Dyadic vs. Individual practice with exploratory and directive mathematics tutors

Journal of Educational Computing Research

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 165-186

  Yadrick, Robert M ^a   Regian, J Wesley ^b   Connolly Gomez, Catherine ^b   Robertson Schule, Linda ^b  

^a USAF   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031498503     PISSN: 07356331     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2190/1LVL-N5PK-M9QM-RXFF     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. N. M. Webb, Peer Interaction and Learning with Computers in Small Groups, Computers in Human Behavior, 3, pp. 193-209, 1987.
2. R. E. Slavin, Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1990.
3. R. E. Slavin, Synthesis of Research on Cooperative Learning, Educational Leadership, 48:5, pp. 71-82, 1991.
4. D. W. Johnson and R. T. Johnson, Learning Together and Alone: Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Learning (3rd Edition), Allyn & Bacon, Boston, 1991.
5. M. B. Goor and J. O. Schwenn, Accommodating Diversity and Disability with Cooperative Learning, Intervention in School and Clinic, 29:1, pp. 6-16, 1993.
6. D. Jonassen, Aptitude vs. Content Treatment Interactions: Implications for Instructional Design, Journal of Instructional Development, 5:4, pp. 15-27, 1982.
7. S. Sharan, Z. Ackerman, and R. Hertz-Lazarowitz, Academic Achievement of Elementary Education School Children in Small Groups, Journal of Experimental Education, 48, pp. 125-129, 1980.
8. S. Hooper, Effects of Peer Interaction during Computer-Based Mathematics Instruction, Journal of Educational Research, 85, pp. 180-189, 1992.
9. N. M. Webb, Task-Related Verbal Interaction and Mathematics Learning in Small Groups, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, pp. 366-389, 1991.
10. S. Hooper, C. Temiyakarn, and M. D. Williams, The Effects of Cooperative Learning and Learner Control on High- and Average-Ability Students, Educational Technology Research and Development, 41, pp. 5-18, 1993.
11. S. D. Teasley, The Role of Talk in Children's Peer Collaborations, Developmental Psychology, 31:2, pp. 207-220, 1995.
12. L. E. Berk, Children's Private Speech: An Overview of Theory and the Status of Research, in Private Speech: From Social Interaction to Self-Regulation, R. M. Diaz and L. E. Berk (eds.), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 17-53, 1992.
13. S. D. Stephenson, The Effects of Student-Instructor Interaction and Paired/Individual Study on Achievement in Computer-Based Training (CBT), Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 19:1, pp. 22-26, 1992.
14. E. R. Steinberg, Review of Student Control in Computer-Assisted Instruction, Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 3, pp. 84-90, 1977.
15. M. B. Kinzie, Requirements and Benefits of Effective Interactive Instruction: Learner Control, Self-Regulation, and Continuing Motivation, Educational Technology Research and Development, 38, pp. 1-21, 1990.
16. R. A. Avner, C. Moore, and S. Smith, Active External Control: A Basis for Superiority of CBI, Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 6, pp. 115-118, 1980.
17. I. Rubincam and W. P. Olivier, An Investigation of Limited Learner-Control Options in a CAI Mathematics Course, AEDS Journal, pp. 211-226, Summer 1985.
18. S. H. Gray, The Effect of Sequence Control on Computer-Assisted Learning, Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 14, pp. 54-56, 1987.
19. D. W. Dalton, The Effects of Cooperative Learning Strategies on Achievement and Attitudes during Interactive Video, Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 17, pp. 8-16, 1990.
20. G. R. Morrison, S. M. Ross, and W. Baldwin, Learner Control of Context and Instructional Support in Learning Elementary School Mathematics, Educational Technology Research and Development, 40, pp. 5-13, 1992.
21. D. R. Pridemore and J. D. Klein, Control of Feedback in Computer-Assisted Instruction, Educational Technology Research and Development, 39, pp. 27-32, 1991.
22. S. Hicken, H. Sullivan, and J. Klein, Learner Control Modes and Incentive Variations in Computer-Delivered Instruction, Educational Technology Research and Development, 40, pp. 15-26, 1992.
23. M. B. Kinzie, H. J. Sullivan, and R. L. Berdel, Learner Control and Achievement in Science Computer-Assisted Instruction, Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, pp. 299-303, 1988.
24. W. D. Milheim and B. L. Martin, Theoretical Bases for the Use of Learner Control: Three Different Perspectives, Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 18, pp. 99-105, 1991.
25. D. L. Butler and P. H. Winne, Feedback and Self-Regulating Learning: A Theoretical Synthesis, Review of Educational Research, 65, pp. 245-282, 1995.
26. R. P. Niemiec, C. Sikorski, and H. J. Walberg, Learner-Control Effects: A Review of Reviews and Meta-Analysis, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 15:2, pp. 157-174, 1996.
27. S. Hooper, T. W. Ward, M. J. Hannafin, and H. T. Clark, The Effects of Aptitude Composition on Achievement during Small Group Learning, Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 16, pp. 102-109, 1989.
28. E. R. Steinberg, Cognition and Learner Control: A Literature Review, 1977-1988, Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 16, pp. 117-121, 1989.
29. C. L. Tennyson, R. D. Tennyson, and W. Rothen, Content Structure and Instructional Control Strategies as Design Variables in Concept Acquisition, Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, pp. 499-505, 1980.
30. G. Gay, Interaction of Learner Control and Prior Understanding in Computer-Assisted Video Instruction, Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, pp. 225-227, 1986.
31. S. S. Lee and Y. H. K. Lee, Effects of Learner-Control versus Program Control Strategies on Computer-Aided Learning of Chemistry Problems: For Acquisition or Review? Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, pp. 491-498, 1991.
32. S. S. Lee and S. C.-H. Wong, Adaptive Program vs. Learner Control Strategy on Computer Aided Learning of Gravimetric Stoichiometry Problems, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 21, pp. 367-379, 1989.
33. R. D. Tennyson and W. Rothen, Management of Computer Based Instruction: Design of an Adaptive Control Strategy, Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 5, pp. 63-71, 1979.
34. S. M. Ross and E. A. Rakow, Learner Control versus Program Control as Adaptive Strategies for Selection of Instructional Support on Math Rules, Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, pp. 745-753, 1981.
35. S. Hooper and M. J. Hannafin, Cooperative CBI: The Effects of Heterogeneous versus Homogeneous Grouping on the Learning of Progressively Complex Concepts, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4, pp. 413-424, 1988.
36. B. K. Nastasi and D. H. Clements, Research on Cooperative Learning: Implications for Practice, School Psychology Review, 20, pp. 110-131, 1991.
37. S. Hooper and M. J. Hannafin, Cooperative Learning and Computer-Based Instruction: Achievement, Interaction, and Performance, Proceedings of the 31st International Conference of the Association for the Development of Computer-Based Instructional Systems, ADCIS, Washington, D.C., pp. 279-286, 1989.
38. E. R. Steinberg, A. B. Baskin, and T. D. Matthews, Computer-Presented Organizational/Memory Aids as Instruction for Solving Pico-Fomi Problems, Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 12, pp. 44-49, 1985.
39. S. K. Reed, A. Dempster, and M. Ettinger, Usefulness of Analogous Solutions for Solving Algebra Word Problems, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, pp. 106-125, 1985.
40. Toolbook 1.0 [Computer Program], Asymetrix Corporation, Bellevue, Washington, 1989.
41. SPSS for Windows 6.0 [Computer Program], SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, 1992.