Comparison of optimization by response surface methodology with neurofuzzy methods

IEEE Transactions on Magnetics

Volumn 36, Issue 1 PART 2, 2000, Pages 241-257

  Malik, Zahid ^a   Rashid, Kashif ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Design of experiments; Flux density and computational intelligence; Modeling; Neurofuzzy models; Optimization; Response surface models; Simulation

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FUZZY SETS; MAGNETIC DOMAINS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NEURAL NETWORKS; OPTIMIZATION;

FLUX DENSITY; NEUROFUZZY METHOD; RESPONSE SURFACE MODEL;

MAGNETIC FLUX;

EID: 0033891157     PISSN: 00189464     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/20.822535     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. L. M. Nicolai, Fundamentals of Aircraft Design. San Jose, ÇA: Mets, 1975.
2. G. E. P. Box, W. G. Hunter, and J. S. Hunter, Statistics for Experimenters. New York: Wiley, 1987.
3. Z. Malik, H. Su, and J. Neider Informative experimental design for electronic circuits, Quality Reliability Eng. Int., vol. 14, pp. 177-186, 1998.
4. W. E. Deming, Out of the Crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT, 1989.
5. P. Alotto, A. Caiti, G. Molinari, and M. Repetto A multiquadrics based algorithm for the acceleration of simulated annealing optimization procedures, IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 32, pp. 1198-1201, May 1996.
6. P. Alotto, M. Gaggero, G. Molinari, and M. Nervi A design of experiment and statistical approach to enhance the generalized response surface method in the optimization of multi-minima problems, IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 33, pp. 1896-1899, Mar. 1997.
7. P. Alotto, A. Bertoni, G. Molinari, M. Nervi, B. Brandstaetter, C. Magele, K. Richter, C. Ragusa, and M. Repetto Combined approach for the stochastic optimization of multiminima problems using adaptive fuzzy sets and radial basis functions, IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 34, pp. 2837-2840, Sept. 1998.
8. T. Ishikawa and M. Matsunami An optimization method based on radial basis function, IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 33, pp. 1868-1871, Mar. 1997.
9. T. Ebner, C. Magele, B. R. Brandstatter, M. Luschin, and P. P. Alotto Approximation of the objective function: Multiquadrics versus neural networks, in 8th Int. IGTE Symp. Numerical Field Calculation in Elec. Eng., Graz, Austria, Sept. 1998, pp. 26-32.
10. T. Ebner, C. Magele, B. R. Brandstatter, and K. R. Richter Utilizing feed forward neural networks for acceleration of global optimization procedures, IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 34, pp. 2928-2931, Sept. 1998.
11. A. Abakar, J. L. Coulomb, and Y. Maréchal Radial basis function network for acceleration of genetic algorithm optimization procedures, in 8th Int. IGTE Symp. Numerical Field Calculation in Elec. Eng., Graz, Austria, Sept. 1998, pp. 33-37.
12. G. E. P. Box and N. R. Draper, Empirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces. New York: Wiley, 1987.
13. G. Taguchi Introduction to quality engineering, in Asian Productivity Organization. Dearborn, MI, 1986.
14. G. E. P. Box Discussion of off-line quality control, parameter design and taguchi methods, J. Quality Technol., vol. 17, 1985.
15. D. C. Montgomery, Design and Analysis of Experiments. New York: Wiley, 1991.
16. J. A. Neider and R. W. M. Wedderburn Generalized linear models, J. Royal Statistical Soc. A, vol. 135, pp. 370-384, 1972.
17. P. McCullagh and J. A. Neider, Generalized Linear Models. London, U.K.: Chapman and Hall, 1989.
18. A. Dobson, An Introduction to Generalized Linear Models. London, U.K.: Chapman and Hall, 1990.
19. Z. Malik and J. Neider Modified inverse polynomial as a response surface model for magnetic flux density, Inst. Elec. Eng. Electron. Lett., vol. 34, no. 23, pp. 2252-2253, Nov. 1998.
20. H. Su, J. A. Neider, R. Spence, and M. Ismail Generalized linear models for empirical performance modeling in circuit design, in P roc. IEEE Asian-Pacific Conf. Circuits Syst., Tokyo, Japan, 1994, pp. 131-136.
21. J. J. Sacks, W. Welch, T. J. Mitchell, and H. P. Wynn Design and analysis of computer experiments, Statistical Sci., vol. 4, pp. 409-135, 1989.
22. R. A. Bates, R. J. Buck, E. Riccomagno, and H. P. Wynn Experimental design for large systems, Jo. Royal Statistical Soc. B, vol. 58, pp. 77-94, 1996.
23. H. P. Wynn and R. A. Bates Emulator technology in complex engineering environments-Keynote paper, in Design Reuse, Eng. Design Conf.'98, Brunei, Uxbridge, U.K., 1998, pp. 67-76.
24. R. Spence The facilitation of insight for analog design, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II, vol. 46, May 1998.
25. G. J. Gaston and A. J. Walton The integration of simulation and response surface methodology for the optimization of 1C processes, IEEE Trans. Semiconduct. Manufact., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 22-33, 1994.
