Perplexing effects of hippocampal lesions on latent inhibition: A neural network solution

Behavioral Neuroscience

Volumn 112, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 316-351

  Buhusi, Catalin V ^c   Gray, J A ^a   Schmajuk, Nestor A ^b  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOPAMINE RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; HALOPERIDOL;

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONDITIONING; DOPAMINERGIC NERVE CELL; HIPPOCAMPUS; LATENT INHIBITION; MODEL; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NONHUMAN; NUCLEUS ACCUMBENS; PREDICTION; VENTRAL TEGMENTUM;

ANIMALS; ATTENTION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONDITIONING, CLASSICAL; CUES; DOPAMINE ANTAGONISTS; HALOPERIDOL; HIPPOCAMPUS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; NEURAL INHIBITION; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); RATS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0031968710     PISSN: 07357044     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7044.112.2.316     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Ackil, J., Mellgren, R. L., Halgren, C., & Frommer, S. P. (1969). Effects of CS prcexposure on avoidance learning in rats with hippocampal lesions. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 69, 739-747.
2. Ayres, J. J. B., Philbin, D., Cassidy, S., & Belling, L. (1992). Some parameters of latent inhibition. Learning and Motivation, 23, 269-287.
3. Baker, A. G. (1974). Conditioned inhibition is not the symmetrical opposite of conditioned excitation: A test of the RescorlaWagner model. Learning and Motivation, 5, 369-379.
4. Baruch, I., Hemsley, D., & Gray, J. A. (1988). Differential performance of acute and chronic schizophrenics in a latent inhibition task. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 176, 598-606.
5. Best, M. R., Gemberling, G. A., and Johnson, P. E. (1979). Disrupting the conditioned stimulus preexposure effect in flavor aversion learning: Effects of the interoceptive distractor manipulations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 5, 321-334.
6. Brogden, W. J. (1939). Sensory pre-conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 223-232.
7. Buhusi, C. V., & Schmajuk, N. A. (1996). Attention, configuration and hippocampal function. Hippocampus, 6, 621-642.
8. Bunsey, M., & Eichenbaum, H. (1996). Conservation of hippocampal memory function in rats and humans. Nature, 379, 255-257.
9. Christiansen, B. A., & Schmajuk, N. A. (1993). Latent inhibition: Effects of haloperidol and hippocampal lesions. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, 19, 798.
10. Clark, A. J. M., Feldon, J., & Rawlins, J. N. P. (1992). Aspiration lesions of rat ventral hippocampus disinhibit responding in conditioned suppression or extinction, but spare latent inhibition and the partial reinforcement extinction effect. Neuroscience, 48, 821-829.
11. Crowell, C. R., & Anderson, D. C. (1972). Variations in intensity, interstimulus interval, and interval between preconditioning CS exposures and conditioning with rats. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 79, 291-298.
12. Desmond, J. E., & Moore, J. W. (1982). Brain stem elements essential for classically conditioned but not unconditioned nictitating membrane response. Physiology and Behavior, 28, 1092-1033.
13. Gallo, M., & Candido, A. (1995). Dorsal hippocampal lesions impair blocking but not latent inhibition of taste aversion learning in rats. Behavioral Neuroscience, 109, 413-425.
14. Gluck, M. A., & Myers, C. E. (1993). Hippocampal mediation of stimulus representation: A computational theory. Hippocampus, 3, 491-516.
15. Goddard, M. (1995). Acquisition of US-no US association in Pavlovian conditioning. Learning and Motivation, 26, 264-277.
16. Good, M., & Honey, R. (1993). Selective hippocampus lesions abolish contextual specificity of latent inhibition and conditioning. Behavioral Neuroscience, 107, 23-33.
17. Gray, J. A., Buhusi, C. V., & Schmajuk, N. A. (1997). The transition from automatic to controlled processing. Neural Networks, 10, 1257-1268.
