Stabilizing impacts in force-reflecting teleoperation using distance-to-impact estimates

International Journal of Robotics Research

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 349-364

  McAree, P R ^a   Daniel, R W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FORCE CONTROL; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; ROBOTICS; STOCHASTIC CONTROL SYSTEMS;

FORCE REFLECTING TELEOPERATORS;

MOTION CONTROL;

EID: 0034167745     PISSN: 02783649     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/02783640022066905     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Abramowitz, M., and Stegun, I. 1965. Handbook of Mathematical Functions: With Formulas, Graphs and Mathematical Tables. New York: Dover.
2. Akella, P. N., and Curkosky, M. R. 1995. Contact transition control with semiactive soft fingertips. IEEE Trans. Robotics and Automation 11(6):859-867.
3. Astrom, K. J. 1970. Introduction to Stochastic Control Theory. New York. Academic Press.
4. Brooks, T. L. 1979. SUPERMAN: A system for supervisory manipulation and the study of human computer interactions. SM thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
5. Brooks, T. L. 1990. Telerobot response requirements. A position paper on control requirements for the FTS telerobot. Rep. No. STC/ROB/90-93. STX Corporation, Lanham, MD.
6. Daniel, R. W., and McAree, P. R. 1998. Fundamental limits of performance for force reflecting teleoperation. Int. J. Robotics Research 17(8):811-830.
7. Daniel, R. W., and McAree, P. R. 2000. Multivariable stability of force-reflecting teleoperation: Structures of finite and infinite zeros. Int. J. Robotics Research 19(3):203-224.
8. Fischer, P. J. 1993. A novel input device for force control of robots. DPhil. thesis, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, UK.
9. Heuring, J. J., and Murray, D. W. 1998a. Tracking 3D pose using a Ornstein-Uhlenbeck velocity process and its application to the teleoperation of a remote stereo head. Submitted for publication in IEEE Trans. Robotics and Automation.
10. Heuring, J. J., and Murray, D. W. 1998b. Visual tracking of 3D pose using an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process: modelling the motion. Submitted forpublication in IEEE Trans. Robotics and Automation.
11. Hill, J. W. 1977. Two measures of performance in a peg-in-hole manipulation task with force feedback. Proc. 13th Annual Conf. on manual control, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
12. Kim, W. S. 1990. Shared compliant control: A stability analysis and experiments. Proc. IEEE Conf. Sys. Man, and Cybernetics, Los Angeles, CA, pp. 620-623.
13. Kim, W. S., Hannaford, B., and Bejczy, A. 1992. Force-reflection and shared compliant control in operating tele-manipulators with time delay. IEEE Trans. Robotics and Automation. 8(2):176-185.
14. Li, Y. F. 1996. A sensor-based robot transition control strategy. Int. J. Robotics Research 15(2): 128-136.
15. Massimino, M. J., and Sheridan, T. B. 1994. Teleoperator performance with varying force and visual feedback. Human Factors 36(1):145-157.
16. Murray, D. W., Reid, I. D., and Thompson, R. L. 1998. Real-time visual recovery of pose using line tracking in multiple cameras. British Machine Vision Conference, pp. 883-893.
17. Murray, R. W., Li, Z., and Sastry, S. S. 1993. A Mathematical Introduction to Robotic Manipulation. Boca Raton, FL: CRC.
18. Nelson, B., and Khosla, P. 1996. Force and vision resolvability for assimilating disparate sensory feedback. IEEE Trans. Robotics and Automation 12(5):714-731.
19. Ontañón-Ruiz, J., McAree, P. R., and Daniel, R. W. 1998. Non-minimum phase behaviour of geared transmissions: Frequency domain effects of low velocity friction. Int. J. Robotics Research 17(12):1310-1324.
20. Oppenheim, A. V., and Schafer, R. W. 1986. Digital Signal Processing. London: Prentice Hall.
21. Selig, J. M. 1996. Geometrical Methods in Robotics. New York: Springer-Verlag.
22. Sheridan, T. B. 1992. Telerobotics, Automation, and Human Supervisory Control. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Tarn, T. J., Wu., Y. Y, Xi, N., and Isidori, A. 1996. Force regulation and contact transition control. IEEE Control Systems Magazine6(1):32-40,
24. Thompson, R. L., McAree, P. R., Daniel, R. W., and Murray, D. W. 2000. The potential of synthetic viewing for improving operator performance in force reflecting teleoperation systems. In preparation.
25. Troutman, J. L. 1996. Variational Calculus and Optimal Control: Optimization with Elementary Convexity. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer.
26. Vertut, J., and Coiffet, P. 1985a. Robot Technology, Volume 3B: Teleoperation and Robotics: Applications and Technology. London: Kogan Page.
27. Vertut, J., and Coiffet, P. 1985b. Robot Technology, volume 3A: Teleoperation and Robotics: Evolution and Development. London: Kogan Page.
28. Volpe, R., and Khosla, P. 1993. A theoretical and experimental investigation of impact control for manipulators. Int. J. Robotics Research 12(4):351-365.
29. Wu, Y., Tarn, T. J., and Xi, N. 1995. Impact and transition control with environmental uncertainties. Proc. IEEE Conf. Robotics and Automation, Nagoya, Japan, pp. 899-904.