Establishing sexual dimorphism: Conservation amidst diversity?

Nature Reviews Genetics

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 175-185

  Zarkower, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA;

REPRESSOR PROTEIN;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; FLY; GENE DOSAGE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; GENETICS; HUMAN; METABOLISM; REVIEW; SEX CHROMOSOME; SEX DETERMINATION; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT; VERTEBRATE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; CYTOGENETIC ANALYSIS; DIPTERA; GENE DOSAGE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; HUMANS; REPRESSOR PROTEINS; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; SEX CHROMOSOMES; SEX DETERMINATION (ANALYSIS); TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC; VERTEBRATES;

EID: 0035293669     PISSN: 14710056     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/35056032     Document Type: Review

References (111)

1. Barton, N. H. & Charlesworth, B. Why sex and recombination? Science 281, 1986-1989 (1998).
2. Welch, D. M. & Meselson, M. Evidence for the evolution of bdelloid rotifers without sexual reproduction or genetic exchange. Science 288, 1211-1215 (2000).
3. Marin, I. & Baker, B. S. The evolutionary dynamics of sex determination. Science 281, 1990-1994 (1998).
4. Sinclair, A. H. et al. A gene from the human sex-determining region encodes a protein with homology to a conserved DNA-binding motif. Nature 346, 240-244 (1990).
5. Cline, T. W. & Meyer, B. J. Vive la difference: males vs females in flies vs worms. Annu. Rev. Genet. 30, 637-702 (1996).
6. Fredga, K. in The Differences Between the Sexes (eds Short, R. V. & Balaban, E.) 419-431 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1994).
7. Schutt, C. & Nothinger, R. Structure, function and evolution of sex-determining systems in dipteran insects. Development 127, 667-677 (2000).
8. Graves, J. A. Mammals that break the rules: genetics of marsupials and monotremes. Annu. Rev. Genet. 30, 233-260 (1996).
9. Charlesworth, B. The evolution of chromosomal sex determination and dosage compensation. Curr. Biol. 6, 149-162 (1996).
10. Hodgkin, J. Genetic sex determination mechanisms and evolution. Bioessays 14, 253-261 (1992).
11. Bull, J. J. Evolution of Sex Determining Mechanisms (Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, California, 1983).
12. Stevanovic, M., Lovell-Badge, R., Collignon, J. & Goodfellow, P. N. SOX3 is an X-linked gene related to SRY. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2, 2013-2018 (1993).
13. Foster, J. W. & Graves, J. A. An SRY-related sequence on the marsupial X chromosome: implications for the evolution of the mammalian testis-determining gene. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 1927-1931 (1994).
14. Lahn, B. T. & Page, D. C. Four evolutionary strata on the human X chromosome. Science 286, 964-967 (1999).
15. Marin, I., Siegal, M. L. & Baker, B. S. The evolution of dosage-compensation mechanisms. Bioessays 22, 1106-1114 (2000).
16. Marin, I., Franke, A., Bashaw, G. J. & Baker, B. S. The dosage compensation system of Drosophila is co-opted by newly evolved X chromosomes. Nature 383, 160-163 (1996).
17. Bopp, D., Calhoun, G., Horabin, J. I., Samuels, M. & Schedl, P. Sex-specific control of Sex-lethal is a conserved mechanism for sex determination in the genus Drosophila. Development 122, 971-982 (1996).
18. O'Neil, M. T. & Belote, J. M. Interspecific comparison of the transformer gene of Drosophila reveals an unusually high degree of evolutionary divergence. Genetics 131, 113-128 (1992).
19. Chandler, D. et al. Evolutionary conservation of regulatory strategies for the sex determination factor transformer-2. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 2908-2919 (1997).
20. Muller-Holtkamp, F. The Sex-lethal homologue in Chrysomya rufifacies is highly conserved in sequence and exon-intron organization. J. Mol. Evol. 41, 467-477 (1995).
21. Sievert, V., Kuhn, S. & Traut, W. Expression of the sex determining cascade genes Sex-lethal and doublesex in the phorid fly Megaselia scalaris. Genome 40, 211-214 (1997).
22. Meise, M. et al. Sex-lethal, the master sex-determining gene in Drosophila, is not sex-specifically regulated in Musca domestica. Development 125, 1487-1494 (1998).
23. Dauwalder, B., Amaya-Manzanares, F. & Mattox, W. A human homologue of the Drosophila sex determination factor transformer-2 has conserved splicing regulatory functions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 9004-9009 (1996).