18. Gray, J. A., Feldon, J., Rawlins, J. N. P., Hemsley, D. R., & Smith, A. D. (1991). The neuropsychology of schizophrenia. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14, 20-84.
19. Gray, J. A., Joseph, M. H., Hemsley, D. R., Young, A. M. J., Warburton, E. C., Boulengez, P., Grigoryan, G. A., Peters, S. L., Rawlins, J. N. P., Taib, C-T., Yee, B. K., Cassady, H., Weiner, I., Gal, G., Joel, D., Shadach, E., Shalev, U., Tarrasch, R., & Feldon, J. (1995). The role of mesolimbic dopaminergic and retrohippocampal afferents to the nucleus accumbens in latent inhibition: Implications for schizophrenia. Behavioral Brain Research, 71, 19-31.
20. Grossberg, S. (1975). A neural model of attention, reinforcement, and discrimination learning. International Review of Neurobiology, 18, 263-327.
21. Hall, G., & Pearce, J. M. (1982). Restoring the associability of a preexposed CS by a surprising event. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 34(B), 127-140.
22. Han, J-S., Gallahger, M., & Holland, P. (1995). Hippocampal lesions disrupt decrements but not increments in conditioned stimulus processing. Journal of Neuroscience, II, 7323-7329.
23. Honey, R. C., & Good, M. (1993). Selective hippocampal lesions abolish the contextual specificity of latent inhibition and conditioning. Behavioral Neuroscience, 107, 23-33.
24. Hull, C. L. (1943). Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
25. Kaye, H., & Pearce, J. M. (1987a). Hippocampal lesions attenuate latent inhibition and the decline of the orienting response in rats. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 39(B), 107-125.
26. Kaye, H., & Pearce, J. M. (1987b). Hippocampal lesions attenuate latent inhibition of a CS and a neutral stimulus. Psychobiology, 15, 293-299.
27. Lantz, A. E. (1973). Effect of number of trials, interstimulus interval, and dishabituation on subsequent conditioning in a CER paradigm. Animal Learning and Behavior, 1, 273-277.
28. Ljungberg, T., Apicella, P., & Schultz, W. (1992). Responses of monkey dopamine neurons during learning of behavioral reactions. Journal of Neurophysiology, 67, 145-163.
29. Lubow, R. E. (1989). Latent inhibition and conditioned attention theory. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
30. Lubow, R. E., & Moore, A. U. (1959). Latent inhibition: The effect of non-reinforced preexposure to the conditional stimulus. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 52, 415-419.
31. Lubow, R. E., Rifkin, B., & Alek, M. (1976). The context effect: The relationship between stimulus preexposure and environmental preexposure determines subsequent learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 2, 38-47.
32. Lubow, R. E., Weiner, I., Schlossberg, A., & Baruch, I. (1987). Latent inhibition and schizophrenia. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 25, 464-467.
33. McFarland, D. J., Kostas, J., & Drew, W. G. (1978). Dorsal hippocampal lesions: Effects of preconditioning CS preexposure on flavor aversion. Behavioral Biology, 2, 398-404.
34. Myers, C., Gluck, M., & Granger, R. (1995). Dissociation of hippocampal and entorhinal function in associative learning: A computational approach. Psychobiology, 23, 116-138.
35. O'Keefe, J., & Nadel, L. (1978). The hippocampus as a cognitive map. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
36. O'Keefe, J., Nadel, L., & Wilner, J. (1979). Tuning out irrelevancy? Comments on Solomon's temporal mapping view of the hippocampus. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 1280-1289.
37. Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
38. Purves, D., Bonardi, C., & Hall, G. (1995). Enhancement of latent inhibition in rats with electrolytic lesions of the hippocampus. Behavioral Neuroscience, 109, 366-370.
39. Reilly, S., Grigson, P. S., & Norgren, R. (1993). Parabrachial nucleus lesions and conditioned taste aversion: Evidence supporting an associative deficit. Behavioral Neuroscience, 107, 1005-1017.
40. Reilly, S., Harley, C., & Revusky, S. (1993). Ibotenate lesions of the hippocampus enhance latent inhibition in conditioned taste aversion and increase resistance to extinction in conditioned taste preference. Behavioral Neuroscience, 107, 966-1004.