26. A. J. Walton, D. Fallon, and D. Wilson Wafer mapping using doe and rsm techniques, in IEEE Int. Conf. Microelectron. Test Structures, Nara, Japan, 1995, pp. 33-37.
27. R.A. Bates, R. J. Buck, and H. P. Wynn Generic circuit response interpolation for robust design, in Inst. Elect. Eng. Proc. Circuit Develop. Sys., vol. 142, 1995, pp. 131-134.
28. R. Rong, D. A. Lowther, Z. Malik, H. Su, J. Neider, and R. Spence Applying response surface methodology in the design and optimization of electromagnetic devices, IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 1916-1919, 1997.
29. Z. Malik, D. Dyck, J. Neider, R. Spence, and D. A. Lowther Response surface models using function values and gradient information, with application to the design of an electro-magnetic device, in Design Reuse, Eng. Design Conf.'98, Brunei, Uxbridge, U.K., 1998, pp. 199-209.
30. Z. Malik, D. Dyck, J. Neider, R. Spence, and D. A. Lowther Modeling with gradient information, J. Eng. Manuf. B2, vol. 213, Mar. 1999.
31. D. Dyck, D. A. Lowther, Z. Malik, R. Spence, and J. Neider Response surface models of electromagnetic devices and their application to design, presented at the IEEE Conf. Electromagnetics Field Computation'98, Tuscon, AZ, 1998.
32. Response surface models of electromagnetic devices and their application to design, IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 35, pp. 1821-1824, May 1999.
33. A. Manella, M. Nervi, and M. Repetto Response surface method in magnetic optimization, Int. J. Appl. Electromagn. Materials, vol. 4, pp. 99-106, 1993.
34. G. Alotto, A. Manella, and M. Nervi A design of experiment approach to enhance the generalized response surface method in the optimization of multiminima problems, in Proc Conf. Electromagn. Field Computation'96, Tuscon, AZ, 1996.
35. R. Unal, R. A. Lepsh, W. Engelund, and D. O. Stanley Approximation model building mdo using response surface methods with applications to launch vehicle design, in Proc. 6th Annu. AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symp. Multidisciplinary Anal. Optimization, Bellevue, WA, 1996.
36. A. A. Giunta, V. Balabanov, D. Haim, B. Grossman, W. H. Mason, L. T. Watson, and R. T. Haftka Multidisciplinary optimization of a supersonic transport using design of experiments theory and response surface modeling, Aeronautical J., vol. 101, pp. 347-356, 1997.
37. L. Tweedie, M. Tyrer, A. J. Smith, Z. Malik, R. Spence, D. Read, and S. Asahara The use of interactive histogram visualisation in the interpretation of complex geochemical data sets, in Migration '97, Sendai, Japan, 1997, pp. 26-31.
38. H. Su, J. Neider, P. Wolbert, and R. Spence Application of generalized linear models to the design improvement of an engineering artifact, Quality Reliability Eng. Int., vol. 12, pp. 101-112, 1996.
39. D. Dyck and D. A. Lowther Response surface modeling of magnetic device performance using function value and gradient, Int. J. Appl. Electromagn. Mechanics, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 241-248, 1998.
40. K. Rashid, E. M. Freeman, and J. A. Ramirez Model approximation and optimization in electromagnetics using computational intelligence, in 3rd Brazilian Conf. Electromagn., Sao Paulo, Brazil, 1998.
41. [41 ] The application of computational intelligence techniques to data modeling and optimization in electromagnetics, in Inst. Grundlagen Theorie Elect'rote-chnik Symp., Graz, Austria, 1998.
42. J. S. R. Jang and C. T. Sun Neurofuzzy modeling and control, Proc. IEEE, vol. 83, pp. 37806, Mar 1995.
43. Neurofuzzy and Soft Computing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1997.
44. J. S. R. Jang Neuro-fuzzy modeling: Architecture, analyses and applications, Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. Elec. Eng. Comp. Sei, Univ. California, Berkeley, CA, 1992.
45. J. Holland, Adaption in Natural and Artificial Systems. Ann Arbor, MI: Univ. Michigan Press, 1975.
46. R. Fletcher, Practical Methods of Optimization. New York: Wiley, 1980.
47. D. E. Goldberg, Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning. New York: Addison-Wesley, 1989.
48. Genstat 5 committee, Genstat 5 Reference Manual. Oxford, U.K.: Clarendon Press, 1987.
49. J. A. Neider Inverse polynomials, a useful group of multi-factor response function, Biometrics, vol. 22, pp. 128-141, 1966.
50. S. Chiu Fuzzy model identification based on cluster estimation, J. Intelligent Fuzzy Syst., vol. 2, no. 3, Sept. 1994.
51. K. Rashid, J. A. Ramirez, and E. M. Freeman Optimization of electromagnetic devices using computational intelligence techniques, in /«termag '99-IEEE Int. Magn. Conf., Kyongju, Korea, May 1999.
52. M. Brown, K. M. Bossley, D. J. Mills, and C. J. Harris High dimensional neurofuzzy systems: Overcoming the curse of dimensionality, in IEEE Int. Conf. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 4, New York, 1995, pp. 2139-2146.