24. Beil, B., Screaton, G. & Stamm, S. Molecular cloning of htra2-β-1 and htra2-β-2, two human homologues of tra-2 generated by alternative splicing. DNA Cell Biol. 16, 679-690 (1997).
25. Tacke, R., Tohyama, M., Ogawa, S. & Manley, J. L. Human TRA2 proteins are sequence-specific activators of pre-mRNA splicing. Cell 93, 139-148 (1998).
26. Shearman, D. C. & Frommer, M. The Bactrocera tryoni homologue of the Drosophila melanogaster sex-determination gene doublesex. Insect Mol. Biol. 7, 355-366 (1998).
27. Shimada, T. & Ohbayashi, F. Bombyx mori Bmdsx mRNA for BmDSX-M, complete cds, male specific (AB4B544); and mRNA for BmDSX-F, complete cds, female specific (AB048543). GenBank (2000).[style?]
28. de Bono, M. & Hodgkin, J. Evolution of sex determination in Caenorhabditis: unusually high divergence of tra-1 and its functional consequences. Genetics 144, 587-595 (1996).
29. Kuwabara, P. E. Interspecies comparison reveals evolution of control regions in the nematode sex-determining gene tra-2. Genetics 144, 597-607 (1996).
30. Kuwabara, P. E. & Shah, S. Cloning by synteny: identifying C. briggsae homologues of C. elegans genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 4414-4418 (1994).
31. Streit, A. et al. Homologs of the Caenorhabditis elegans masculinizing gene her-1 in C. briggsae and the filarial parasite Brugia malayi. Genetics 152, 1573-1584 (1999).
32. Ventura-Holman, T., Seldin, M. F., Li, W. & Maher, J. F. The murine fem 1 gene family: homologs of the Caenorhabditis elegans sex-determination protein FEM-1. Genomics 54, 221-230 (1998).
33. Raymond, C. S. et al. Evidence for evolutionary conservation of sex-determining genes. Nature 391, 691-695 (1998).
34. Erdman, S. E. & Burtis, K. C. The Drosophila doublesex proteins share a novel zinc finger related DNA binding domain. EMBO J. 12, 527-535 (1993).
35. Zhu, L. et al. Sexual dimorphism in diverse metazoans is regulated by a novel class of intertwined zinc fingers. Genes Dev. 14, 1750-1764 (2000).
36. Baker, B. S. & Ridge, K. Sex and the single cell: on the action of major loci affecting sex determination in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 94, 383-423 (1980).
37. Coschigano, K. T. & Wensink, P. C. Sex-specific transcriptional regulation by male and female doublesex proteins of Drosophila. Genes Dev. 7, 42-54 (1993).
38. An, W. & Wensink, P. C. Integrating sex-and tissue-specific regulation within a single Drosophila enhancer. Genes Dev. 9, 256-266 (1995). Together with reference 37, this paper shows that the two sex-specific isoforms of Dsx bind the same DNA site and have opposite effects on the transcription of the Yp1 yolk-protein gene.
39. Yi, W. & Zarkower, D. Similarity of DNA binding and transcriptional regulation by Caenorhabditis elegans MAB-3 and Drosophila melanogaster DSX suggests conservation of sex determining mechanisms. Development 126, 873-881 (1999).
40. Shen, M. M. & Hodgkin, J. mab-3, a gene required for sex-specific yolk protein expression and a male-specific lineage in C. elegans.Cell 54, 1019-1031 (1988).
41. Yi, W., Ross, J. M. & Zarkower, D. mab-3 is a direct tra-1 target gene that regulates diverse aspects of C. elegans male sexual behavior. Development 127, 4469-4480 (2000).
42. Nef, S. & Parada, L. F. Hormones in male sexual development. Genes Dev. 14, 3075-3086 (2000).
43. Jost, A. Recherches sur le differentiation sexuelle de l'embryo de lapin. Arch. Anat. Microsc. Morphol. Exp. 36, 117-121 (1947).
44. Jost, A. Studies on sex differentiation in mammals. Rec. Prog. Horm. Res. 8, 379-418 (1953).
45. Zimmermann, S. et al. Targeted disruption of the Insl3 gene causes bilateral cryptorchidism. Mol. Endocrinol. 13, 681-691 (1999).