41. Rudy, J. W., Rosenberg, L., and Sandell, J. H. (1977). Disruption of taste familiarity effect by novel exteroceptive stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 88, 665-669.
42. Schmajuk, N. A. (1987). Animal models for schizophrenia: The hippocampally lesioned animal. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 13, 317-327.
43. Schmajuk, N. A. (1990). Role of the hippocampus in temporal and spatial navigation: An adaptive neural network. Behavioral Brain Research, 39, 205-229.
44. Schmajuk, N. A., & Blair, H. T. (1993). Stimulus configuration, spatial learning, and hippocampal function. Behavioural Brain Research, 59, 103-117.
45. Schmajuk, N. A., & Blair, H. T. (1994). Time, space, and the hippocampus. In N. E. Spear, L. P. Spear, & M. Woodruff (Eds.), Neurobehavioral plasticity: Learning, development, and response to brain insult (pp. 33-56). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
46. Schmajuk, N. A., & Buhusi, C. V. (1997). Occasion setting, stimulus configuration, and the hippocampus. Behavioral Neuroscience, 111, 235-258.
47. Schmajuk, N. A., Buhusi, V. C., & Gray, J. A. (1997). The neuropharmacology of latent inhibition: A neural network approach. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, 23, 564.
48. Schmajuk, N. A., & DiCarlo, J. J. (1991). A neural network approach to hippocampal function in classical conditioning. Behavioral Neuroscience, 105, 82-110.
49. Schmajuk, N. A., & DiCarlo, J. J. (1992). Stimulus configuration, classical conditioning, and the hippocampus. Psychological Review, 99, 268-305.
50. Schmajuk, N. A., Lam, P., & Christiansen, B. A. (1994). Hippocampectomy disrupts latent inhibition of the rat eyeblink conditioning. Physiology and Behavior, 55, 597-601.
51. Schmajuk, N. A., Lam, Y. W., & Gray, J. A. (1996). Latent inhibition: A neural network approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 321-349.
52. Schmajuk, N. A., & Moore, J. W. (1988). The hippocampus and the classically conditioned nictitating membrane response: A realtime attentional-associative model. Psychobiology, 46, 20-35.
53. Schmajuk, N. A., & Tyberg, M. (1991). The hippocampal-lesion animal model of schizophrenia. In M. E. Boulton, G. Baker, & M. T. Martin Iverson (Eds.), Animal models in psychiatry (pp. 67-102). Clifton, NJ: Humana Press.
54. Schmajuk, N. A., & Zanutto, B. S. (1997). Escape, avoidance, and imitation: A neural network approach. Adaptive Behavior, 6, 63-129.
55. Schnur, P., & Lubow, R. E. (1976). Latent inhibition: The effects of ITI and CS intensity during preexposure. Learning and Motivation, 7, 540-550.
56. Schultz, W., Apicella, P., & Ljundberg, T. (1993). Responses of monkey dopamine neurons to reward and conditioned stimuli during successive steps of learning a delayed response task. Journal of Neuroscience, 13, 900-913.
57. Solomon, P. R., & Moore, J. W. (1975). Latent inhibition and stimulus generalization of the classically conditioned nictitating membrane response in rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) following dorsal hippocampal ablation. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 89, 1192-1203.
58. Thompson, R. F. (1986). The neurobiology of learning and memory. Science, 233, 941-947.
59. Wickens, C., Tuber, D. S., &, Wickens, D. D. (1983). Memory for the conditioned response: The proactive effect of preexposure to potential conditioning stimuli and context change. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 41-57.
60. Williams, G. V., Rolls, E. T., Leonard, C. M., & Stern, C. (1993). Neuronal responses in the ventral striatum of the behaving monkey. Behavioural Brain Research, 55, 243-252.
61. Yee, B. K., Feldon, J., & Rawlins, J. N. P. (1995). Latent inhibition in rats is abolished by NMDA-induced neuronal loss in the retrohippocampal region, but this lesion effect can be prevented by systemic haloperidol treatment. Behavioral Neuroscience, 109, 227-240.
62. Zimmer-Hart, C. L., & Rescorla, R. A. (1974). Extinction of Pavlovian conditioned inhibition. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 86, 837-845.