Recent progress in reconstructing angiosperm phylogeny

Trends in Plant Science

Volumn 5, Issue 8, 2000, Pages 330-336

  Kuzoff, Robert K ^a   Gasser, Charles S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMBORELLA; MAGNOLIOPHYTA;

EID: 0034254250     PISSN: 13601385     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1360-1385(00)01685-X     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. Dahlgren, R. and Bremer, K. (1985) Major clades of angiosperms. Cladistics 1, 349-368
2. Donoghue, M.J. and Doyle, J.A. (1989) Phylogenetic analysis of angiosperms and relationships of Hamamelidae. In Evolution, Systematics, and Fossil History of the Hamamelidae (Crane, P.R. and Blackmore, S., eds), pp. 17-45, Clarendon Press
3. Nixon, K.C. et al. (1994) A reevaluation of seed plant phylogeny. Ann. MO Bot. Gard. 81, 484-533
4. Chase, M.W. et al. (1993) Phylogenetics of seed plants: An analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL. Ann. MO Bot. Gard. 80, 526-580
5. Rice, K.A. et al. (1997) Analysing large data sets: rbcL 500 revisited. Syst. Biol. 46, 554-563
6. Soltis, D.E. et al. (1997) Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S ribosomal DNA sequences. Ann. MO Bot. Gard. 84, 1-49
7. Doyle, J.A. et al. (1994) Integration of morphological and ribosomal RNA data on the origin of angiosperms. Ann. MO Bot. Gard. 81, 419-450
8. Nandi, O.I. et al. (1998) A combined cladistic analysis of angiosperms using rbcL and non-molecular data sets. Ann. MO Bot. Gard. 85, 137-212
9. Chase, M.W. and Cox, A.V. (1998) Gene sequences, collaboration and analysis of large data sets. Aust. Syst. Bot. 11, 215-229
10. Felsenstein, J. (1978) Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Syst. Zool. 27, 401-410
11. Kim, J. (1996) General inconsistency conditions for maximum parsimony: Effects of branch lengths and increasing numbers of taxa. Syst. Biol. 45, 363-374
12. Hillis, D.M. (1996) Inferring complex phylogenies. Nature 383, 130-131
13. Graybeal, A. (1998) Is it better to add taxa or characters to a difficult phylogenetic problem? Syst. Biol. 47, 9-17
14. Rannala, B. et al. (1998) Taxon sampling and the accuracy of large phylogenies. Syst. Biol. 47, 702-710
15. Soltis, D.E. et al. (1998) Inferring complex phylogenies using parsimony: An empirical approach using three large DNA datasets for angiosperms. Syst. Biol. 47, 32-42
16. Nixon, K. (1999) The parsimony Ratchet: a rapid means for analysing large data sets. Cladistics 15, 407-414
17. Kellogg, E.A. and Juliano, N.D. (1997) The structure and function of Rubisco and their implications for systematic studies. Am. J. Bot. 84, 413-428
18. Mathews, S. and Donoghue, M.J. (1999) The root of angiosperm phylogeny inferred from duplicate phytochrome genes. Science 286, 947-949
19. Soltis, P.S. et al. (1999) Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from multiple genes as a tool for comparative biology. Nature 402, 402-404
20. Qiu, Y-L. et al. (1999) The earliest angiosperms: evidence from mitochondrial, plastid and nuclear genomes. Nature 402, 404-407
21. Parkinson, C.L. et al. (1999) Multigene analyses identify the three earliest lineages of extant flowering plants. Curr. Biol. 9, 1485-1488
22. Graham, S.W. and Olmstead, R.G. Utility of 17 chloroplast genes for inferring the phylogeny of the basal angiosperms. Am. J. Bot. (in press)
23. Savolainen, V. et al. (2000) Phylogenetics of flowering plants based upon a combined analysis of plastid atpB and rbcL gene sequences. Syst. Biol. 49, 306-362
24. Soltis, D.E. et al. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. (in press)
25. Farris, J.S. et al. (1996) Parsimony jackknifing outperforms neighbor-joining. Cladistics 12, 99-124
26. Goloboff, P. (1998) NONA, Computer Program and Software, Version 2.0, Tucuman, Argentina, P. Goloboff
27. Swofford, D.L. (1998) PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and Other Methods), Version 4.0, Sinauer
