Generalist predators disrupt biological control by a specialist parasitoid

Ecology

Volumn 82, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 705-716

  Snyder, W E ^a   Ives, A R ^a  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Acyrthosiphon pisum; Aphid; Aphidius ervi; Biological control; Carabid beetle; Indirect effects; Intraguild predation; Parasitoid wasp; Pterostichus melanarius; Wisconsin, USA

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL CONTROL; GENERALIST; INTRAGUILD PREDATION; NATURAL ENEMY; SPECIALIST;

ACYRTHOSIPHON PISUM; APHIDIDAE; APHIDIUS ERVI; ARTHROPODA; BRACONIDAE; CARABIDAE; COLEOPTERA; HEMIPTERA; HOMOPTERA; HYMENOPTERA; INSECTA; MEDICAGO SATIVA; PISUM; PISUM SATIVUM; PTEROSTICHUS MELANARIUS; VESPIDAE;

EID: 0035101980     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[0705:GPDBCB]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. The fallacies of ratio-dependent predation
2. Variation in selection pressures on the goldenrod gall fly and the competitive interactions of its natural enemies
3. Empirical evidence of the role of heterogeneity in ratio-dependent consumption
4. Foraging behavior and feeding preference of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) populations in Kentucky alfalfa
5. Perturbation experiments in community ecology: What are they and what can be detected?
6. The origins and evolution of predator-prey theory
7. Seasonal microhabitat selection by an endoparasitoid through adaptive modification of host behavior
8. Host behavior modification by the endoparasitoid Aphidius nigripes: A strategy to reduce hyperparasitism
9. Usurpation of host behavior by a parasitic wasp
10. Experimental community ecology: The desert granivore system
11. Comparison of single versus multiple species of generalist predators for biological control
12. The case for indigenous generalists in biological control
13. Three-way interactions: Barnacles, limpets and algae in a Sonoran desert rocky intertidal zone
14. Studies on polyphagous predators of cereal aphids
15. Arthropod predators of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum Harr. (Hom., Aphididae) in peas (Pisum sativum L.), clover (Trifolium pratense L.) and alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.)
16. Indirect interactions in biological control of insects: Pests and natural enemies in alfalfa
17. Non-additive effects of multiple natural enemies on aphid populations
18. Geographical distribution of Aphiidae (Hym.) imported to California for biological control of Acyrthosiphon kondoi and Acyrthosiphon pisum (Hom.: Aphididae)
19. Laboratory studies of the food preferences of some orchard carabids (Coleoptera: Carabidae)
20. Carabid populations in field beans and their effect on the population dynamics of Sitona lineatus (L.)
21. An evaluation of the parasitoid, Aphidius colemani Viereck (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) and the predator Aphidoletes aphidimyza Rondani (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) for biological control of Aphis gossypii Glover (Homoptera: Aphididae) on cucumber
22. Effect of the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum (Hemiptera: Aphididae), on yield and quality of forage alfalfa
23. Pea aphid resistant alfalfa selected in the field
24. Foraging strategies, population models and biological control: A case study
25. Generalist and specialist natural enemies in insect predator-prey interactions
26. Effect of epigeal predators on infestation by the aphid Rhopalosiphum padi and on grain yield of oats in monocrops and mixed intercrops
27. Interactions of the whitefly predator Delphastus pusillus (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) with parasitized sweetpotato whitefly (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae)
28. Sampling epigeal arthropods: An evaluation of fenced pitfall traps using mark-release-recapture and comparisons to unfenced pitfall traps in arable crops
29. Demographic statistics for the pea aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae) in Wisconsin and a comparison with other populations
30. Time-specific life tables for the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris), on alfalfa
31. Periodic mortality events in predator-prey systems
32. Variability and parasitoid foraging efficiency: A case study of pea aphids and Aphidius ervi
33. Ants, parasitoids, and the cabbage butterfly Pieris rapae
34. Possible consequences of a specific interaction between predators and parasites of aphids
35. The escape response of pea aphids to foliar-feeding predators: Factors affecting dropping behavior
36. Interspecific variation in the escape responses of aphids: Effect on risk of predation from foliar-foraging and ground-foraging predators
37. Positive predator-predator interactions: Enhanced predation rates and synergistic suppression of aphid populations
38. Ecology and behavior of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae)
39. Intraguild predation among aphid predators: Characterization and influence of extraguild prey density
40. Spray timing and economic threshold for the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Homoptera: Aphididae), on field peas in Manitoba
41. Adaptive suicidal behavior in pea aphids
42. Adaptive suicide in pea aphids: Decisions are cost sensitive
43. Detection of direct versus indirect effects: Were experiments long enough?
44. Apparent competition between two aphid species
45. Population regulation in theory and practice
46. Biological control in theory and practice
47. Establishment and interactions in carabid populations: An experiment with native and introduced species
48. Predatory behavior of two species of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) towards juvenile salamanders (Plethodon vehiculum)
49. Complex trophic interactions in deserts: An empirical critique of food-web theory
50. Intraguild predation: The dynamics of complex trophic interactions
51. The ecology and evolution of intraguild predation: Potential competitors that eat each other
52. Food web complexity and community dynamics
53. Interactions among Plodia interpunctella, Bracon hebetor, and Xylocoris flavipes
54. Biological control in disturbed agricultural systems and the rapid re-establishment of parasitoids
55. Influence of predators on the efficiency of the Blaesoxipha spp. Parasites of the migratory grasshopper
56. Parasitism and survival among rangeland grasshoppers in response to suppression of robber fly (Diptera: Asilidae) predators
57. Prey control by an assemblage of generalist predators: Spiders in garden test systems
58. Spiders as biological control agents
59. Decline in winter moth populations in North America: Direct versus indirect effect of introduced parasites
60. Biological control of the winter moth
61. Higher-order predators and the regulation of insect herbivore populations
62. Intraguild predation among biological-control agents: Theory and practice
63. Influence of intraguild predation among generalist insect predators on the suppression of an herbivore population
64. On the relative importance of direct versus indirect effects in ecological communities
65. Predation, competition and prey communities: A review of field experiments
66. Emergent impacts of multiple predators on multiple prey
67. Generalist predators disrupt biological control by a specialist parasitoid
68. Predator interference and the establishment of generalist predator populations for biocontrol
69. Contrasting trophic cascades generated by a community of generalist predators
70. Seasonal occurrence of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris) (Homoptera: Aphididae), on cultivars of field peas in Manitoba and its effects on pea growth and yield
71. Chrysoperla carnea predation on Heliothis virescens larvae parasitized by Microplitis croceipes
72. Are trophic cascades all wet? Differentiation and donor-control in speciose ecosystems
73. Effects of cultivation techniques and methods of straw disposal on predation by Pterostichus melanarius (Coleoptera: Carabidae) upon slugs (Gastropoda: Pulmonata) in an arable land
74. Effect of aphid predators on oviposition behavior of aphid parasitoids
75. Relationship between parasitism and predation of diprionid sawflies
76. Dynamical role of predators in population cycles of a forest insect: An experimental test
77. Aphids or their parasitoids: Who actually benefits from ant-attendance?
78. Putting the pieces together: Testing the independence of interactions among organisms