46. Nef, S. & Parada, L. F. Cryptorchidism in mice mutant for Insl3. Nature Genet. 22, 295-299 (1999).
47. Nachtigal, M. W. et al. Wilms' tumor 1 and Dax-1 modulate the orphan nuclear receptor SF-1 in sex-specific gene expression. Cell 93, 445-454 (1998). Shows that Sf1 and Wt1 synergistically activate Müllerian inhibiting substance and that Dax1 antagonizes this activation in transfected cells. Provides evidence for physical interaction between Sf1 and Wt1 and between Sf1 and Dax1.
48. Swain, A., Narvaez, V. Burgoyne, P., Camerino, G. & Lovell-Badge, R. Dax1 antagonizes Sry action in mammalian sex determination. Nature 391, 761-767 (1998).
49. Vainio, S., Heikkila, M., Kispert, A., Chin, N. & McMahon, A. P. Female development in mammals is regulated by Wnt-4 signalling. Nature 397, 405-409 (1999).
50. McElreavey, K., Vilain, E., Abbas, N., Herskowitz, I. & Fellous, M. A regulatory cascade hypothesis for mammalian sex determination: SRY represses a negative regulator of male development. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90, 3363-3372 (1993).
51. Swain, A. & Lovell-Badge, R. Mammalian sex determination: a molecular drama. Genes Dev. 13, 755-767 (1999).
52. Capel, B. The battle of the sexes. Mech. Dev. 92, 89-103 (2000).
53. Gubbay, J. et al. A gene mapping to the sex-determining region of the mouse Y chromosome is a member of a novel family of embryonically expressed genes. Nature 346, 245-250 (1990).
54. Koopman, P., Gubbay, J., Vivian, N., Goodfellow, P. & Lovell-Badge. R. Male development of chromosomally female mice transgenic for Sry. Nature 351, 117-121 (1991). Provides formal proof that Sry is sufficient to induce male development in an XX mammal.
55. Tucker, P. K. & Lundrigan, B. L. Rapid evolution of the sex determining locus in Old World mice and rats. Nature 364, 715-717 (1993).
56. Whitfield, L. S., Lovell-Badge, R. & Goodfellow, P. N. Rapid sequence evolution of the mammalian sex-determining gene SRY. Nature 364, 713-715 (1993).
57. Kent, J., Wheatley, S. C., Andrews, J. E., Sinclair, A. H. & Koopman, P. A male-specific role for SOX9 in vertebrate sex determination. Development 122, 2813-2822 (1996).
58. Morais da Silva, S. et al. Sox9 expression during gonadal development implies a conserved role for the gene in testis differentiation in mammals and birds. Nature Genet. 14, 62-68 (1996).
59. Oreal, E. et al. Early expression of AMH in chicken embryonic gonads precedes testicular SOX9 expression. Dev. Dyn. 212, 522-532 (1998).
60. Spotila, L. D., Spotila, J. R. & Hall, S. E. Sequence and expression analysis of WT1 and Sox9 in the red-eared slider turtle, Trachemys scripta. J. Exp. Zool. 281, 417-427 (1998).
61. Moreno-Mendoza, N., Harley, V. R. & Merchant-Larios, H. Differential expression of SOX9 in gonads of the sea turtle Lepidochelys olivacea at male-or female-promoting temperatures. J. Exp. Zool. 254, 705-710 (1999).
62. Western, P. S., Harry, J. L., Graves, J. A. & Sinclair, A. H. Temperature-dependent sex determination: upregulation of SOX9 expression after commitment to male development. Den Dyn. 214, 171-177 (1999).
63. Foster, J. W. et al. Campomelic dysplasia and autosomal sex reversal caused by mutations in an SRY-related gene. Nature 372, 525-530 (1994).
64. Wagner, T. et al. Autosomal sex reversal and campomelic dysplasia are caused by mutations in and around the SRY-related gene SOX9. Cell 79, 1111-1120 (1994).
65. Bishop, C. E. et al. A transgenic insertion upstream of Sox9 is associated with dominant XX sex reversal in the mouse. Nature Genet. 26, 490-494 (2000). A fortuitous transgene insertion far upstream of the Sox9 gene causes constitutive expression of Sox9 in XX embryos and results in fully mate development, showing clearly the importance of Sox9 in mammals. The insertion might interfere with a negative regulatory element, consistent with the regulatory hypothesis described in reference 50.
66. Raymond, C. S., Kettlewell, J. R., Hirsch, B., Bardwell, V. J. & Zarkower, D. Expression of Dmrt1 in the genital ridge of mouse and chicken embryos suggests a role in vertebrate sexual development. Dev. Biol. 215, 208-220 (1999).
67. De Grandi, A. et al. The expression pattern of a mouse doublesex-related gene is consistent with a role in gonadal differentiation. Mech. Dev. 90, 323-326 (2000).