28. Huelsenbeck, J.P. and Hillis, D.M. (1996) Parametric bootstrapping in molecular phylogenetics: applications and performance. In Molecular Zoology: Advances, Strategies, and Protocols (Ferraris, J.D. and Palumbi, S.R., eds), pp. 19-45, Wiley - Liss
29. Felsenstein, J. (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39, 783-791
30. Huelsenbeck, J.P. and Rannala, B. (1997) Phylogenetic methods come of age: testing hypotheses in an evolutionary context. Science 276, 227-232
31. Yang, Z. (1997) How often do wrong models produce better phylogenies? Mol. Biol. Evol. 14, 105-108
32. Lewis, P.O. (1998) Alternatives to parsimony for inferring phylogeny using nucleotide sequence data. In Molecular Systematics of Plants (Vol. II) (Soltis, D.E. et al., eds), pp. 132-163, Kluwer
33. Doyle, J.A. and Endress, P.K., Morphological phylogenetic analysis of basal angiosperms: comparison and combination with molecular data. Int. J. Plant Sci. (in press)
34. Maddison, W.P. and Maddison, D.R. (1992) MacClade: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution, Version 3.07, Sinauer
35. Doyle, J.A. (1998) Phylogeny of vascular plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 29, 567-599
36. Donoghue, M.J. and Doyle, J.A. (2000) Seed plant phylogeny: demise of the anthophyte hypothesis? Curr. Biol. 10, R106-R109
37. Frohlich, M.W. and Parker, D.S. (2000) The mostly male theory of flower evolutionary origins: from genes to fossils. Syst. Bot. 25, 155-170
38. Lawton-Rauh, A.L. et al. (2000) Molecular evolution of flower development. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15, 144-149
39. Kramer, E.M. et al. (1998) Molecular evolution of genes controlling petal and stamen development: duplication and divergence within the APETELA3 and PISTILLATA MADS-box gene lineages. Genetics 149, 765-783
40. Kramer, E.M. and Irish, V.F. (1999) Evolution of genetic mechanisms controlling petal development. Nature 399, 144-148
41. Ambrose, B.A. et al. (2000) Molecular and genetic analyses of the Silky1 gene reveal conservation in floral organ specification between eudicots and monocots. Mol. Cell 5, 569-579
42. Soltis, D.E. and Soltis, P.S. (2000) Contributions of plant molecular systematics to studies of molecular evolution. Plant Mol. Biol. 42, 45-75
43. Villanueva, J.M. et al. (1999) Inner no outer regulates abaxial - adaxial patterning in Arabidopsis ovules. Genes Dev. 13, 3160-3169
44. Cho, Y. et al. (1998) Explosive invasion of plant mitochondria by a group I intron. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 14244-14249
45. Bennetzen, J.L. and Kellogg, E.A. (1997) Do plants have a one-way ticket to genomic obesity? Plant Cell 9, 1509-1514
46. Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (1998) An ordinal classification for families of flowering plants. Ann. MO Bot. Gard. 85, 531-553
47. Kuzoff, R.K. et al. (1998) The phylogenetic potential of entire 26S rDNA sequences in plants. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15, 251-263
48. Grass Phylogeny Working Group A phylogeny of the grass family (Poaceae), as inferred from eight character sets. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on the Comparative Biology of the Monocots: Grasses - Systematics and Evolution (Vol. 2) (Jacobs, S.W.L. and Everett, J.E., eds), CSIRO (in press)
49. Mishler, B.D. (1994) Cladistic analysis of molecular and morphological data. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 94, 143-156
50. Bininda-Emonds, O.R.P. et al. (1998) Supraspecific taxa as terminals in cladistic analysis: implicit assumptions of monophyly and a comparison of methods. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 64, 101-133
51. Mabberley, D.J. (1997) The Plant Book: A Portable Dictionary of the Vascular Plants (2nd Edn), Cambridge University Press
52. Sanderson, M.J. et al. (1998) Phylogenetic supertrees: assembling the trees of life. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13, 105-109