Graphic organizers as aids to text learning

Reading Research and Instruction

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 85-105

  Robinson, Daniel H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750053310     PISSN: 08860246     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19388079809558257     Document Type: Article

References (107)

1. Alvarez, M. C. (1983). Using a thematic pre-organizer and guided instruction as aids to concept learning. Reading Horizons, 24, 51-58.
2. Alvermann, D. (1986). Graphic organizers: Cuing devices for comprehending and remembering main ideas. In J. F. Baumann (Ed.), Teaching main idea comprehension, Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association.
3. Alvermann, D. E. (1981). The compensatory effect of graphic organizers on descriptive text. Journal of Educational Research, 75, 44-48.
4. Alvermann, D. E. (1980). Effects of graphic organizers, textual organizers, and reading comprehension level on recall of expository prose. Dissertation Abstracts International, 41, 3963A.
5. Anderson, T. H., & Armbruster, B. B. (1984). Content area textbooks. In R. C. Anderson, J. Osbom, & R. J. Tierney (Eds.), Learning to read in American schools: Basal readers and content texts (pp. 193-226). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Armbruster, B. B., & Anderson, T. H. (1982, October). Idea mapping: The technique and its use in the classroom or simulating the “ups” and “downs” of reading comprehension (Reading Education Report No. 36). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Center for the Study of Reading. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 221 842)
7. Armbruster, B. B., & Ostertag, J. (1993). Questions in elementary science and social studies textbooks. In B. K. Britton, A. Woodward, & M. R. Binkley (Eds.) Learning from textbooks: Theory and practice. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
8. Ausubel, D. R (1968). Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View, New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
9. Barnes, B. R., & Clawson, E. U. (1975). Do advance organizers facilitate learning? Review of Educational Research, 45, 637-660.
10. Barron, R. F. (1979). Research for the classroom teacher: Recent developments on the structured overview as an advance organizer. In H. L. Herber & J. D. Riley (Eds.), Research in reading in the content areas: The fourth report. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Reading and Language Arts Center.
11. Barron, R. F. (1969). The use of vocabulary as an advance organizer. In H. L. Herber & R. T. Vacca (Eds.), Research in reading in the content areas: First year report. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Reading and Language Arts Center.
12. Barron, R. F., & Cooper, R. (1973). Effects of advance organizers and grade level upon information acquisition from an instructional level general science passage. In R L. Nacke (Ed.), Diversity in mature reading: Theory and research (pp. 78-82). Clemson, SC: National Reading Conference.
13. Barron, R. F., & Stone, V. F. (1974). Effect of student-constructed graphic post organizers upon learning vocabulary relationships. In P. L. Nacke (Ed.), Interaction: Research and practice for college-adult reading (pp. 172-175). Twenty-third Yearbook of the National Reading Conference.
14. Bartlett, B. J. (1978). Top-level structure as an organizational strategy for recall of classroom text. (Prose Learning Series Research Report No. 1.) Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University.
15. Bean, T. W., Singer, H., Sorter, J., & Frazee, C. (1986). The effect of metacognitive instruction in outlining and graphic organizer construction on students’ comprehension in a tenth-grade world history class. Journal of Reading Behavior, 18, 153-169.
16. Bernard, R. M. (1990). Effects of processing instructions on the usefulness of a graphic organizer and structural cueing in text. Instructional Science, 19, 207-217.
17. Bjorklund, D. F., & Hamishfeger, K. K. (1990). Children’s strategies: Their definition and origins. In D. F. Bjorklund (Ed.) Children’s strategies: Contemporary views of cognitive development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Boothby, P. R., & Alvermann, D. E. (1984). Classroom training study: The effects of graphic organizer instruction on fourth graders’ comprehension. Reading World, 23, 325-329.
19. Brandt, D. M. (1978). Prior knowledge of the author’s schema and the comprehension of prose. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University.
20. Calfee, R. C., & Chambliss, M. J. (1987). The structural design features of large texts. Educational Psychologist, 22, 357-378.
21. Camperell, K., & Reeves, C. (1982, October). Effects of training junior college students to use networking techniques to understand and study technical texts. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the College Reading Association, Philadelphia.
22. Camperell, K., & Smith, L. L. (1982). Improving comprehension through the use of networking. Paper presented at the Southeastern Regional Conference of the International Reading Association, Biloxi, Mississippi.
