The arrayed primer extension method for DNA microchip analysis. Molecular computation of satisfaction problems

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 122, Issue 9, 2000, Pages 1873-1882

  Pinning, Michael C ^a   Connors, Richard V ^a   Odenbaugh, Amy L ^a   Montague Smith, Michael P ^a   Walcott, Nathan G ^b   Tollett, Jeff J ^b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PRIMER DNA;

ALGORITHM; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BASE MISPAIRING; CALCULATION; DNA DETERMINATION; DNA TEMPLATE; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 0034620765     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja992392j     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Pease, A. C; Solas, D.; Sullivan, E. J.; Cronin, M. T.; Holmes, C. P.; Fodor, S. P. A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sei. U.S.A. 1994, 91, 5022-5026.
2. Woychik, R. P.; Klebig, M. L.; Justice, M. J.; Magnuson, T. R.; Avrer, E. D. Mutât. Res. 1998, 400, 3-14.
3. Lockhart, D. J.; Mack, D. H.; Chee, M. S.; Fan, J.-B.; Wodicka, L.; Fodor, S. P. A. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 38 (Advances in Gene Technology: Molecular Biology in the Conquest of Disease); 1998; pp 11 -12.
4. Ramsay, G. Nat. Biotechnol. 1998, 16, 40-44.
5. Marshall, A.; Hodgson, J. Nat. Biotechnol. 1998, 16, 27-31.
6. Nollau, P.; Wagener, C. Clin. Cliem. {Washington, D. C.) 1997, 43, 1114-1128.
7. Southern, E. M. Trends Genet. 1996, 12, 110-115.
8. Sapolsky, R. J.; Hsie, L.; Berno, A.; Ghandour, G.; Mittmann, M.; Fan, J. B. Genet. Anal. 1999, 14, 187-192.
9. Kozian, D. H.; Kirschbaum, B. J. Trends Biotechnol. 1999,17, 7378.
10. Gerhold, D.; Rushmore, T.; Caskey, C. T. Trends Biochem. Sei. 1999, 24, 168-173.
11. Lander, E. S. Nat. Genet. 1999, 21, 3-4.
12. Hacia J. G. Nat. Genet. 1999, 21, 42-47.
13. Whitcombe, D.; Newton, C. R.; Little, S. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 1998, 9, 602-608.
14. Debouck, C.; Goodfellow. P. N. Nat. Genet. 1999, 21, 48-50.
15. Sohail, M.; Akhtar, S.; Southern, E. M. RNA 1999, 5, 646-655.
16. Maskos, U.; Southern, E. M. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993, 21, 4663.
17. Forman, J. E.; Walton, I. D.; Stern, D.; Rava, R. P.; Trulson, M. O. ACS Symp. Ser. 1998, 682, 206-228.
18. Shumaker, J. M.; Metspalu, A.; Caskey, C. T. Hum. Mutât. 1996, 7, 346-354.
19. Shumaker, J. M.; Metspalu, A.; Caskey, C. T. Laboratory Protocols for Mutation Detection; Landegren, U., Ed.; Oxford University: Oxford, UK, 1996; pp 93-95.
20. Tollett, J. J.; Kurg, A.; Shah, A.; Roa, B. B.; Richards, C. S.; Nye, S. H.; Pirrung, M.; Metspalu, A.; Shumaker, J. M. Am. J. Hum. Gen. 1997, 6/(Suppl. S), 1322.
21. Metspalu, A.; Saulep, H.; Tonisson, N.; Soo, V.; Kurg, A.; Shumaker, J. M. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1997, 67(Suppl. S), 1301.
22. Kurg, A.; Tollett, J. J.; Shah, A.; Roa, B. B.; Richards, C. S.; Nye, S. H.; Pirrung, M.; Metspalu, A.; Shumaker, J. M. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1997, 6/(Suppl. S), 68.
23. Pirrung, M. C.; Davis, J. D.; Odenbaugh, A. L. Genomics, in press.
24. Syvänen, A. C.; Ikonen, E.; Manninen, T.; Bengtstrom, M.; Söderlund, H.; Aula, P.; Peltonen, L. Genomics 1992, 12, 590-595.
25. Syvänen, A. C.; Aalto-Setälä, K.; Harju, L.; Kontula, K.; Söderlund, H. Genoniics 1990, 8, 684-692.
26. Syvänen, A. C.; Landegren, U. Hum. Mutât. 1994, 3, 172-179.
27. Pastinen, T.; Kurg, A.; Metspalu, A.; Peltonen, L.; Syvänen, A. C. Genome Res. 1997, 7, 606-614.
28. Dubiley, S.; Kirillov, E.; Mirzabekov, A. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999, 27, e19.
29. Nikiforov, T. T.; Rendle, R. B.; Goelet, P.; Rogers, Y.-H.; Kotewicz, M. L.; Anderson, S.; Trainer, G. L.; Knapp, M. R. Nucl. Acids Res. 1994, 22, 4167-4175.
30. Head, S. R.; Parikh, K.; Rogers, Y. H.; Bishai, W.; Goelet, P.; Boyce-Jacino, M. T. Mol. Cell. Probes 1999, 13, 81-87.
31. Broude, N. E.; Sano, T.; Smith, C. L.; Cantor, C. R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sei. U. S.A. 1994, 91, 3072.
32. Gunderson, K. L.; Huang, X. C.; Morris, M. S.; Lipshutz, R. J.; Lockhart, D. J.; Chee, M. S. Genome Res. 1998, 8, 1142-1153.
33. Rogers, Y. H.; Jiang-Baucom, P.; Huang, Z. J.; Bogdanov, V.; Andersen, S.; Boyce-Jacino, M. T. Anal. Biochem. 1999,260,23-30.
34. Beier, M.; Hoheisel, J. D. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999, 27, 1970-1977.
35. Hörne, D. A.; Dervan, P. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990,112, 24352437.
36. Pirrung, M. C; Fallon, L.; Lever, D. C.; Shuey, S. W. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 2129.
