran, M. S. (1994). The effects of individual, cooperative and collaborative learning structures using a computer simulation in accounting. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe.
15. Femald, P. S., Chiseri, M. J., & Lawson, D. W. (1975). Systematic manipulation of student pacing, the perfection requirement, and contact with a teaching assistant in an introductory psychology course. Teaching of Psychology, 2(4), 147-151.
16. Fisher, M. D., Blackwell, L. R., Garcia, A. B., & Greene J. C. (1975). Effects of student control and choice on engagement in a CAI arithmetic task in a low-income school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 776-783.
17. Fry, J. P. (1972). Interactive relationship between inquisitiveness and student control of instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 459-465.
18. Glass, G. V, & Hopkins, K. D. (1984). Statistical methods in education and psychology (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
19. Gray, S. H. (1987). The effect of sequence control on computer assisted learning. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 14, 54-56.
20. Hansell, S., & Slavin, R. E. (1981). Cooperative learning and the structure of interracial friendships. Sociology of Education, 54, 98-106.
21. Hicken, S., Sullivan, H. J., & Klein, J. D. (1992). Learner control modes and incentive variations in computer-delivered instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(A), 15-26.
22. Hooper, S. (1992a). Effects of peer interaction during computer-based mathematics instruction. The Journal of Educational Research, 85(3), 180-189.
23. Hooper, S. (1992b). Cooperative learning and computer-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(3), 21-38.
24. Hooper, S., Temiyakam, C., & Williams, M. D. (1993). The effects of cooperative learning and learner control on high- and average-ability students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41(2), 5-18.
25. Igoe, A. (1993). Learner control over instruction and achievement goals in computer-assisted instruction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe.
26. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Minneapolis, MN: Interaction Book.
27. Johnson, R. T., Johnson, D. W., & Stanne, M. B. (1985). Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology. 77, 668-677.
28. Johnson, R. T., Johnson, D. W., & Stanne, M. B. (1986). Comparison of computer-assisted cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. American Educational Research Journal, 23(3), 382-392.
29. King, A. (1990). Enhancing peer interaction and learning in the classroom through reciprocal questioning. American Educational Research Journal, 27(4), 664-687.
30. King, A., & Rosenshine, B. (1994). Effects of guided cooperative questioning on children’s knowledge construction. The Journal of Experimental Education, 61(2), 127-147.
31. Kinzie, M. B., Sullivan, H. J., & Berdel, R. L. (1988). Learner control and achievement in science computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 299-303.
32. Klein, J. D., & Doran, M. S. (in press). Implementing individual and small group learning structures with a computer simulation. Educational Technology.
33. Klein, J. D., Eurchul, J. A., & Pridemore, D. R. (1994). Effects of individual versus cooperative learning and type of reward on performance and continuing motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 24-32.
34. Klein, J. D., & Keller, J. M. (1990). Influence of student ability, locus of control, and type of instructional control on performance and confidence. The Journal of Educational Research, 83(3), 140-146.
35. Klein J. D., & Pridemore, D. R. (1994). Effects of orienting activities and practice on achievement, continuing motivation, and student behaviors in a cooperative learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(3), 41-54.
36. Lopez, C. L., & Harper, M. (1989). The relationship between learner control of CAI and locus of control among Hispanic students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 37(4), 19-28.
37. Makuch, J. R., Robillard, P. D., & Yoder, E. P. (1992). Effects of individual versus paired/cooperative computer-assisted instruction on the effectiveness and efficiency of an in-service training lesson. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 20(3), 199-208.
38. Mayer, R. E. (1976). Some conditions of meaningful learning for computer programming: Advance organizers and subject control of frame order. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68(2), 143-150.
39. Mevarech, Z. R., Silber, O., & Fine, D. (1991). Learning with computers in small groups: Cognitive and affective outcomes. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 7(2), 233-243.
40. Mevarech, Z. R., Stem, D., & Levita, I. (1987). To cooperate or not to cooperate in CAI: That is the question. The Journal of Educational Research, 80, 164-167.
41. Milheim, W. D., & Martin, B. L. (1991). Theoretical bases for the use of learner control: Three different perspectives. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 18(3), 99-105.
42. Mills, B. J. (1991). Enhancing adult learning through cooperative small groups. Continuing Higher Education Review, 55(3), 144-154.
43. Newkirk, R. L. (1973). A comparison of learner control and machine control strategies for computer-assisted instruction. Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 10(2), 82-91.
44. Orr, K. L., & Davidson, G. V. (1993, January). The effects of computer-based instruction and learning style on achievement and attitude. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, New Orleans, LA.
45. Pollock, J. C., & Sullivan, H. J. (1990). Practice mode and learner control in computer-based instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 15, 251-260.
46. Reeves, T. C. (1993, January). Pseudoscience in instructional technology: The case of learner control research. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, New Orleans, LA .
47. Reiser, R. A., & Sullivan, H. J. (1977). Effects of self-pacing and instructor-pacing in a PSI course. The Journal of Educational Research, 71(1), 8-12.
48. Ross, S. M., Morrison, G. R., & O’Dell, J. K. (1989). Uses and effects of learner control of context and instructional support in computer-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 37(4), 29-39.
49. Schlecter, T. M. (1990). The relative instructional efficiency of small group computer-based training. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 6, 329-341.
50. Sharan, S. (1980). Cooperative learning in small groups: Recent methods and effects on achievement, attitudes, and ethnic relations. Review of Educational Research, 50, 241-272.
51. Sherman, G. P., & Klein, J. D. (1995). The effects of cued interaction and ability grouping during cooperative computer-based science instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43(4), 5-25.
52. Slavin, R. E. (1983). When does cooperative learning increase student achievement? Psychological Bulletin, 940), 429-445.
53. Slavin, R. E. (1990). Point-counterpoint: Ability grouping, cooperative learning and the gifted. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 14(3), 3-8.
54. Steinberg, E. R. (1977). Review of student control in computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Computer Based Instruction, 3, 84-90.
55. Stevens, J. (1992). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
56. Sullivan, H. J., & Higgins, N. (1983) Teaching for competence. New York & London: Teachers College Press.
57. Trowbridge, D., & Dumin, R. (1984). Results from an investigation of groups working at the computer. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
58. Webb, N. M. (1987). Peer interaction and learning with computers in small groups. Computers in Human Behavior. 3, 193-209.
59. Webb, N. M. (1989). Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 21-39.
60. Whyte, M. M., Knirk, F. G., Casey, R. J., & Willard, M. L. (1991). Individualistic versus paired/cooperative computer-assisted instruction: Matching instructional method with cognitive style. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 19(4), 299-312.
61. Wolf, B. (1994). The effects of cooperative learning and learner control in computer-based instruction. Unpublished doctoral disseration, Arizona State University, Tempe.