23. Corkill, A. J. (1992). Advance organizers: Facilitators of recall. Educational Psychology Review, 4, 33-67.
24. Darch, C. B., Cantine, D. W., & Kameenui, E. J. (1986). The role of graphic organizers and social structure in content area instruction. Journal of Reading Behavior, 18, 275-295.
25. Davidson, J. L. (1982). The group mapping activity for instruction in reading and thinking. Journal of Reading, 26, 52-56.
26. Day, R. S. (1988). Alternative representations. In Bower, G. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Volume 22, pp. 261-303). New York: Academic Press.
27. Denner, P. R. (1986). Comparison of the effects of episodic organizers and traditional note-taking on story recall. Final Report grant no. 538, Idaho State University. ED 270 731.
28. Dennison, R. S., & Kiewra, K. A. (1993, April). Studying text supplements: Attention focusing and internal connection effects. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.
29. Diekhoff, G. M. (1983). Relation judgments in the evaluation of structural understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 227-233.
30. Dinnel, D., & Glover, J. A. (1985). Advance organizers: Encoding manipulations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 514-521.
31. Draheim, M. E. (1983, November). Facilitating comprehension and written recall of exposition through DRTA instruction and conceptual mapping. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, Austin, Texas.
32. Dunston, P. J. (1992). A critique of graphic organizer research. Reading Research and Instruction, 31, 57-65.
33. Earle, R. A. (1969). Use of structured overview in mathematics classes. In H. L. Herber & R L. Sanders (Eds.), Research in reading in the content areas: First-year report. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
34. Estes, T. H. (1971, December). The effect of advance organizers upon meaningful reception learning and retention of social studies content. Paper presented at the National Reading Conference, Tampa, Florida.
35. Estes, T. H., Mills, D. C., & Barron, R. F. (1969). Three methods of introducing student reading-learning task in two content subjects. In H. L. Herber & P. L. Sanders (Eds.), Research in reading in the content areas: First-year report. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
36. Gillis, M. K. (1985, March). Strategies for mapping content texts. Paper based on a workshop presented by M. K. Gillis and B. Longnion, 13th Annual Meeting of the Texas State Council of the International Reading Association, Dallas.
37. Graves, M. F., Cooke, C. L., & LaBerge, M. J. (1983). Effects of previewing difficult short stories on low-ability junior high school students’ comprehension, recall, and attitudes. Reading Research Quarterly, 18, 262-276.
38. Graves, M. F., & Prenn, M. C. (1984). Effects of previewing expository passages on junior high school students’ comprehension and attitudes. In J. A. Niles & L. A. Harris (Eds.), Changing perspectives on research in reading/language processing and instruction (33rd Yearbook of the National Reading Conference, pp. 173-177). Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.
39. Guri-Rosenblit, S. (1988). Impact of diagrams on recalling sequential elements in expository texts. Reading Psychology, 9, 121-139.
40. Guri-Rosenblit, S. (1989). Effects of a tree diagram on students’ comprehension of main ideas in an expository text with multiple themes. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 236-247.
41. Hartley, J., & Davies, I. K. (1976). Preinstructional strategies: The role of pretests, behavioral objectives, overviews and advance organizers. Review of Educational Research, 46, 239-265.
42. Hawk, P. P. (1986). Using graphic organizers to increase achievement in middle school life science. Science Education, 70, 81-87.
43. Herber, H. L., & Sanders, P. L. (1969). Research in reading in the content areas: first year report. Syracuse University: Reading and Language Arts Center.
44. Holley, C. D., & Dansereau, D. F. (1984). Spatial learning strategies: Techniques, applications and related issues. New York: Academic Press.
45. Huard, S. D. (1983). The effect of graphic postorganizer training on learning from text. Dissertation Abstracts International, 44, 477A.
46. Kiewra, K., Robinson, D., Dubois, N., & Staley, R. (1992b, April). Outline versus matrix representations: Memory, integration, and application effects. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
47. Kiewra, K. A., Dubois, N. F., Christian, D., & McShane, A. (1988). Providing study notes: Comparison of three types of notes for review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 595-597.
48. Kiewra, K. A., Dubois, N. F., Weiss, M, & Schantz, S. (1992a, April). Abstract and illustrative representations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
49. Kiewra, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Dubois, N. F., Christensen, M., Kim, S., & Risch, N. (1990, April). Test-appropriate effects of type of advance organizer and repetition on learning from a science lecture. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston.
