Generating polyhedral convex cones from contact graphs for the identification of assembly process states

Proceedings-IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation

Volumn 1, Issue , 2000, Pages 744-749

  Mosemann, H ^a   Bierwirth, T ^a   Wahl, F ^a   Stoeter, S A ^b  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF BRAUNSCHWEIG   (Germany)

^b University of Minnesota   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASSEMBLY PROCESS STATES; CONTACT GEOMETRY; CONTACT GRAPHS; DIFFERENTIAL ALGEBRAIC EQUATIONS; HIGH LEVEL PLANNING SYSTEM; POLYHEDRAL CONVEX CONES;

ALGEBRA; ALGORITHMS; DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; FORCE MEASUREMENT; FRICTION; IDENTIFICATION (CONTROL SYSTEMS); MANIPULATORS; SENSORS; TORQUE MEASUREMENT; VECTORS;

ROBOTIC ASSEMBLY;

EID: 0033715934     PISSN: 10504729     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/ROBOT.2000.844140     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. A. Bicchi, J. K. Salisbury, and D. L. Brock. Contact sensing from force measurment. The Znternational Journal of Robotics Research, 12(3):249-262, June 1993.
2. R. S. Desai and R. A. Volz. Identification and verification of termination conditions in fine motion in presence of sensor errors and geometric uncertainties. In ZEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 800-807, 1989.
3. S. Dutre, H. Bruyninckx, and J. De Schutter. Contact identification and monitoring based on energy. In ZEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 1333-1338, April 1996.
4. M. Erdmann. Using backprojections for fine motion planning with uncertainty. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 5(1):19-45, 1986.
5. A. J. Goldman and A. W. Tucker. Polyhedral convex cones. Annals of Math. Studies, 38:19-39, 1956
6. S. Gottschalk, M. C. Lin, and D. Manocha. Obbtree: A hierachical structure for rapid interference detection. Technical Report TR96-013, Dep.of Computer Science, University of North Carolina, 1996.
7. S. Hirai. Identification of contact states based on a geometric model for manipulative operations. Advanced Robotzcs, 8(2):139-155, 1994.
8. X. Ji and J. Xiao. Automatic generation of highlevel contact state space. In ZEEE International Conference on Robotzcs and Automateon, pages 238-244, Detroit, USA, May 1999.
9. C. Laugier. Planning fine motion strategies by reasoning in the contact space. In ZEEE International Conference on Robotzcs and Automatzon, pages 653-659, 1989.
10. T. Lozano-PCrez, M T. Mason, and R. H. Taylor. Automatic synthesis of fine-motion strategies for robots. The International Journal of Robotacs Research, 3(1):3-24, Spring 1984.
11. H Mosemann, A. Raue, and F. M. Wahl Identification of assembly process states using polyhedral convex cones. In IEEE International Conference on Robotacs and Automatzon, pages 2756-2761, Detroit, USA 1999.
12. H. Mosemann, F. Röhrdanz, and F. M. Wahl. Stability analysis of assemblies considering friction. IEEE Transactzons on Robotzcs and Automatzon, 13(6).805-813, December 1997.
13. H Mosemann, F. Röhrdanz, and F. M. Wahl. Assembly stability as constraint for assembly sequence planning. In IEEE International Conference on Robotzcs and Automatzon, pages 233-238, Leuven, Belgium, May 1998.
14. F. Röhrdanz, H. Mosemann, and F. M. Wahl. Generating und evaluating stable assembly sequences. Journal of Advanced Robotzcs, 11(2):97-126, 1997
15. J Xiao and L Zhang. A general strategy to determine geometrically valid contact formations from possible contact primitives. In IEEE International Conference on Robotzcs and Automatzon, pages 2728-2733, Nagoya, Japan, May 1995.