Dominance - One hundred and fifteen years after Mendel's paper

Journal of Theoretical Biology

Volumn 182, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 223-232

  Porteous, John W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIPLOIDY; DOMINANT INHERITANCE; ENZYME ACTIVITY; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC EPISTASIS; HISTORY OF MEDICINE; METABOLIC REGULATION; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PLEIOTROPY; POLYPLOIDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

EID: 0030574103     PISSN: 00225193     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.1996.0159     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. AYALA, F. J. & VALENTINE J. W. (1979). Evolving. The Theory and Processes of Organic Evolution. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/ Cummings Publishing Co.
2. BREWER, G. J. & SING, C. F. (1983). Genetics. Reading, MA: Addision-Wesley.
3. CHARLESWORTH, B. (1979). Evidence against Fisher's theory of dominance. Nature 278, 848-849.
4. CORNISH-BOWDEN, A. (1987). Dominance is not inevitable. J. theor. Biol. 125, 333-338.
5. CROSBY, J. L. (1963). The evolution and nature of dominance. J. theor. Biol. 5, 35-51.
6. DARLINGTON, P. J. (1980). Evolution for Naturalists: Simple Principles and Complex Reality. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
7. DEAN, A. M., DYKHUISEN, D. E. & HARTL, D. L. (1986). Fitness as a function of β-galactosidase activity in Escherichia coli. Genet. Res. Camb. 48, 1-8.
8. DOBZHANSKY, T. (1937). Genetics and the Evolution of Species. New York: Columbia University Press.
9. DOBZHANSKY, T. (1970). Genetics of the Evolutionary Process. New York: Columbia University Press.
10. DOBZHANSKY, T. (1975). Mankind Evolving. New Haven: Yale University Press.
11. DOBZHANSKY, T., AYALA, F. J., STEBBINS, G. L. & VALENTINE, J. W. (1977). Evolution. San Francisco: Freeman & Co.
12. DYKHUISEN, D. E., DEAN, A. M. & HARTL, D. L. (1987). Metabolic flux and fitness. Genetics 115, 25-31.
13. FISHER, R. A. (1928a). The possible modification of the response of the wild type to recurrent mutations. Amer. Nat. 62, 115-126.
14. FISHER, R. A. (1928b). Two further notes on the origin of dominance. Amer. Nat. 62, 571-574.
15. FISHER, R. A. (1929). The evolution of dominance: reply to Professor Sewall Wright. Amer. Nat. 63, 553-556.
16. FISHER, R. A. (1931). The evolution of dominance. Biol. Rev. 6, 345-368.
17. FISHER, R. A. (1934). Professor Wright on the theory of dominance. Amer. Nat. 68, 370-374.
18. FISHER, R. A. (1958). The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. New York: Dover Publications.
19. GROSSNIKLAUS, U., MADHUSUDHAN, M. S. & NANJUNDIAH, V. (1996). Nonlinear enzyme kinetics can lead to high metabolic flux control coefficients: implications for the evolution of dominance. J. theor. Biol. 182.
20. HALDANE, J. B. S. (1930). A note on Fisher's theory of the origin of dominance and a correlation between dominance and linkage. Amer. Nat. 64, 87-90.
21. HALDANE, J. B. S. (1939). The theory of the evolution of dominance. J. Genet. 37, 365-374.
22. HALDANE, J. B. S. (1956). The selection of modifiers of heterozygotes. Proc. Roy. Soc. B145, 303-306.
23. HARDIN, G. & BAJEMA, C. (1978). Biology. Its Principles and Implications. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
24. KACSER, H. (1983). The control of enzyme systems in vivo: elasticity analysis of the steady state. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 11, 35-40.
25. KACSER, H. (1987). Dominance not inevitable but very likely. J. theor. Biol. 126, 505-506.
26. KACSER, H. & BURNS, J. A. (1973). The control of flux. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 27, 65-104.
27. KACSER, H. & BURNS, J. A. (1981). The molecular basis of dominance. Genetics 97, 639-666.
28. KACSER, H. & ACERENZA, L. (1993). A universal method for achieving increases in metabolite production. Eur. J. Biochem. 216, 361-367.
29. MENDEL, G. (1866). Versuche über Pflanzenhybriden. Verhandlung des naturforschenden Vereines in Brünn 4, 3-47. (For a version in English, see Mendel, G. Experiments in Plant Hybridization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1965).
30. NIEDERBERGER, P., PRASAD, R., MIOZZARI, G. & KACSER, H. (1992). A strategy for increasing an in vivo flux by genetic manipulation. The tryptophan system of yeast. Biochem. J. 287, 473-479.
31. ROBERTS, W. J. C. (1994). Biological Inheritance. An Introductory Genetics Text. Lewes, U.K.: The Book Guild Ltd.
32. SHEPPARD, P. M. & FORD, E. B. (1966). Natural selection and the evolution of dominance. Heredity 21, 139-147.
33. SMALL, J. R. & KACSER, H. (1994). A method for increasing the concentration of a specific internal metabolite in steady-state systems. Eur. J. Biochem. 226, 649-656.
34. WRIGHT, S. (1929a). Fisher's theory of dominance. Amer. Nat. 63, 274-79.
35. WRIGHT, S. (1929b). The evolution of dominance. Comment on Dr Fisher's reply. Amer. Nat. 63, 556-561.
36. WRIGHT, S. (1934). Physiological and evolutionary theories of dominance. Amer. Nat. 63, 24-53.
37. WRIGHT, S. (1941). The physiology of the gene. Physiol. Rev. 21, 487-527.