50. Kiewra, K. A., & Sperling, R. A. (1991, April). How supplemental representations affect learning from a research article. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
51. Kulhavy, R. W., Stock, W. A., Peterson, S. E., Pridemore, D. R., & Klein, J. D. (1992). Using maps to retrieve text: A test of conjoint retention. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 17, 56-70.
52. Kulhavy, R. W., Lee, B. J., & Caterino, L. C. (1985). Conjoint retention of maps and related discourse. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 10, 28-37.
53. Lambiotte, J. G., Dansereau, D. F., Cross, D. R., & Reynolds, S. B. (1989). Multirelational semantic maps. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 331-367.
54. Langer, J. A. (1986). Learning through writing: Study skills in the content areas. Journal of Reading, 29, 400-406.
55. Larkin, J. H., & Simon, H. A. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11, 65-99.
56. Lehman, J. D., Carter, C., & Kahle, J. B. (1985). Concept mapping, vee mapping, and achievement: Results of a field study with black high school students. Journal of Research on Science Teaching, 22, 663-673.
57. Loman, N. L., & Mayer, R. E. (1983). Signaling techniques that increase the understand-ability of expository prose. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 402-412.
58. Long, G., & Aldersley, S. (1984). Networking: Application with hearing-impaired students. In C. D. Holley, and D. F. Dansereau (Eds.), Spatial Learning Strategies, New York: Academic Press.
59. Lorch, R. F., Jr. (1989). Text-signaling devices and their effects on reading and memory processes. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 209-234.
60. MacDonald-Ross, M. (1979). Scientific diagrams and the generation of plausible hypotheses: An essay in the history of ideas. Instructional Science, 8, 223-234.
61. Mayer, R. E. (1979). Can advance organizers influence meaningful learning? Review of Educational Research, 49, 371-383.
62. Mayer, R. E. (1980). Elaboration techniques that increase the meaningfulness of technical texts due to advance organizers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 165-173.
63. Mayer, R. E. (1984). Twenty-five years of research on advance organizers. Instructional Science, 8, 133-169.
64. Mayer, R. E. (1985). Structural analysis of science prose: Can we increase problem-solving performance? In B. K. Britton & J. B. Black (Eds.), Understanding expository prose (pp. 65-87). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
65. Mayer, R. E. (1987). Instructional variables that influence cognitive processing during reading. In B. K. Briton & S. Glynn (Eds.), Executive control processes in reading (pp. 201-216). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
66. Mayer, R. E., & Bromage, B. K. (1980). Different recall protocols for technical texts due to advance organizers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 209-225.
67. Mayer, R. E., & Gallini, J. K. (1990). When is an illustration worth ten thousand words? Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 715-726.
68. McGee, L. M. (1982). Awareness of text structure: Effects on children’s recall of expository text. Reading Research Quarterly, 17, 581-590.
69. Meyer, B. J. F. (1975). The organization of prose and its effects on memory. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co.
70. Meyer, B. J. F. (1977). The structure of prose: Effects on learning and memory and implications for educational practice. In R. C. Anderson, R. Spiro, & W. E. Montague (Eds.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
71. Meyer, B. J. F., Brandt, D. M., & Bluth, G. J. (1980). Use of top level structure in text: Key for reading comprehension for ninth grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 72-103.
72. Meyer, B. J. F., & Freedle, R. O. (1979). Effects of discourse type on recall. (Prose Learning Series Research Report No. 6.) Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University.
73. Mirande, M. J. A. (1984). Schematizing: Technique and applications. In C. D. Holley & D. F. Dansereau (Eds.), Spatial Learning Strategies, New York: Academic Press.
74. Moore, D. W., and Readance, J. E. (1984). A quantitative and qualitative review of graphic organizer research. Journal of Educational Research, 78, 11-17.
75. Murrell, P. C. (1987). Content maps and memory retrieval for main ideas from expository text. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, D.C.
76. Niles, O. S. (1965). Organization perceived. In H. L. Herber (Ed.), Perspectives in reading: Developing study skills in secondary schools. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
77. Novak, J. D., Gowin, D. B., & Johansen, G. T. (1983). The use of concept mapping and knowledge vee mapping with junior high school science students. Science Education, 67, 625-645.
78. Paivio, A. (1983). The empirical case for dual coding. In J. C. Yuille (Ed.) Imagery, memory and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 310-332.
79. Pehrsson, R. S., & Denner P. R. (1988). Semantic organizers: Implications for reading and writing. Topography of Language and Discourse, 8, 24-37.
