Genetic influences on latent inhibition

Behavioral Neuroscience

Volumn 113, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 1291-1296

  Gould, Thomas J ^b   Wehner, Jeanne M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONDITIONING; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HEREDITY; LATENT INHIBITION; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; STRAIN DIFFERENCE;

EID: 0033395113     PISSN: 07357044     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7044.113.6.1291     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual for mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2. Ammassari-Teule, M., Hoffman, H. J., & Rossi-Arnauld, C. (1993). Learning in inbred mice: Strain-specific abilities across three radial maze problems. Behavior Genetics, 23, 405-412.
3. Buhusi, C. V., Gray, J. A., & Schmajuk, N. A. (1998). Perplexing effects of hippocampal lesions on latent inhibition: A neural network solution. Behavioral Neuroscience, 112, 316-351.
4. Chiba, A. A., Bucci, D. J., Holland, P. C., & Gallagher, M. (1995). Basal forebrain lesions disrupt increments but not decrements in conditioned stimulus processing. Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 7315-7322.
5. Crawley, J. N., Belknap, J. K., Collins, A. C., Crabbe, J. C., Frankel, W., Henderson, N., Hitzemann, R. J., Maxson, S. C., Miner, L. L., Silva, A. J., Wehner, J. M., Wynshaw-Boris, A., & Paylor, R. (1997). Behavioral phenotypes of inbred mouse strains: Implications and recommendations for molecular studies. Psychopharmacology, 132, 107-124.
6. Gray, J. A., Joseph, M. H., Hemsley, D. R., Young, A. M. J., Warburton, E. C., Boulenguez, P., Grigoryan, G. A., Peters, S. L., Rawlins, J. N. P., Taib, C. T., Yee, B. K., Cassady, H., Weiner, I., Gal, G., Gusak, O., Joel, D., Shadach, E., Shalev, U., Tarrasch, R., & Feldon, J. (1995). The role of mesolimbic dopaminergic and retrohippocampal afferents to the nucleus accumbens in latent inhibition: Implications for schizophrenia. Behavioural Brain Research, 71, 19-31.
7. Hatfield, T., Han, J. S., Conley, M., Gallagher, M., & Holland, P. (1996). Neurotoxic lesions of basolateral, but not central, amygdala interfere with Pavlovian second-order conditioning and reinforcer devaluation effects. Journal of Neuroscience, 16, 5256-5265.
8. Hegman, J. P., & Possidente, B. (1981). Estimating genetic correlations from inbred strains. Behavioral Genetics, 11, 103-114.
9. Honey, R. C., & Good, M. (1993). Selective hippocampal lesions abolish the contextual specificity of latent inhibition and conditioning. Behavioral Neuroscience, 107, 23-33.
10. Joseph, M. H., Peters, S. L., & Gray, J. A. (1993). Nicotine blocks latent inhibition in rats: Evidence for a critical role of increased functional activity of dopamine in the mesolimbic system at conditioning rather than pre-exposure. Psychopharmacology, 110, 187-192.
11. Kaye, H., & Pearce, J. M. (1987). Hippocampal lesions attenuate latent inhibition and the decline of the orienting response in rats. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 39B, 107-125.
12. Kline, L., Decena, E., Hitzemann, R., & McCaughra, J., Jr. (1998). Acoustic startle, prepulse inhibition, locomotion, and latent inhibition in the neuroleptic-responsive (NR) and neuroleptic-nonresponsive (NNR) lines of mice. Psychopharmacology, 139, 322-331.
13. Levy, F., Hay, D. A., McStephen, M., Wood, C., & Waldman, I. (1997). Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: A category or a continuum? Genetic analysis of a large-scale twin study. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 36, 737-744.
14. Logue, S. F., Paylor, R., & Wehner, J. M. (1997). Hippocampal lesions cause learning deficits in inbred mice in Morris water maze and conditioned fear tasks. Behavioral Neuroscience, 111, 104-113.
15. Lubow, R. E. (1989). Latent inhibition and conditioned attention theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
16. Lubow, R. E., & Josman, Z. E. (1993). Latent inhibition deficits in hyperactive children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 34, 959-973.
17. Mackintosh, N. (1975). A theory of attention: Variations of the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82, 276-298.
18. MED-PC (Version 2.09) [Computer software]. (1994). St. Albans, VT: MED Associates.
19. Owen, E. H., Logue, S. F., Rassmussen, D. L., & Wehner, J. M. (1997). Assessment of learning by the Morris water task and fear conditioning in inbred mouse strains and F1 hybrids: Implications of genetic background for single gene mutations and quantitative trait loci analyses. Neuroscience, 80, 1087-1099.
20. Paylor, R., Baskall, L., & Wehner, J. M. (1993). Behavioral dissociation between C57BL/6 and DBA/2 mice on learning and memory tasks: A hippocampal-dysfunction hypothesis. Psychobiology, 21, 11-26.
21. Pearce, J. M., & Hall, G. (1980). A model of Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 532-552.
22. Roullet, P., & Lassalle, J. M. (1995). Radial maze learning using exclusively distant visual cues reveals learners and nonlearners among inbred mouse strains. Physiology and Behavior, 58, 1189-1195.
23. Sherman, D. K., Iacono, W. G., & McGue, M. K. (1997). Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder dimensions: A twin study of attention and impulsivity. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 36, 745-753.
24. Tai, C. T., Cassady, H. J., & Rawlins, J. N. P. (1995). Both electrolytic and excitotoxic lesions of nucleus accumbens disrupt latent inhibition of learning in rats. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 64, 36-48.
25. Upchurch, M., & Wehner, J. M. (1989). Inheritance of spatial learning ability in inbred mice: A classical genetic analysis. Behavioral Neuroscience, 103, 1251-1258.
26. Wagner, A. R. (1978). Expectancies and the priming of STM. In S. H. Hulse, H. Fowler, & W. K. Honig (Eds.), Cognitive processes in animal behavior. Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Weiner, I. (1990). Neural substrates of latent inhibition: The switching model. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 442-461.
28. Weiner, I., Tarrasch, R., & Feldon, J. (1996). Basolateral amygdala lesions do not disrupt latent inhibition. Behavioral Brain Research, 72, 73-81.
29. Yee, B. K., Feldon, J., & Rawlins, J. N. P. (1995). Latent inhibition in rats is abolished by NMDA-induced neuronal loss in the retrohippocampal region, but this lesion effect can be prevented by systemic haloperidol treatment. Behavioral Neuroscience, 109, 227-240.