Structure and assembly of the spliceosomal small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles

Current Opinion in Structural Biology

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 222-230

  Kambach, Christian ^a   Walke, Stefan ^a   Nagai, Kiyoshi ^a  

^a MRC LABORATORY OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RNA BINDING PROTEIN; SMALL NUCLEAR RIBONUCLEOPROTEIN; SMALL NUCLEAR RNA;

COMPLEX FORMATION; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN RNA BINDING; REVIEW; SPLICEOSOME;

EID: 0033117879     PISSN: 0959440X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-440X(99)80032-3     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Moore MJ, Query C, Sharp PA: Splicing of precursors to messenger RNAs by the spliceosome. In The RNA World. Edited by Gesteland RF, Atkins JF. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1993:303-357.
2. Burge CB, Tuschi TH, Sharp PA: Splicing of precursors to mRNAs by the spliceosome. In The RNA World, edn 2. Edited by Gesteland RF, Cech T, Atkins JF. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1999:525-560.
3. Baserga SJ, Steitz JA: The diverse world of small ribonucleoproteins. In The RNA World, edn 2. Edited by Gesteland RF, Cech T, Atkins JF. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1993:359-381.
4. Staley JP, Guthrie C: Mechanical devices of the spliceosome: Motors, clocks, springs, and things. Cell 1998, 92:315-326.
5. Qin PZ, Pyle AM: The architectural organization and mechanistic function of group II intron structural elements. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1998, 8:301-308.
6. Madhani HD, Guthrie C: Dynamic RNA-RNA interactions in the spliceosome. Annu Rev Genet 1994, 28:1-26.
7. Newman AJ, Norman C: U5 snRNA interacts with exon sequences at 5′ and 3′ splice sites. Cell 1992, 68:743-754.
8. Sontheimer EJ, Steitz JA: The U5 and U6 small nuclear RNAs as active site components of the spliceosome. Science 1993, 262:1989-1996.
9. O'Keefe RT, Norman C, Newman AJ: The invariant U5 snRNA loop 1 sequence is dispensable for the first catalytic step of splicing in yeast. Cell 1996, 86:679-689.
10. Will CL, Lührmann R: Protein functions in pre-mRNA splicing. Curr Opin Cell Biol 1997, 9:320-328.
11. Krämer A: The structure and function of proteins involved in mammalian pre-mRNA splicing. Annu Rev Biochem 1996, 65:367-409.
12. Müller S, Wolpensinger B, Angenitzki M, Engel A, Sperling J, Sperling R: A supraspliceosome model for large nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles based on mass determinations by scanning transmission electron microscopy. J Mol Biol 1998, 283:383-394.
13. Brody E, Abelson J: The 'spliceosome': Yeast pre-messenger RNA associates with a 40S complex in a splicing-dependent reaction. Science 1985, 228:963-967.
14. Frendewey D, Keller W: Stepwise assembly of a pre-mRNA splicing complex requires U-snRNPs and specific intron sequences. Cell 1985, 42:355-367.
15. Grabowski PJ, Seiler SR, Sharp PA: A multicomponent complex is involved in the splicing of messenger RNA precursors. Cell 1985, 42:345-353.
16. Beggs JD: Yeast splicing factors and genetics strategies for their analysis. In Pre-mRNA Processing. Edited by Lamond Al. Austin, TX: RG Landes Co; 1995:79-95.
17. Lührmann R, Kastner B, Bach M: Structure of spliceosomal snRNPs and their role in pre-mRNA splicing. Biochim Biophys Acta 1990, 1087:265-292.
18. Nagai K, Mattaj IW: RNA-protein interactions in the splicing snRNPs. In RNA-protein Interactions. Edited by Nagai K, Mattaj IW. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1994:150-177.
19. Mermoud JE, Cohen PTW, Lamond AI: Regulation of mammalian spliceosome assembly by a protein phosphorylation mechanisms. EMBO J 1994, 13:5679-5688.
20. Tazi J, Kornstädt U, Rossi F, Jeanteur P, Cathala G, Brunel C, Lührmann R: Thiophosphorylation of U1-70K protein inhibits pre- mRNA splicing. Nature 1993, 363:283-286.
21. Gate JH, Gooding AR, Podell E, Zhou K, Golden BL, Kundrot CE, Cech TR, Doudna JA: Crystal structure of a group I ribozyme domain: Principles of RNA packing. Science 1996, 273:1678-1685.
