K-12 science education reform - A primer for scientists

BioScience

Volumn 49, Issue 7, 1999, Pages 569-576

  Moreno, Nancy P ^a  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032997233     PISSN: 00063568     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/1313477     Document Type: Review

References (47)

1. Allard DW, Barman CR. 1994. The learning cycle as an alternative method for college science teaching. BioScience 44: 99-101.
2. [AAAS] American Association for the Advancement of Science. 1993. Benchmarks for Science Literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. [APS] American Physiological Society. 1999. Education. >www.faseb.org/aps/educate. htm< (26 January 1999).
4. Bybee RW. 1997. Achieving Science Literacy: From Purposes to Practice. Portsmouth (NH): Heinemann.
5. Carin AA, Sund RB. 1989. How can you improve your questioning and answering skills? Pages 152-173 in Teaching Science Through Discovery. 6th ed. Columbus (OH): Merrill Publishing Company.
6. Clark M. 1996. A successful university-school-district partnership to help San Francisco's K-12 students learn about science and medicine. Academic Medicine 71: 950-956.
7. Cohen EG, Kepner D, Swanson P. 1995. Dismantling status hierarchies in heterogeneous classrooms. Pages 16-31 in Oakes J, Quartz KH, eds. Creating New Educational Communities. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
8. Darling-Haamond L, McLaughlin M. 1995. Polices that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan April: 597-604.
9. Elstgeest J. 1985. The right question at the right time. Pages 36-46 in Harlen W, ed. Primary Science: Taking the Plunge. Chicago: Heinemann Educational.
10. Hackett J. 1998. Inquiry: Both means and ends. The Science Teacher 65: 35-37.
11. Hein GE, Price S. 1994. Active Assessment for Active Science. Portsmouth (NH): Heinemann.
12. Herreid CF. 1998. Why isn't cooperative learning used to teach science? BioScience 48: 553-559.
13. Jones RM. 1990. Teaming Up! LaPorte (TX): ITGROUP.
14. Karplus F, Thier HD. 1967. A New Look at Elementary School Science. Chicago: Rand McNally.
15. Lapp DM. 1980. The need for teacher support systems. The National Elementary Principal January: 61-66.
16. Lowery L. 1990. The Biological Basis of Thinking and Learning. Berkeley (CA): Lawrence Hall of Science.
17. Maienschein J, Burger I, Enshaie R, Glitz M, Kevern K, Maddin B, Rivera M, Rutowski D, Shindell M, Unger A. 1998. Scientific literacy. Science 281: 917.
18. Marek EA, Cavallo AML. 1997. The Learning Cycle: Elementary School Science and Beyond. Portsmouth (NH): Heinemann.
19. Moore R. 1997. National goals and the training of teachers. American Biology Teacher 59: 4.
20. Moreno N, Tharp B. 1999. A national interdisciplinary project developed at Baylor to make science exciting for all K-5 students. Academic Medicine 74: 41-43.
21. Moreno N, Tharp B, Clay C. 1997. Reducing barriers to integration of multimedia with K-6 science and mathematics instruction in inner city schools. Pages 1715-1717 in Müldner N, Reeves TC, eds. Educational Multimedia/Hypermedia and Telecommunications. Vol. 2. Charlottesville (VA): Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
22. [NAS] National Academy of Sciences. 1999. Resources for Involving Scientists in Education. >www.nas.edu/rise/< (26 January 1999).
23. [NBPTS] National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. 1999. The National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. >www.nbpts.org< (8 January 1999).
24. [NCES] National Center for Educational Statistics. 1996. Pursuing Excellence: A Study of US Eighth-Grade Mathematics and Science Teaching, Learning, Curriculum, and Achievement in International Context. Washington (DC): US Government Printing Office.
25. _. 1998. Pursuing Excellence: A Study of US Twelfth-Grade Mathematics and Science Teaching, Learning, Curriculum, and Achievement in International Context. Washington (DC): US Government Printing Office.
26. [NRC] National Research Council. 1996. National Science Education Standards. Washington (DC): National Academy Press.
27. _. 1997. Introducing the National Science Education Standards. Washington (DC): National Academy Press.
28. _. 1998. Every Child a Scientist: Achieving Scientific Literacy for All. Washington (DC): National Academy Press.
29. [NSF] National Science Foundation. 1997a. The challenge and promise of K-8 science education reform. Foundations 1: 1-99.
30. _. 1997b. Guide to Programs Fiscal Year 1998. Washington (DC): National Science Foundation. Publication no. 97-150.
31. _. 1998. Division of Undergraduate Education Program Announcement and Guidelines. Washington (DC): National Science Foundation. Publication no. 98-45.
32. _. 1999. Despite increases, women and minorities still underrepresented in undergraduate and graduate S&E education. Division of Science Resources Studies Data Brief. January 15. Washington (DC): National Science Foundation. Publication no. 99-320.
33. [NSRC] National Science Resources Center. 1997. Science for All Children: A Guide to Improving Science Education in Your School District. Washington (DC): National Academy Press.
34. ™ and the National Science Education Standards. Burlington (NC): Carolina Biological Supply Company.
35. [NSTA] National Science Teachers Association. 1999. NSTA Teacher Certification. Position Paper. >www.nsta.org/about/ teacher.htm< (8 January 1999).
36. O'Sullivan CY, Reese CM, Maazeo J. 1997. NAEP 1996 Science Report Card for the Nation and the States. Washington (DC): National Center for Educational Statistics.
37. Penick JE. 1995. New goals for biology education. BioScience 45 (Supplement): S52-S57.
38. Pratt H. 1998. Focusing on achievement: Lessons from the TIMSS report. Science Teacher 65: 30-33.
39. Rutherford J, Ahlgren A. 1989. Science for All Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
40. Schmidt WH, McKnight CC, Raizen SA. 1996. Splintered Vision: An Investigation of US Science and Mathematics Education. US National Center for the Third International Mathematics and Science Study, Michigan State University. Hingham (MA): Kluwer Academic Publishers.
41. Slavin RE. 1995. Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research and Practice. 2nd ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
42. Snow CE, Burns SM, Griffin P, eds. 1998. Predictors of success and failure in reading. Pages 100-133 in Snow CE, Burns SM, Griffin P, eds. Predicting Reading Difficulties in Young Children. Washington (DC): National Academy Press.
43. Society for Neuroscience. 1999. Committee on Neuroscience Literacy Activities: Society for Neuroscience Meeting. >www.sfn. org/cnl/sfnwork.html< (15 April 1999).
44. Stiles KE, Loucks-Horsley S. 1998. Professional development strategies. The Science Teacher 65: 46-49.
45. Uno GE, Bybee RW. 1994. Understanding the dimensions of biological literacy. BioScience 44: 553-557.
46. Vogel G. 1996. Global review faults US curricula. Science 274: 335.
47. Wheeler G. 1998. The wake-up call we dare not to ignore. Science 279: 1611.