80. Pezdek, K., Roman, Z., & Sobolik, K. G. (1986). Spatial memory for objects and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 12, 530-537.
81. Rice, G. E. (1992). The need for explanations in graphic organizer research. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, April.
82. Robinson, D. H. (1994). Textbook selection: Watch out for “inconsiderate” texts. In K. Prichard & M. Sawyer (Eds.) Handbook of College Teaching (pp. 415-422). Westport, CN: Greenwood.
83. Robinson, D. H., & Schraw, G. (1994). Computational efficiency through visual argument: Do graphic organizers communicate relations in text too effectively? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 399-415.
84. Rothkopf, E. Z. (1970). The concept of mathemagenic activities. Review of Educational Research, 40, 325-326.
85. Rothkopf, E. Z. (1971). Incidental memory for location of information in text. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 608-613.
86. Schnotz, W. (1984). Comparative instructional text organization. In W. Mandl, N. L. Stein & T. Trabasso (Eds.), Learning and comprehension of text. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
87. Simmons, D. C., Griffin, C. C., & Kameenui, E. J. (1988). Effects of teacher-constructed pre-and post-graphic organizer instruction on sixth-grade science students’ comprehension and recall. Journal of Educational Research, 82, 15-21.
88. Spiro, R. J., & Tirre, W. C. (1979). Individual differences in schema utilization during discourse processing. (Technical Report No. 111.) University of Elinois at Urbana-Cham-paign, Center for the Study of Reading.
89. Stewart, A. (1989). Structure and organization in instructional text—a cognitive perspective on practice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Educational communications and Technology, February, Dallas.
90. Surber, J. R. (1992). The effect of test expectation, subject matter, and passage length on study tactics and retention. Reading Research and Instruction, 31, 32-40.
91. Swafford, J., & Alvermann, D. E. (1989). Postsecondary research base for content strategies. Journal of Reading, 33, 164-169.
92. Taylor, B. (1979). Children’s and adults’ recall of general concepts and details after reading. In M. Kamil & A. Moe (Eds.), Reading research: Studies and applications. Clemson, SC: National Reading Conference.
93. Tennyson, R. D., & Cocciarella, M. J. (1986). An empirically based instructional design theory for teaching concepts. Review of Educational Research, 56, 40-71.
94. Thomdyke, P. W., & Stasz, C. (1980). Individual differences in prodedures for knowledge acquisition from maps. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 137-175.
95. Tukey, J. W. (1990). Data-based graphics: Visual display in the decades to come. Proceeding of the meeting of the American Statistical Association: Sequicentennial Invited Paper Sessions, 366-381, Washington, D.C.: American Statistical Association.
96. Vaughan, J. L., Jr. (1982). Use of the construct procedure to foster active reading and learning. Journal of Reading, 25, 412-422.
97. Wainer, H. (1990). Graphical visions from William Playfair to John Tukey. Statistical Science, 5, 340-346.
98. Waller, R. (1981, April). Understanding network diagrams. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, Los Angeles, April.
99. Waller, R., & Anderson, D. C. (1981). Diagrams in argument: An interdisciplinary analysis. The Open University: Institute of Educational Technology.
100. Waller, R., & Whalley, P. (1987). Graphically organized prose. In E. de Corte (Ed.), Learning and instruction: European research in an international context, (pp. 369-381). Leuven, Belgium: Leuven University Press.
101. West, C. K., Farmer, J. A., & Wolff, P. M. (1991). Instructional design: implications from cognitive science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
102. Winn, W. (1988). Recall of the pattern, sequence, and names of concepts presented in instructional diagrams. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 375-386.
103. Winn, W. D., & Holliday, W. G. (1982). Design principles for diagrams and charts. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), The technology of text (Vol. 1, pp. 277-299). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
104. Winn, W. D. (1990). A theoretical framework for research on learning from graphics. International Journal of Educational Research, 14, 553-564.
105. Winn, W. D., Li, T., & Schill, D. (1991). Diagrams as aids to problem solving: Their role in facilitating search and computation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 39, 17-29.
106. Wittrock, M. C. (1992). Knowledge acquisition and comprehension. In M. C. Alkin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational research (6th ed.) (pp. 699-705). New York: Macmillan.
107. Zimmer, J. W. (1985). Text structure and retention of prose. Journal of Experimental Education, 53, 230-233.