68. Smith, C. A., McClive, P. J., Western, P. S., Reed, K. J. & Sinclair, A. H. Conservation of a sex-determining gene. Nature 402, 601-602 (1999).
69. Moniot, B., Berta, P., Scherer, G., Sudbeck, P. & Poulat, F. Male specific expression suggests role of DMRT1 in human sex determination. Mech. Dev. 91, 323-325 (2000).
70. Kettlewell, J. R., Raymond, C. S. & Zarkower, D. Temperature-dependent expression of turtle Dmrt1 prior to sexual differentiation. Genesis 26, 174-178 (2000).
71. Marchand, O. et al. DMRT1 expression during gonadal differentiation and spermatogenesis in the rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1493, 180-187 (2000).
72. Raymond, C. S. et al. A region of human chromosome 9p required for testis development contains two genes related to known sexual regulators. Hum. Mol. Genet. 8, 989-996 (1999).
73. Nanda, I. et al. 300 million years of conserved synteny between chicken Z and human chromosome 9. Nature Genet. 21, 258-259 (1999).
74. Raymond, C. S., Murphy, M. W., O'Sullivan, M. G., Bardwell, V. J. & Zarkower, D. Dmrt1, a gene related to worm and fly sexual regulators, is required for mammalian testis differentiation. Genes Dev. 14, 2587-2595 (2000). A mouse knockout shows that Dmrt1 is required for postnatal testis differentiation, by affecting both Sertoli-cell and germ-cell development.
75. Crocker, M., Coghill, S. B. & Cortinho, R. An unbalanced autosomal translocation (7;9) associated with feminization. Clin. Genet. 34, 70-73 (1988).
76. Ogata, T. et al. Impaired male sex development in an infant with molecularly defined partial 9p monosomy: implication for a testis forming gene(s) on 9p. J. Med. Genet. 34, 331-334 (1997).
77. Ion, R. et al. Failure of testicular development associated with a rearrangement of 9p24.1 proximal to the SNF2 gene. Hum. Genet. 102, 151-156 (1998).
78. Ottolenghi, C. et al. The region on 9p associated with 46,XY sex reversal contains several transcripts expressed in the urogenital system and a novel doublesex-related domain. Genomics 64, 170-178 (2000).
79. Wilkins, A. S. Moving up the hierarchy: a hypothesis on the evolution of a genetic sex determination pathway. BioEssays 17, 71-77 (1995). Proposes that sex-determining pathways, particularly those of nematodes, have evolved by the sequential addition of upstream regulators, so helping to explain the extreme molecular differences between these pathways and the evolution of the negatively acting Caenorhabditis elegans pathway.
80. Waxman, D. & Peck, J. R. Pleiotropy and the preservation of perfection. Science 279, 1210-1213 (1998).
81. Kopp, A., Duncan, I. & Carroll, S. B. Genetic control and evolution of sexually dimorphic characters in Drosophila. Nature 408, 553-559 (2000). Shows how the differential regulation of the bric-a-brac (bab) gene by Dsx and AbdD contributes to sexually dimorphic patterning in Drosophila species and how sexual selection is likely to have affected the evolution of bab regulation.
82. Hodgkin, J. A. & Brenner, S. Mutations causing transformation of sexual phenotype in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 86, 275-287 (1977).
83. Kenyon, C. A gene involved in the development of the posterior body region of C. elegans. Cell 46, 477-487 (1986).
84. Zhao, C. & Emmons, S. W. A transcription factor controlling development of peripheral sense organs in C. elegans. Nature 373, 74-78 (1995).
85. Emmons, S. W. in Cell Lineage and Fate Determination (ed. Moody, S. A.) 139-155 (Academic, San Diego, California, 1999).
86. Wrischnik, L. A. & Kenyon, C. J. The role of lin-22, a hairy/enhancer of split homolog, in patterning the peripheral nervous system of C. elegans. Development 124, 2875-2888 (1997).
87. Branford, W. W., Benson, G. V., Ma, L., Maas, R. L. & Potter, S. S. Characterization of Hoxa-10/Hoxa-11 transheterozygotes reveals functional redundancy and regulatory interactions. Dev. Biol. 224, 373-387 (2000).
88. Hsieh-Li, H. M. et al. Hoxa11 structure, extensive antisense transcription, and function in male and female fertility. Development 121, 1373-1385 (1995).
89. Rijli, F. M. et al. Cryptorchidism and homeotic transformations of spinal nerves and vertebrae in Hoxa-10 mutant mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 8185-8189 (1995).