22. Golden BL, Gooding AR, Podell ER, Cech TR: A preorganized active site in the crystal structure of the Tetrahymena ribozyme. Science 1998, 282:259-264. This work presents the largest RNA crystal structure determined so far. The 247-nucleotide group I intron RNA folds into two separate domains that closely pack together. The remaining cleft can bind a helical region of the 5′ splice site. The authors also identify the binding site for the catalytically important guanosine cofactor. This study provides the first example of an RNA structure in which the active site is preorganised and ready for catalysis. Such a structural organisation has so far only been known for protein enzymes and should help to close the gap between the RNA and protein world even further.
23. Chu J-L, Elkon KB: The small nuclear ribonucleoproteins, SmB and B′, are products of a single gene. Gene 1991, 97:311-312.
24. van Dam A, Winkel I, Zijlstra Baalbergen J, Smeenk R, Cuypers HT: Cloned human snRNP proteins B and B′ differ only in their carboxy-terminal part. EMBO J 1989, 8:3853-3860.
25. Séraphin B: Sm and Sm-like proteins belong to a large family: Identification of proteins of the U6 as well as the U1, U2, U4 and U5 snRNPs. EMBO J 1995, 14:2089-2098.
26. Hermann H, Fabrizio P, Raker VA, Foulaki K, Hornig H, Brahms H, Lührmann R: snRNP Sm proteins share two evolutionarily conserved sequence motifs which are involved in Sm protein-protein interactions. EMBO J 1995, 14:2076-2088.
27. Cooper M, Johnston LH, Beggs JD: Identification and characterization of Uss1p (Sdb23p): A novel U6 snRNA-associated protein with significant similarity to core proteins of small nuclear ribonucleoproteins. EMBO J 1995, 14:2066-2075.
28. Raker VA, Plessel G, Lührmann R: The snRNP core assembly pathway: Identification of stable core protein heteromeric complexes and an snRNP subcore particle in vitro. EMBO J 1996, 15:2256-2269.
29. Mattaj IW, De Roberte EM: Nuclear segregation of U2 snRNA requires binding of specific snRNP proteins. Cell 1985, 40:111-118.
30. Fischer U, Darzynkiewicz E, Tahara SM, Dathan NA, Lührman R, Mattaj IW: Diversity of signals required for nuclear accumulation of U snRNPs and variety in the pathways of nuclear transport. J Cell Biol 1991, 113:705-714.
31. Palacios I, Hetzer M, Adam SA, Mattaj IW: Nuclear import of U snRNPs requires importin beta. EMBO J 1997, 16:6783-6792. The nuclear import of U small nuclear ribonucleoproteins (snRNPs) depends on the trimethylguanosine cap and the fully assembled core domain. The addition of the importin-β-binding domain of importin α inhibited nuclear import of U snRNP, whereas the depletion of importin α stimulated U snRNP import. The authors concluded that the nuclear import of U snRNP is mediated by importin β.
32. 2 complexes are also conserved. The authors propose that all the Sm proteins interact in the manner observed in the two dimer structures. They proposed a core domain model in which all seven core proteins form a closed ring-like structure. The high density of positive charges around the inner ring suggests a potential binding site for the RNA. The model shows a similar size and appearance to those of the core snRNPs observed by electron microscopy.
33. 1, E, F and G) assemble around the Sm site in U1, U2, U4 and U5 small nuclear RNAs and form a globular core domain. A yeast two-hybrid screen was used to find pairwise interactions between the yeast Sm proteins. Furthermore, site-directed mutagenesis was used to identify residues within the E protein that are important for its interaction with the F and G proteins.
34. •]
35. Heinrichs V, Hackl W, Lührmann R: Direct binding of small nuclear ribonucleoprotein G to the Sm site of small nuclear RNA. Ultraviolet light cross-linking of protein G to the AAU stretch within the Sm site (AAUUUGUGG) of U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein reconstituted in vitro. J Mol Biol 1992, 227:15-28.
36. Jarmolowski A, Mattaj IW: The determinants for Sm protein binding to Xenopus U1 and U5 snRNAs are complex and non-identical. EMBO J 1993, 12:223-232.
37. Kastner B, Bach M, Lührmann R: Electron microscopy of small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (snRNP) particles U2 and U5: Evidence for a common structure-determining principle in the major U snRNP family. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990, 87:1710-1714.
38. Kastner B: Purification and electron microscopy of spliceosomal snRNPs. In RNP Particles, Splicing and Autoimmune Disease. Edited by Schenkel J. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 1998:95-140.
