Manual asymmetries in response to rapid target movement

Brain and Cognition

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 237-253

  Carnahan, Heather ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN FUNCTION; COGNITION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FINGER; HAND MOVEMENT; HEMISPHERE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEFT HANDEDNESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGHT HANDEDNESS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0031853088     PISSN: 02782626     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/brcg.1997.0973     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Annett, J., Annett, M., Hudson, P. T. W., & Turner, A. 1979. The control of movement in the preferred and non-preferred hands. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31, 641-652.
2. Carnahan, H., Goodale, M.A., & Marteniuk, R.G. 1993. Grasping versus pointing and the differential uses of visual feedback. Human Movement Science, 12, 219-234.
3. Calvin, W. H. 1982. Did throwing stones shape hominid brain evolution? Ethology and Sociobiology, 3, 115-124.
4. Carson, R. G. 1989a. Manual asymmetries: In defense of a multifactorial account. Journal of Motor Behavior, 21, 157-162.
5. Carson, R. G. 1989b. Manual asymmetries: Feedback processing, output variability and spatial complexity. Resolving some inconsistencies. Journal of Motor Behavior, 21, 38-47.
6. Carson, R. G., Chua, R., Elliott, E., & Goodman, D. 1990. The contribution of vision to asymmetries in manual aiming. Neuropsychologia, 28, 1215-1220.
7. Carson, R. G., Goodman, D., & Elliott, D. 1992. Asymmetries in the discrete and pseudocontinuous regulation of visually guided reaching. Brain and Cognition, 18, 169-191.
8. Corballis, M. C. 1983. Human laterality. Academic Press: New York.
9. Dugas, C., & Marteniuk, R. G. 1989. Strategy and learning effects on perturbed movements: an electromyographic and kinematic study. Behavioural and Brain Research, 35, 181-193.
10. Elliott, D., Lyons, J., Chua, R., Goodman, D., & Carson, R. G. (1995). The influence of target perturbations on manual aiming asymmetries in right-handers. Cortex, 31, 685-697.
11. Fisk, J. D., & Goodale, M. A. 1985. The organization of eye and limb movements during unrestricted reaching to targets in contralateral and ipsilateral visual space. Experimental Brain Research, 60, 159-178.
12. Flowers, K. 1975. Handedness and controlled movement. British Journal of Psychology, 66, 39-52.
13. Guiard, Y., Diaz, D., & Beaubaton, D. 1983. Left hand advantage for right handers for spatial constant error: Preliminary evidence in a unimanual ballistic aiming movement. Neuropsychologia, 21, 111-115.
14. Kimura, D. 1979. Neuromotor mechanisms in the evolution of human communication. In H. D. Steklis & M. J. Raleigh (Eds.), Neurobiology of social communication in primates, New York: Academic Press.
15. Kimura, D. 1982. Left-hemisphere control of oral and brachial movements and their relation to communication. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 298, 135-149.
16. Kuypers, H. G. J. M., 1973. The anatomical organization of the descending pathways and their contributions to motor control especially in primates. In J. E. Desmedt (Ed.), New developments in electromyography and clinical neurophysiology (Vol. 3). Basel: Karger.
17. Kuypers, H. G. J. M. 1981. Anatomy of the descending pathways. In V. B. Brooks (Ed.), Handbook of physiology: Section I. The nervous system (Vol. II Motor control). Bethesda, MD: American Physiological Society.
18. Lawrence, D. G., & Kuypers, H. G. J. M. 1968. The functional organization of the motor system in the monkey: I. The effects of bilateral pyramidal lesions. Brain 91, 1-14.
19. Oldfield, R. C. 1971. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113.
20. Paulignan, Y., MacKenzie, C., Marteniuk, R. G., & Jeannerod, M. 1991. Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements: The effects of changing object position, Experimental Brain Research, 83, 502-512.
21. Peters, M. 1989. Do feedback processing, output variability and spatial complexity account for manual asymmetries? Journal of Motor Behavior, 21, 151-155.
22. Roy, E. A. 1983. Manual performance asymmetries and motor control processes: Subject-generated changes in response parameters. Human Movement Sciences, 2, 271-277.
23. Roy, E. A., & Elliott, D. 1986. Manual asymmetries in visually directed aiming. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 40, 109-121.
24. Roy, E. A., & Elliott, D. 1989. Manual asymmetries in aimed movements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, 501-516.
25. Roy, E. A., Winchester, T., Elliott, D., & Carnahan, H. 1983. Spatial variability and manual asymmetries in pointing movements. Paper presented at the Canadian Society for Psychomotor Learning and Sport Psychology Conference, Montreal, October, 1993.
26. Schmidt, R. A., Zelaznik, H. N., Hawkins, B., Frank, J. S., & Quinn, J. T. 1979. Motor output variability: A theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. Psychological Review, 86, 415-451.
27. Steklis, H. D., & Harnard, S. R. 1976. From hand to mouth: Some critical stages in the evolution of language. In S.R. Harnard, H.D. Steklis, & J. Lancaster (Eds.), Origins and evolution of language and speech. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. New York, New York: Academy of Sciences.
28. Todor, J. I., & Doane, T. 1978. Bandedness and hemispheric asymmetry in the control of movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 10, 295-300.
29. Todor, J. I., Kyprie, P. M., & Price, B. L. 1982. Lateral asymmetries in arm, wrist and finger movements. Cortex, 18, 515-523.
30. Woodworth, R. S. 1899. The accuracy of voluntary movement. Psychological Review, 3, (Supplement 2).