37. This work has been reported in preliminary form: Pirrung, M. C.; Connors, R. V.; Montague-Smith, M. P. FASEB J. 1997, // (Suppl. S), A1214.
38. Lipton, R. J. Science 1995, 268, 542.
39. Oliver, J. S. J. Mol. Evol. 1997, 45, 161.
40. Arita, M.; Suyama, A.; Hagiya, M. Genetic Programming 1997, Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Conference, Morgan Kaufmann: San Francisco, 1998; p 457.
41. Rose, J. A.; Gao, Y. A.; Garzon, M.; Murphy, E. C.; Deaton, R.; Franceschetti, D. R.; Stevens, S. E. Genetic Programming 1997, Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Conference, Morgan Kaufmann: San Francisco, 1998; p 479.
42. Adleman, L. M. Science 1994, 260, 1021.
43. Ouyang, Q.; Kaplan, P. D.; Liu, S.; Libchaber, A. Science 1997, 278, 446.
44. Garey, M. R.; Johnson, D. S. Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-compIeteness', Freeman: San Francisco, 1979.
45. A discussion of the principles of NP-complete in this context is available from our web site: http:/Annv.chem.duke.edu/pirning.
46. Gaspin, C.; Westhof, E. Advances in Molecular Bioinfonnatics; Schulze-Kremer, S., Ed.; IDS: Amsterdam, 1994; p 103.
47. Nuzillard, J.-M.; Naanaa, W.; Pimont, S. J. Chem. Inf. Compitt. Sei. 1995, 35, 1068-1073.
48. Gibbons, A.; Amos, M.; Hodgson, D. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 1997, 8, 103.
49. Hartmanis, J. Bull. Etir. Assn. Tlieor. Comput. Sei. 1995, 55, 136.
50. Deaton, R.; Garzon, M.; Murphy, R. C.; Franceschetti, D. R.; Rose, J. A.; Stevens, S. E. Genetic Programming 1997, Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Conference; Morgan Kaufmann: San Francisco, 1998; p 463.
51. Garzon, M.; Neathery, P.; Deaton, R.; Murphy, R. C.; Franceschetti, D. R.; Stevens, S. E. Genetic Programming 1997, Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Conference; Morgan Kaufmann: San Francisco, 1998; p 472.
52. Baum, E. DNA based computers; Lipton, R. J.; Baum, E. B., Eds.; American Mathematical Society: Providence, Rhode Island, D1MACS 27 1997, p 122.
53. Frutos, A. G.; Liu, Q.; Thiel, A. J.; Sanner, A. M. W.; Condon, A. E.; Smith, L. M.; Corn, R. M. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25, 4748-4757.
54. Smith, L. M.; Com, R. M.; Condon, A. E.; Lagally, M. G.; Frutos, A. G.; Liu, Q.; Thiel, A. J. J. Comput. Biol. 1998, 5, 255-267.
55. Liu, Q.; Frutos, A. G.; Thiel, A. J.; Corn, R. M.; Smith, L. M. J. Comput. Biol. 1998, 5, 269.
56. Frutos, A. G.; Smith, L. M.; Corn, R. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 10277.
57. Such problems are ubiquitous. Versions of SAT best known in the lay literature include the "pork-chop problem" and " barber-shop paradox" devised by Lewis Carroll: Symbolic logic: part I, Elementary 1896, 5th Ed.; C. N. Potter: dist. Crown Publishers: New York, 1977.
58. Kiefer, J. R.; Mao, C.; Braman, J. C.; Beese, L. S. Nature 1998, 391, 304-307.
59. n variable assignments, which can be prepared through combinatorial methods in 2n processes. Such a surface can be used in the solution of an equation involving n variables (or fewer).
60. Fodor, S. P. A.; Read, J. L.; Pirrunc, M. C.; Stryer, L.; Solas, D.; Liu, A. Science 1991, 251, 767.
61. This value was obtained by measuring by confocal fluorescence microscopy the intensity of fluorescence in the spot as well as in a dark area a short distance away from the spot and taking their ratio.
62. Cook, S. The Complexity ofjlieorem Proving Procedures, Proceedings of the 3rd Annual ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing; Association of Computing Machinery: New York, 1971.
63. This term encompasses the concept that different problems can be proved to be mathematically equivalent, and that an algorithm that can solve one such problem can be applied to any problem to which it is equivalent. Further amplification is beyond the scope of the present paper, but is available in the Supporting Material.
64. Karp, R. M. "Reducability among combinatorial problems" In Miller, R. E.; Thatcher, J. W. Complexity in Computer Computations, Plenum: New York, 1972; pp 85-103.
65. Pirrung, M. C. Chemlracls: Org. Chem. 1995, 8, 3-8.
66. Iyer, R. P.; Egan, W.; Regan, J. B.; Beaucage, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 1253-1254.
67. Because spotting was used instead of in situ synthesis, oligonucleotide solutions of x = 0 and y = 0 could be mixed together and immobilized in the NW quadrant. Similarly, mixtures of oligos x = 0 + y = I, x = 1 + y = 0 and x = 1 + y = 1 were spotted in the NE, SW, and SE quadrants, respectively.