39. Klenk HP, Clayton RA, Tomb J-F, White O, Nelson KE, Ketchum KA, Dodson RJ, Gwinn M, Hickey EK, Peterson JD et al.: The complete genome sequence of the hyperthermophilic sulphate-reducing archaeon Archaeoglobus fulgidus. Nature 1997, 390:364-370,
40. Scherly D, Boelens W, van Venrooij WJ, Dathan NA, Hamm J, Mattaj IW: Identification of the RNA binding segment of human U1A protein and definition of its binding site on U1 snRNA. EMBO J 1989, 8:4163-4170.
41. Scherly D, Boelens W, Dathan NA, van Venrooij WJ, Mattaj IW: Major determinants of the specificity of interaction between small nuclear ribonucleoprotein-U2B′ and their cognate RNAs. Nature 1990, 345:502-506.
42. Oubridge C, Ito N, Evans PR, Teo HC, Nagai K: Crystal structure at 1.92 Å resolution of the RNA-binding domain of the U1A spliceosomal protein complexed with an RNA hairpin. Nature 1994, 372:432-438.
43. Nagai K, Oubridge C, Jessen TH, Li J, Evans PR: Crystal structure of the RNA-binding domain of the U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein Å. Nature 1990, 348:515-520.
44. Query CC, Bentley RC, Keene JD: A common RNA recognition motif identified within a defined U1 RNA binding domain of the 70K U1 snRNP protein. Cell 1989, 57:89-101.
45. Nelissen RL, Will CL, van Venrooij WJ, Lührmann R: The association of the U1-specific 70K and C proteins with U1 snRNPs is mediated in part by common U snRNP proteins. EMBO J 1994, 13:4113-4125.
46. Nelissen RLH, Heinrichs V, Habets WJ, Simons F, Lührmann R, van Venrooij WJ: Zinc finger-like structure in U1-specific protein C is essential for specific binding to U1 snRNP. Nucleic Acids Res 1991, 19:449-454.
47. Heinrichs V, Bach M, Winkelmann G, Lührmann R: U1-specific protein C needed for efficient complex formation of U1 snRNP with a 5′ splice site. Science 1990, 247:69-72.
48. Kastner B, Kornstädt U, Bach M, Lührmann R: Structure of the small nuclear RNP particle U1 : Identification of the two structural protuberances with RNP-antigens A and 70K. J Cell Biol 1992, 116:839-849.
49. Caspary F, Séraphin B: The yeast U2A′/U2B′ complex is required for pre-spliceosome formation. EMBO J 1998, 17:6348-6358. An open reading frame (LEA1) encoding a protein with striking similarities to the human U2A′ protein was found in the yeast genome sequence database. This protein associates with U2 small nuclear RNA only in the presence of Yib9p, the yeast counterpart of the human U2B″ protein. In the absence of LEA1, spliceosome assembly is blocked prior to the addition of the U2 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein. This demonstrates that U2B″ (Yib9p) and U2A′ (LEA1) are required for the formation of the pre-spliceosome.
50. Yu YT, Shu MD, Steitz JA: Modifications of U2 snRNA are required for snRNP assembly and pre-mRNA splicing. EMBO J 1998, 17:5783-5795. The U2 small nuclear (sn)RNA undergoes extensive post-transcriptional modifications and contains 2′-O-methylated residues and pseudouridines towards the 5′ end, as well as the 5′ trimethylguanosine cap. Various fragments of natural U2 snRNA were produced by oligonucleotide-directed RNase H cleavage and were then joined with unmodified in vitro transcribed RNA in order to produce chimaeric full-length U2 snRNAs. The ability of modified RNAs to assemble into a fully functional U2 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (snRNP) was assessed. It was found that modifications of the first 27 residues were important for full assembly into functional U2 snRNPs.
51. Price SR, Evans PR, Nagai K: Crystal structure of the spliceosomal U2B′-U2A′ protein complex bound to a fragment of U2 small nuclear RNA. Nature 1998, 394:645-650. This crystal structure determination provides further insight into RNA recognition. It gives an example of two highly homologous proteins, evolved from a common ancestor, that highly discriminate between similar target RNAs. The authors compare the crystal structures of the U2B″-U2A′ complex with the U1A complex, each bound to their cognate RNA hairpin loop. Only a few amino acid substitutions between U2B″ and U1A result in very specific RNA-binding properties. A detailed analysis reveals how complex formation with U2A′ modulates the RNA-binding specificity of U2B″. This interaction allows key amino acid residues to specifically recognise U2 small nuclear (sn)RNA elements that are different from U1 snRNA and explains the observed specificity.
52. Kobe B, Deisenhofer J: Structural basis of the interactions between leucine-rich repeats and protein ligands. Nature 1995, 374:183-186.