90. Satokata, I., Benson, G. & Maas, R. Sexually dimorphic sterility phenotypes in Hoxa10-deficient mice. Nature 374, 460-463 (1995).
91. Katoh-Fukui, Y. et al. Male-to-female sex reversal in M33 mutant mice. Nature 393, 688-692 (1998).
92. Conradt, B. & Horvitz, H. R. The C. elegans protein EGL-1 is required for programmed cell death and interacts with the Bcl-2-like protein CED-9. Cell 93, 519-529 (1998).
93. Sulston, J. E. & Horvitz, H. R. Post-embryonic cell lineages of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev. Biol. 56, 110-156 (1977).
94. Trent, C., Tsung, N. & Horvitz, H. R. Egg-laying defective mutants of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 104, 619-647 (1983).
95. Conradt, B. & Horvitz, H. R. The TRA-1A sex determination protein of C. elegans regulates sexually dimorphic cell deaths by repressing the egl-1 cell death activator gene. Cell 98, 317-327 (1999). An impressive genetic demonstration in C. elegans that TRA-1 regulates the sexually dimorphic expression of egl-1 in one cell type by acting on an enhancer element located 5.6 kb downstream of the egl-1 coding region.
96. Ambros, V. & Horvitz, H. R. Heterochronic mutants of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Science 226, 409-416 (1984).
97. Arango, N. A., Lovell-Badge, R. & Behringer, R. R. Targeted mutagenesis of the endogenous mouse Mis promoter: in vivo definition of genetic pathways of vertebrate sexual development. Cell 99, 409-419 (1999). An elegant study using in vivo mutagenesis of conserved binding sites in the Mis promoter and careful quantification of Mis expression to assess the importance of its regulation by Sf1 and Sox9. Shows that the Sox9 site is essential for Mis expression and that the Sf1 site is less important.
98. Viger, R. S., Mertineit, C., Trasler, J. M. & Nemer, M. Transcription factor GATA-4 is expressed in a sexually dimorphic pattern during mouse gonadal development and is a potent activator of the Müllerian inhibiting substance promoter. Development 125, 2665-2675 (1998).
99. Waterbury, J. A., Jackson, L. L. & Schedl, P. Analysis of the doublesex female protein in Drosophila melonogaster. role on sexual differentiation and behavior and dependence on intersex. Genetics 152, 1653-1667 (1999).
100. Jiang, M. et al. Genome-wide analysis of developmental and sex-regulated gene expression profiles in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 218-223 (2001).
101. Bowles, J., Bullejos, M. & Koopman, P. A subtractive gene expression screen suggests a role for vanin-1 in testis development in mice. Genesis 27, 124-135 (2000).
102. Hodgkin, J. Two types of sex determination in a nematode. Nature 304, 267-268 (1983). A simple and effective demonstration that the sex-determination mechanism can be changed from XX/XO to ZZ/ZW by a pair of mutations in a single gene, resulting in a stable and fertile strain.
103. Miller, L. M., Plenefisch, J. D., Casson, L. P. & Meyer, B. J. xol-1: a gene that controls the male modes of both sex determination and X chromosome dosage compensation in C. elegans. Cell 55, 167-183 (1988).
104. Meyer, B. J. Sex in the worm; counting and compensating X-chromosome dose. Trends Genet. 16, 247-253 (2000).
105. Gray, S., Szymanski, P. & Levine, M. Short-range repression permits multiple enhancers to function autonomously within a complex promoter. Genes Dev. 8, 1829-1838 (1994).
106. Gray, S. & Levine, M. Transcriptional repression in development. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 8, 358-364 (1996).
107. Small, S., Arnosti, D. N. & Levine, M. Spacing ensures autonomous expression of different stripe enhancers in the even-skipped promoter. Development 199, 762-772 (1993).
108. Chen, P. & Ellis, R. E. TRA-1A regulates transcription of fog-3, which controls germ cell fate in C. elegans. Development 127, 3119-3129 (2000).
109. Cai, H. N., Arnosti, D. N. & Levine, M. Long-range repression in the Drosophila embryo, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 9309-9314 (1996).
110. Usui-Aoki, K. et al. Formation of the male-specific muscle in female Drosophila by ectopic fruitless expression. Nature Cell Biol. 2, 500-506 (2000).
111. Janzen, F. J. & Paukstis, G. L. Environmental sex determination in reptiles: ecology, evolution, and experimental design. Q. Rev. Biol. 66, 149-179 (1991).