Getting students “partially” involved in note-taking using graphic organizers

Journal of Experimental Education

Volumn 68, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 119-133

  Katayama, Andrew D ^a   Robinson, Daniel H ^b  

^a WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034341165     PISSN: 00220973     EISSN: 19400683     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00220970009598498     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Adams, H. E. (1981). Sleeping disorders. Abnormal psychology (pp. 308-316). Dubuque, IA: Brown.
2. Alvermann, D. (1981). The compensatory effect of graphic organizers on descriptive text. Journal of Educational Research, 75, 44-48.
3. Alvermann, D. (1980). Effects of graphic organizers, textual organizers, and reading comprehension level on recall of expository prose. Dissertation Abstracts International, 41, 3963A.
4. Alvermann, D. (1986). Graphic organizers: Cuing devices for comprehending and remembering main ideas. In J. F. Baumann (Ed.), Teaching main idea comprehension (pp. 210-226). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
5. Anderson, J. H., & Armbruster, B. B. (1985). Studying strategies and their implications for textbook design. In J. D. Duffy & R. Waller (Eds.), Designing usable texts (pp. 159-177). New York: Academic Press.
6. DiVesta, J. G., & Gray, S. G. (1972). Listening and notetaking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 8-14.
7. Hall, R. H., Dansereau, D. E, & Skaggs, L. P. (1992). Knowledge maps and the presentation of related information domains. The Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 5-18.
8. Hall, R. H., & Sidio-Hall, M. A. (1994a). The effect of color enhancement on knowledge map processing. The Journal of Experimental Education, 62, 209-217.
9. Hall, R. H., & Sidio-Hall, M. A. (1994b). The effect of student color coding of knowledge maps and test anxiety on student learning. The Journal of Experimental Education, 62, 291-302.
10. Hartley, J. (1983). Notetaking research: Resetting the scoreboard. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 36, 13-14.
11. Hartley, J., & Cameron, A. (1967). Some observations on the efficiency of lecturing. Educational Review, 20, 30-37.
12. Katayama, A. D., & Crooks, S. M. (1999, April). Effects of notetaking format on achievement while studying electronic text. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal.
13. Kiewra, K. A. (1989). A review of note-taking: The encoding-storage paradigm and beyond. Educational Psychology Review, 2, 147-172.
14. Kiewra, K. A., Dubois, N. F., Christian, D., & McShane, A. (1988). Providing study notes: Relation of three types of notes for review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 595-597.
15. Kiewra, K. A., Dubois, N. F., Christensen, M., Kim, S., & Lindberg, N. (1989). A more equitable account of the note-taking functions in learning from lecture and from text. Instructional Science, 18, 217-232.
16. Kiewra, K. A., Kauffman, D., Robinson D. H., Dubois, N. F., & Staley, R. K. (in press). Supplementing floundering text with adjunct aids. Journal of Instructional Science.
17. Kulhavy, R. W., Lee, B. J., & Caterino, L. C. (1985). Conjoint retention of maps and related discourse. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 10, 28-37.
18. Lambiotte, M. G„ & Dansereau, D. G. (1992). Effects of knowledge maps and prior knowledge on recall of science lecture content. The Journal of Experimental Education, 60, 189-201.
19. Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. Peper, R. J, & Mayer, R. E. (1978). Note taking as a generative activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 514-522.
21. Peper, R. J., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). Generative effects of note taking during science lectures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 34-38.
22. Rewey, K. L., Dansereau, D. F., Dees, S. M., Skaggs, L. P., & Pitre, U. (1992) Scripted cooperation and knowledge map supplements: Effects on the recall of biological and statistical information. The Journal of Experimental Education, 60, 93-107.
23. Robinson D. H. (1998). Graphic organizers as aids to text learning. Reading Research and Instruction, 37, 85-105.
24. Robinson D. H., Katayama, A. D., Dubois, N. E, & DeVaney, T. (1998). Interactive effects of graphic organizers and delayed review on concept acquisition. The Journal of Experimental Education, 67, 17-31.
25. Robinson D. H., Katayama, A. D., & Fan, A. (1996). Evidence for conjoint retention of information encoded from spatial adjunct displays. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 21, 221-239.
26. Robinson D. H., & Kiewra, K. A. (1995). Visual argument: Graphic organizers are superior to outlines in improving learning from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87. 455-467.
27. Robinson D. H., Robinson S. L., & Katayama, A. D. (1999). When words are represented in memory like pictures: Evidence for spatial encoding of study materials. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 38-54.
28. Robinson D. H., & Schraw, G. (1994). Computational efficiency through visual argument: Do graphic organizers communicate relations in text too effectively? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 399-415.
29. Robinson D. H., & Skinner, C. H. (1996). Why graphic organizers facilitate search processes: Fewer words or computationally efficient indexing? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 166-180.
30. Russell, M. D., Caris, T. N„ Harris, G. D., & Hendricson, W. D. (1983). Effects of three types of lecture notes on medical student achievement. Journal of Medical Education, 58, 627-636.
31. Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4, 295-312.
32. Sweller, J., & Chandler, P. (1991). Evidence for cognitive load theory. Cognition and Instruction, 8, 351-362.
33. Tuovincn, J. E. & Sweller, J. (1999). A comparison of cognitive load associated with discovery learning and worked examples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 334-341.
34. Wallace, D. S., West, S. W., Ware, A., & Dansereau, D. F. (1998). The effect of knowledge maps that incorporate gestalt principles on learning. The Journal of Experimental Education, 67, 5-16.
35. Wiegmann, D. A., Dansereau, D. F., McCagg, E. C., Rewey, K. L., & Pitre, U. (1992). Effects of knowledge map characteristics on information processing. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 17, 136-155.
36. Wittrock, M. C. (1990). Generative processes of comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 24, 345-376.