53. Scherly D, Dathan NA, Boelens W, van Venrooij WJ, Mattaj IW: The U2B′ RNP motif as a site of protein-protein interaction. EMBO J 1990, 9:3675-3681.
54. Kastner B, Bach M, Lührmann R: Electron microscopy of snRNPs U2, U4/6 and U5: Evidence for a common structure-determining principle in the major U snRNP family. Mol Biol Rep 1990, 14:171.
55. Kastner B, Bach M, Lührmann R. Electron microscopy of U4/U6 snRNP reveals a Y-shaped U4 and U6 RNA containing domain protruding from the U4 core RNP. J Cell Biol 1991, 112:1065-1072.
56. Liu ZR, Laggerbauer B, Lührmann R, Smith CWJ: Crosslinking of the U5 snRNP-specific 116 kDa protein to RNA hairpins that block step 2 of splicing. RNA 1997, 3:1207-1219. The first AG dinucleotide downstream of the branch point is usually used as the 3′ splice site, suggesting that a 5′→3′ scanning process occurs from the branch point to locate the 3′ splice site. The authors found that the insertion of a stable hairpin between the branch point and 3′ splice site blocks the second step of splicing. Using methylene blue, which induces double-stranded RNA specific UV cross-linking, the authors found that the US-specific 116 kDa protein can be cross-linked to pre-mRNA containing a stable hairpin between the branch point and the 3′ splice site. This experiment supports the scanning mechanism and suggests a possible role for the U5 116 kDa protein in pre-mRNA splicing.
57. Chiara MD, Gozani O, Bennett M, Champion-Arnaulk P, PaLandjian L, Reed R: Identification of proteins that interact with exon sequences, splice sites, and the branchpoint during each stage of spliceosome assembly. Mol Cell Biol 1996, 16:3317-3326.
58. Reyes JL, Kois P, Konforti BB, Konarska MM: The canonical GU dinucleotide at the 5′ splice site is recognised by p220 of the U5 snRnp within the spliceosome. RNA 1996, 2:213-225.
59. Teigelkamp S, Newman AJ, Beggs G: Extensive interactions of PRP8 protein with the 5′ and 3′ splice sites during splicing suggest a role in stabilization of exon alignment by U5 snRNA. EMBO J 1995, 14:2602-2612.
60. Dix I, Russell CS, O'Keefe RT, Newman AJ, Beggs JD: Protein-RNA interactions in the U5 snRNP of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. RNA 1998, 4:1675-1686. The yeast U5 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (snRNP) was reconstituted using U5 small nuclear RNA either uniformly or site-specifically labelled with photoactivatable 4-thiouridine. After UV irradiation, cross-linked proteins were identified using antibodies or tagged proteins, providing important information on the architecture of the U5 snRNP.
61. Neubauer G, King A, Rappsilber J, Calvio C, Watson M, Ajuh P, Sleeman J, Lamond A, Mann M: Mass spectrometry and EST-database searching allows characterization of the multi-protein spliceosome complex. Nat Genet 1998, 20:46-50. A method that allows the rapid characterisation of the protein components of a large protein assembly such as the spliceosome is described. A biotinylated pre-mRNA substrate was used to purify the spliceosome using affinity chromatography. Individual proteins were isolated from a two-dimensional gel and were rapidly characterised by mass spectrometry and an expressed sequence tag (EST) database search.
62. Fromont-Racine M, Tain JC, Legrain P: Towards a functional analysis of the yeast genome through exhaustive two-hybrid screens. Nat Genet 1997, 16:277-282. A yeast two-hybrid screen was used to characterise an extensive network of protein-protein interactions within the spliceosomal small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (snRNP). The authors have revealed the protein components of the yeast U1 and U2 snRNPs and their interactions. This method has proved useful in studying the architecture of the snRNPs.
63. Ban N, Freeborn B, Nissen P, Penczek P, Grassucci RA, Sweet R, Frank J, Moore PB, Steitz TA: A 9 Å resolution X-ray crystallographic map of the large ribosomal subunit. Cell 1998, 93:1105-1115. The authors present the results of their crystallographic studies on the large 50S ribosomal subunit of Haloarcula marismortui. A combination of 20 Å resolution electron microscopy image maps and a large, 18 atom tungsten cluster for heavy-atom phasing yields an electron density map at 9 Å resolution. This map shows more details than anything previously reported. Long, continuous features of the map are consistent with stretches of double-stranded helical RNA. Finally, the molecular architecture of the ribosome begins to reveal its secrets.
64. Ramakrishnan V, White SW: Ribosomal protein structures: Insights into the architecture, machinery and evolution of the ribosome. Trends Biochem Sci 1998, 23:208-212.