A metabolic basis for dominance and recessivity

Genetics

Volumn 143, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 621-625

  Keightley, Peter D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOMINANT INHERITANCE; EVOLUTION; GENE MUTATION; HUMAN; METABOLISM; NONHUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECESSIVE INHERITANCE; REVIEW; THEORY;

ANIMALS; EVOLUTION; GENES, DOMINANT; GENES, RECESSIVE; HUMANS; METABOLISM;

EID: 0030030193     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. CHARLESWORTH, B., 1979 Evidence against Fisher's theory of dominance. Nature 278: 848-849.
2. CORNISH-BOWDEN, A., 1987 Dominance is not inevitable. J. Theor. Biol. 125: 333-338.
3. CROW, J. F., and M. J. SIMMONS, 1983 The mutation load in Drosophila, pp. 1-35 in The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila, Vol. 3C, edited by M. ASHBURNER, H. L. CARSON and J. N. THOMPSON. Academic Press, London.
4. DYKHUIZEN, D. E., A. M., DEAN and D. L. HARTL, 1987 Metabolic flux and fitness. Genetics 115: 25-31.
5. FELL, D. A., 1992 Metabolic control analysis - a survey of its theoretical and experimental development. Biochem. J. 286: 313-330.
6. FISHER, R. A., 1928 The possible modification of the response of the wild type to recurrent mutations. Am. Nat. 62: 115-126.
7. GROEN, A. K., R. J. A. WANDERS, H. V. WESTERHOFF, R. VAN DER MEER and J. M. TAGER, 1982 Quantification of the contribution of various steps to the control of mitochondrial respiration. J. Biol. Chem. 257: 2754-2757.
8. HALDANE, J. B. S., 1930 A note on Fisher's theory of dominance. Am. Nat. 63: 87-90.
9. HARTL, D. L., D. E. DYKHUIZEN and A. M. DEAN, 1985 Limits of adaptation: the evolution of selective neutrality. Genetics 111: 655-674.
10. HEINRICH, R., and T. A. RAPOPORT, 1974 A linear steady state treatment of enzyme chains. Eur. J. Biochem. 42: 89-102.
11. HIGGINS, J., 1965 Dynamics and control in cellular reactions, pp. 13-46 in Control of Energy Metabolism, edited by B. CHANCE, R. K. ESTABROOK and J. R. WILLIAMSON. Academic Press, New York.
12. HODGKIN, J., 1993 Fluxes, doses and poisons - molecular perspectives on dominance. Trends Genet. 9: 1-2.
13. JOHNSON, R., and I. J. JACKSON, 1992 Light is a dominant mouse mutation resulting in premature cell death. Nat. Genet. 1: 226-229.
14. KACSER, H., 1963 The kinetic structure of organisms, pp. 25-41 in Biological Organisation at the Cellular and Supercellular Level, edited by R. J. C. HARRIS. Academic Press, New York and London.
15. KACSER, H., 1987 Dominance not inevitable but very likely. J. Theor. Biol. 126: 505-506.
16. KACSER, H., and L. ACERENZA, 1993 A universal method for achieving increases in metabolite production. Eur. J. Biochem. 216: 361-367.
17. KACSER, H., and J. A. BURNS, 1973 The control of flux. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 27: 65-104.
18. KACSER, H., and J. A. BURNS, 1981 The molecular basis of dominance. Genetics 97: 639-666.
19. KEIGHTLEY, P. D., 1989 Models of quantitative variation of flux in metabolic pathways. Genetics 121: 869-876.
20. KEIGHTLEY, P. D., 1996 Metabolic models of selection response. J. Theor. Biol. (in press).
21. KEIGHTLEY, P. D., and H. KACSER, 1987 Dominance, pleiotropy and metabolic structure. Genetics 117: 319-329.
22. LAPORTE, D. C., K. WALSH and D. E. KOSHLAND, Jr., 1984 The branch point effect. J. Biol. Chem. 259: 14068-14075.
23. MUKAI, T., S. I. CHIGUSA, L. E. METTLER and J. F. CROW, 1972 Mutation rate and dominance of genes affecting viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 72: 333-355.
24. NASIR, J., S. B. FLORESCO, J. R. O'KUSKY, V. M. DIEWERT, J. M. RICHMAN et al, 1995 Targeted disruption of the Huntington's disease gene results in embryonic lethality and behavioral and morphological changes in heterozygotes. Cell 81: 811-823.
25. NIEDERBERGER, P., R. PRASAD, G. MIOZZARI and H. KACSER, 1992 A strategy for increasing an in vivo flux by genetic manipulations. Biochem. J. 287: 473-479.
26. ORR, H. A., 1991 A test of Fisher's theory of dominance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88: 11413-11415.
27. SALTER, M., R. G. KNOWLES and C. I. POCSON, 1986 Quantitation of the importance of individual steps in the control of aromatic amino acid metabolism. Biochem. J. 234: 635-647.
28. SZATHMARY, E., 1993 Do deleterious mutations act synergistically? Metabolic control theory provides a partial answer. Genetics 133: 127-132.
29. WADDINGTON, C. H., 1969 Towards a Theoretical Biology. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
30. WILKIE, A. O. M., 1994 The molecular basis of genetic dominance. J. Med. Genet. 31: 89-98.
31. WILLING, M. C., C. J. PRUCHNO, M. ATKINSON and P. H. BYERS, 1992 Osteogenesis imperfecta type I is commonly due to a COL1A1 null allele of type I collagen. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 51: 508-515.
32. WRIGHT, S., 1934 Molecular and evolutionary theories of dominance. Am. Nat. 68: 24-53.