Biotic interactions. Genomics and coevolution: Editorial overview

Current Opinion in Plant Biology

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 273-277

  Mitchell Olds, Thomas ^a   Bergelson, Joy ^b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR CHEMICAL ECOLOGY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033946921     PISSN: 13695266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1369-5266(00)00079-0     Document Type: Editorial

References (38)

1. Ehrlich P.R., Raven P.H. Butterflies and plants. a study in coevolution Evolution. 18:1964;586-608.
2. Iwao K., Rausher M.D. Evolution of plant resistance to multiple herbivores. quantifying diffuse coevolution Amer Natur. 149:1997;316-355.
3. Thompson J.N. The Coevolutionary Process. 1994;University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
4. Juenger T., Bergelson J. Pairwise versus diffuse natural selection and the multiple herbivores of scarlet gilia, Ipomopsis aggregata. Evolution. 52:1998;1583-1592.
5. Zantoko L., Shukle R.H. Genetics of virulence in the hessian fly to resistance gene H13 in wheat. J Hered. 88:1997;120-123.
6. Thompson J.N., Burdon J.J. Gene-for-gene coevolution between plants and parasites. Nature. 360:1992;121-125.
7. Rossi M., Goggin F., Milligan S., Kaloshian I., Ullman D., Williamson V. The nematode resistance gene Mi of tomato confers resistance against the potato aphid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 95:1998;9750-9754.
8. Michelmore R.W., Meyers B.C. Clusters of resistance genes in plants evolve by divergent selection and a birth-and-death process. Genome Res. 8:1998;1113-1130.
9. Pan Q., Liu Y.S., Budai-Hadrian O., Sela M., Carmel-Goren L., Zamir D., Fluhr R. Comparative genetics of nucleotide binding site-leucine rich repeat resistance gene homologues in the genomes of two dicotyledons: tomato and Arabidopsis. Genetics. 155:2000;309-322.
10. Meyers B.C., Shen K.A., Rohani P., Gaut B.S., Michelmore R.W. Receptor-like genes in the major resistance locus of lettuce are subject to divergent selection. Plant Cell. 10:1998;1833-1846.
11. Noel L., Moores T.L., van Der Biezen E.A., Parniske M., Daniels M.J., Parker J.E., Jones J.D. Pronounced intraspecific haplotype divergence at the RPP5 complex disease resistance locus of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 11:1999;2099-2112.
12. Richter T.E., Ronald P.C. The evolution of disease resistance genes. Plant Mol Biol. 42:2000;195-204.
13. McDowell J.M., Dhandaydham M., Long T.A., Aarts M.G., Goff S., Holub E.B., Dangl J.L. Intragenic recombination and diversifying selection contribute to the evolution of downy mildew resistance at the RPP8 locus of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 10:1998;1861-1874.
14. Stahl E.A., Dwyer G., Mauricio R., Kreitman M., Bergelson J. Dynamics of disease resistance polymorphism at the Rpm1 locus of Arabidopsis. Nature. 400:1999;667-671.
15. Koch M.A., Haubold B., Mitchell-Olds T. Comparative evolutionary analysis of the chalcone synthase and alcohol dehydrogenase loci among different lineages of Arabidopsis, Arabis and related genera (Brassicaceae). Mol Biol Evol. 2000;. in press.
16. Hewitt G.M. Some genetic consequences of ice ages, and their role in divergence and speciation. Biol J Linn Soc. 58:1996;247-276.
17. Frey M., Chomet P., Glawischnig E., Stettner C., Grun S., Winklmair A., Eisenreich W., Bacher A., Meeley R.B., Briggs S.P.et al. Analysis of a chemical plant defense mechanism in grasses. Science. 277:1997;696-699.
18. Hammerschmidt R. Phytoalexins: what have we learned after 60 years? Annu Rev Phytopathol. 37:1999;285-306.
19. Thomma B.P., Nelissen I., Eggermont K., Broekaert W.F. Deficiency in phytoalexin production causes enhanced susceptibility of Arabidopsis thaliana to the fungus Alternaria brassicicola. Plant J. 19:1999;163-171.
20. Zhou N., Tootle T.L., Glazebrook J. Arabidopsis PAD3, a gene required for camalexin biosynthesis, encodes a putative cytochrome P450 monooxygenase. Plant Cell. 11:1999;2419-2428.
21. Multani D., Meeley R., Paterson A., Gray J., Briggs S., Johal G. Plant-pathogen microevolution: molecular basis for the origin of a fungal disease in maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 95:1998;1686-1691.
22. Farrell B.D. 'Inordinate fondness' explained: why are there so many beetles? Science. 281:1998;555-559.
23. Farrell B.D., Mitter C. The timing of insect/plant diversification: might Tetraopes (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) and Asclepias (Asclepiadaceae) have co-evolved? Biol J Linn Soc. 63:1998;553-577.
24. Kelley S.T., Farrell B.D. Is specialization a dead end? The phylogeny of host use in Dendroctonus bark beetles (Scolytidae). Evolution. 52:1998;1731-1743.
25. Knowles L.L., Futuyma D.J., Eanes W.F., Rannala B. Insight into speciation from historical demography in the phytophagous beetle genus Ophraella. Evolution. 53:1999;1846-1856.
26. Becerra J.X. Insects on plants: macroevolutionary chemical trends in host use. Science. 276:1997;253-256.
27. Becerra J.X., Venable D.L. Macroevolution of insect-plant associations: the relevance of host biogeography to host affiliation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 96:1999;12626-12631.
28. Pellmyr O., Leebens-Mack J., Huth C.J. Non-mutualistic yucca moths and their evolutionary consequences. Nature. 380:1996;155-156.
29. Pellmyr O., Leebens-Mack J. Forty million years of mutualism: evidence for eocene origin of the yucca-yucca-moth association. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 96:1999;9178-9183.
30. Benkman C.W. The selection mosaic and diversifying coevolution between crossbills and lodgepole pine. Amer Natur. 153:1999;S75-S91.
31. Burdon J.J., Thrall P.H. Spatial and temporal patterns in coevolving plant and pathogen associations. Amer Natur. 153:1999;S15-S33.
32. Thompson J.N. Specific hypotheses on the geographic mosaic of coevolution. Amer Natur. 153:1999;S1-S14.
33. Parker M.A., Spoerke J.M. Geographic structure of lineage associations in a plant-bacterial mutualism. J Evol Biol. 11:1998;549-562.
34. Reymond P., Weber H., Damond M., Farmer E.E. Differential gene expression in response to mechanical wounding and insect feeding in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 12:2000;707-720.
35. Baldwin I.T. Jasmonate-induced responses are costly but benefit plants under attack in native populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 95:1998;8113-8118.
36. Thaler J.S. Induced resistance in agricultural crops: effects of jasmonic acid on herbivory and yield in tomato plants. Environ Entomol. 28:1999;30-37.
37. Agrawal A.A., Strauss S.Y., Stout M.J Costs of induced responses and tolerance to herbivory in male and female fitness components of wild radish. Evolution. 53:1999;1093-1104.
38. Creelman R., Mullet J. Biosynthesis and action of jasmonates in plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 48:1997;355-381.