"Base flipping": Photodamaged DNA-RNA duplexes are poor substrates for photoreactivating DNA-repair enzymes

Angewandte Chemie - International Edition

Volumn 38, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 708-711

  Butenandt, Jens ^a   Burgdorf, Lars T ^a   Carell, Thomas ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

DNA repair; DNA structures; DNA RNA hybrids photolyases; UV photolesions

Indexed keywords

DEOXYRIBODIPYRIMIDINE PHOTOLYASE; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA; DOUBLE STRANDED RNA;

ARTICLE; DNA CONFORMATION; DNA DAMAGE; DNA DENATURATION; DNA REPAIR; DNA RNA HYBRIDIZATION; ENZYME KINETICS; ENZYME REACTIVATION; ENZYME SPECIFICITY; ENZYME SUBSTRATE COMPLEX; EXCISION REPAIR; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; NUCLEIC ACID STRUCTURE; PHOTOREACTIVATION; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 0033105505     PISSN: 14337851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1521-3773(19990301)38:5<708::aid-anie708>3.0.co;2-8     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. a) T. Lindahl, Nature 1993, 362, 709-715;
2. b) P. F. Heelis, R. F. Hartman, S. D. Rose, Chem. Soc. Rev. 1995, 289-297;
3. c) T. P. Begley, Acc. Chem. Res. 1994, 27, 394-401;
4. d) T. Carell, Chimia 1995, 49, 365-373;
5. e) T. Carell, Angew. Chem. 1995, 107, 2697-2700;
6. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 2491-2494.
7. a) H. W. Thielmann, Recent Results in Cancer Research: Skin Carcinogenesis in Man and in Experimental Models, Vol. 128, Springer, Heidelberg, 1993;
8. b) J.-S. Taylor, J. Chem. Educ. 1990, 67, 835-841;
9. c) J.-S. Taylor, Acc. Chem. Res. 1994, 27, 76-82.
10. a) E. C. Friedberg, G. C. Walker, W. Siede, DNA Repair and Mutagenesis, ASM Press, Washington, DC, 1995;
11. b) A. Sancar, Science 1994, 266, 1954-1956;
12. c) A. Sancar, J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 15915-15918;
13. d) A. Sancar, Biochemistry 1994, 33, 2-9.
14. a) L. Daya-Grosjean, N. Dumaz, A. Sarasin, J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 1995, 28, 115-124;
15. b) A. J. Nataraj, J. C. Trent II, H. N. Ananthaswamy, Photochem. Photobiol. 1995, 62, 218-230;
16. c) S. Tornaletti, G. P. Pfeifer, Science 1994, 263, 1436-1438.
17. a) R. S. Lloyd, X. Cheng, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 1998, 4, 139-151;
18. b) R. J. Roberts, Cell 1995, 82, 9-12;
19. c) G. L. Verdine, S. D. Bruner, Chem. Biol. 1997, 4, 329-334;
20. d) evidence for base flipping with photolyases see reference [19] and: B. J. van de Berg, G. B. Sancar, J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 20276-20284;
21. D. Ramaiah, Y. Kan, T. Koch, H. Ørum, G. B. Schuster, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 12902-12905.
22. a) B. Suter, M. Livingstone-Zatchej, F. Thoma, EMBO J. 1997, 16, 2150-2160;
23. b) R. E. Wellinger, F. Thoma, EMBO J. 1997, 16, 5056-5056.
24. Z. Livneh, O. Cohen-Fix, R. Skaliter, T. Elizur, Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1993, 28, 465-513.
25. Such hybrid duplexes are biologically relevant during DNA transcription, DNA replication, and RNA reverse transcription. For a detailed investigation of their conformation see for example: a) M. Egli, N. Usman, A. Rich, Biochemistry 1993, 32, 3221-3237;
26. b) M. Egli, N. Usman, S. Zhang, A. Rich, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1992, 89, 534-538.
27. 3′-endo conformation. See for expamle: a) L. Ratmeyer, R. Vinayak, Y. Y. Zhong, G. Zon, W. D. Wilson, Biochemistry 1994, 33, 5298-5304;
28. b) J. I. Gyi, G. L. Conn, A. N. Lane, T. Brown, Biochemistry 1996, 36, 12538-12548.
29. A. S. Kamath-Loeb, A. Hizi, J. Tabone, M. S. Solomon, L. A. Loeb, Eur. J. Biochem. 1997, 250, 492-501.
30. Other repair systems show also increased activity with increasing duplex instability. See for example: a) C. P. Selby, A. Sancar, Science 1993, 260, 53-58;
31. b) X. Zhao, J. Liu, D. S. Hsu, S. Zhao, J.-S. Taylor, A. Sancar, J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 32580-32590;
32. c) D. Mu, M. Tursun, D. R. Duckett, J. T. Drummond, P. Modrich, A. Sancar, Mol. Cell. Biol. 1997, 17, 760-789;
33. d) M. T. Hess, U. Schwitter, M. Petretta, B. Giese, H.-P. Nägeli, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 6663-6669;
34. e) D. L. Svoboda, C. A. Smith, J.-S. A. Taylor, A. Sancar, J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 268, 10694-10700.
35. a) J. M. Veal, X. Gao, F. K. Brown, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 7139-7145;
36. b) X. Gao, F. K. Brown, P. Jeffs, N. Bischofberger, K. Y. Lin, A. Pipe, S. A. Noble, Biochemistry 1992, 31, 6228-6236.
37. J. Butenandt, A. P. M. Eker, T. Carell, Chem. Eur. J. 1998, 4, 642-653.
38. a) I. Husain, G. B. Sancar, S. R. Holbrock, A. Sancar, J. Biol. Chem. 1987, 262, 13188-13197;
39. b) S.-T. Kim, A. Sancar, Biochemistry 1991, 30, 8623-8630;
40. c) a small effect of the counter strand on the binding by photolyases was reported by: A. Kiener, I. Husain, A. Sancar, C. Walsh, J. Biol. Chem. 1989, 264, 13880-13887;
41. d) of photolyases to a DNA-DNA double strand: D. L. Svoboda, C. A. Smith, J.-S. Taylor, A. Sancar, J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 258, 10694-10700.
42. a) K. B. Hall, L. W. McLaughlin, Biochemistry 1991, 30, 10606-10613;
43. b) L. Ratmeyer, R. Vinayak, Y. Y. Zhong, G. Zon, W. D. Wilson, Biochemistry 1994, 33, 5298-5304;
44. c) J. I. Gyi, G. L. Conn, A. N. Lane, T. Brown, Biochemistry 1996, 35, 12538-12548.
45. L. A. Marky, K. J. Breslauer, Biopolymers 1987, 26, 1601-1620.
46. a) F. N. Hayes, D. L. Williams, R. L. Ratliff, A. J. Varghese, C. S. Rupert, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1971, 93, 4940-4942;
47. b) F. Barone, A. Bonincontro, F. Mazzei, A. Minoprio, F. Pedone, Photochem. Photobiol. 1995, 61, 61-67;
48. c) J.-S. Taylor, D. S. Garrett, I. R. Brockie, D. L. Svoboda, J. Telser, Biochemistry 1990, 29, 8858-8866.
49. a) J. Kemmink, R. Boelens, T. Koning, G. A. van der Marel, J. H. van Boom, R. Kaptein, Nucleic Acids Res. 1987, 15, 4645-4653;
50. b) J. Kemmink, R. Boehlens, T. M. G. Koning, R. Kaptein, G. A. van der Marel, J. H. van Boom, Eur. J. Biochemistry 1987, 162, 37-43;
51. c) J.-K. Kim, D. Patel, B.-S. Choi, Photochem. Photobiol. 1995, 62, 44-50.
52. a) T. I. Spector, T. E. Cheatham III, P. A. Kollman, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 7095-7104;
53. b) M. G. Cooney, J. H. Miller, Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25, 1432-1436;
54. c) H. Yamaguchi, D. M. F. van Aalten, M. Pinak, A. Furukawa, R. Osman, Nucleic Acids Res. 1998, 26, 1939-1946;
55. d) K. Miaskiewicz, J. Miller, M. Cooney, R. Osman, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 9156-9163.
56. All thermodynamic experiments were performed in Tris/HCl buffer. ΔG is reported at 15°C. This allows the thermodynamic data to be compared more directly with the enzymatic repair kinetics, which were performed in a phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) at 15°C.
57. For X-ray structures see: a) H.-W. Park, S.-T. Kim, A. Sancar, J. Deisenhofer, Science 1995, 268, 1866-1872;
58. b) T. Tamada, K. Kitadokoro, Y. Higuchi, K. Inaka, A. Yasui, P. E. de Ruiter, A. P. M. Eker, K. Miki, Nature Struct. Biol. 1997, 11, 887-891.