Regulation of T cell fate by Notch

Annual Review of Immunology

Volumn 17, Issue , 1999, Pages 283-295

  Robey, Ellen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Lineage committment; Notch ligands; Positive selection; T cell development; Thymus

Indexed keywords

MEMBRANE PROTEIN;

CELL FATE; CELL LINEAGE; CELL MATURATION; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; HELPER CELL; LYMPHOCYTE DIFFERENTIATION; MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGULATORY MECHANISM; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; T LYMPHOCYTE SUBPOPULATION;

ANIMALS; CD4-POSITIVE T-LYMPHOCYTES; CD8-POSITIVE T-LYMPHOCYTES; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; HUMANS; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MUTATION; RECEPTORS, ANTIGEN, T-CELL; RECEPTORS, NOTCH; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; T-LYMPHOCYTES;

EID: 0032968707     PISSN: 07320582     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.17.1.283     Document Type: Review

References (66)

1. Greenwald I. 1994. Structure/function studies of lin-12/Notch proteins. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 1994:556-62
2. Artavanis-Tsakonas S, Matsuno K, Fortini M. 1995. Notch signaling. Science 268:225-32
3. Kimble J, Simpson P. 1997. The Lin12/ Notch signalling pathway and its regulation. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 13:333-61
4. Robey E. 1997. Notch in vertebrates. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 7:551-57
5. Chitnis A, Henrique D, Lewis J, Ish-Horowicz D, Kintner C. 1995. Primary neurogenesis in Xenopus embryos regulated by a homologue of the Drosophila neurogenic gene Delta. Nature 375:761-66
6. Henrique D, Adam J, Myat A, Chitnis A, Lewis J, Ish-Horowicz D. 1995. Expression of a Delta homologue in prospective neurons in the chick. Nature 375:787-90
7. Lindsell C, Shawber C, Boulter J, Weinmaster G. 1995. Jagged: a mammalian ligand that activates Notch1. Cell 80:909-17
8. Bettenhausen B, Hrabe de Angelis M, Simon D, Guenet J-L, Gossler A. 1995. Transient and restricted expression during mouse embryogenesis of DII1, a murine gene closely related to Drosophila Delta, Development 121:2407-18
9. Shawber C, Boulter J, Lindsell C, Weinmaster G. 1996. Jagged2: a serrate-like gene expressed during rat embryogenesis, Dev. Biol. 180:370-76
10. Myat A, Henrique D, Ish-Horowicz D, Lewis J. 1996. A chick homologue of Serrate and its relationship with Notch and Delta homologues during central neurogenesis. Dev. Biol. 174:233-47
11. Jen W-C, Wettstein D, Turner D, Chitnis A, Kintner C. 1997. The Notch ligand, X-Delta-2, mediates segmentation of the paraxial mesoderm in Xenopus embryos. Development 124:1169-78
12. Dunwoodie S, Henrique D, Harrison S, Beddington R. 1997. Mouse DII3: a novel divergent Delta gene which may complement the function of other Delta homologues during early pattern formation in the mouse embryo. Development 124:3065-76
13. Li L, Milner LA, Yu D, Iwata M, Banta A, et al. 1998. The human homolog of rat Jagged1 expressed by marrow stroma inhibits differentiation of 32D cells through interaction with Notch1. Immunity 8:43-55
14. Schweisguth F, Posakony J. 1992. Suppressor of Hairless, the Drosophila homolog of the mouse recombination signal-binding protein gene, controls sensory organ cell fates. Cell 69:1199-1212
15. Fortini ME, Artavanis-Tsakonas S. 1994. The suppressor of Hairless protein participates in Notch receptor signaling. Cell 79:273-82
16. Christensen S, Kodoyianni V, Bosenberg M, Friedman L, Kimble J. 1996. lag-1, a gene required for lin-12 and glp-1 signaling in C. elegans, is homologous to human CBF1 and Drosophila Su(H). Development 122:1373-83
17. Jarriault S, Brou C, Logeat F, Schroeter E, Kopan R, Israel A. 1995. Signalling downstream of activated mammalian Notch. Nature 377:355-58
18. Tamura K, Taniguchi Y, Minoguchi S, Sakai T, Tun T, et al. 1995. Physical interaction between a novel domain of the receptor Notch and the transcription factor RBP-Jk/Su(H). Curr. Biol. 5:1416-23
19. Hsieh JJD, Henkel T, Salmon P, Robey E, Peterson MG, Hayward D. 1996. Truncated mammalian Notch1 activates CBF1/RBPJk repressed genes by a mechanism resembling that of Epstein-Barr virus EBNA2. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:952-59
20. Struhl G, Adachi A. 1998. Nuclear access and action of Notch in vivo. Cell 93:649-60
21. Schroeter E, Kisslinger J, Kopan R. 1998. Notch-1 signalling requires ligand-induced proteolytic release of intracellular domain. Nature 393:382-86
22. Lecourtois M, Schweisguth F. 1995. The neurogenic Suppressor of Hairless DNA-binding protein mediates the transcriptional activation of Enhancer of split complex genes triggered by Notch signaling. Genes Dev. 9:2598-2608
23. Bailey A, Posakony J. 1995. Suppressor of Hairless directly activates transcription of Enhancer of split complex genes in response to Notch receptor activity. Genes Dev. 9:2609-22
24. de Celis JF, de Celis J, Ligoxygakis P, Priess A, Delidakis C, Bray S. 1996. Functional relationships between Notch, Su(H) and the bHLH genes of the E(spl) complex: the H(spl) genes mediate only a subset of Notch activities during imaginal development. Development 122:2719-28
25. de la Poma J, Wakeman A, Correla K, Samper E, Brown S, et al. 1997. Conservation of the Notch signaling pathway in mammalian neurogenesis. Development 124:1139-48
26. Wettstein D, Turner D, Kintner C. 1997. The Xenopus homolog of Drosophila Suppressor of Hairless mediates Notch signaling during primary neurogenesis. Development 124:693-702
27. Ellisen LW, Bird J, West DC, Soreng AL, Reynolds TC, et al. 1991. TAN-1, the human homolog of the Drosophila Notch gene, is broken by chromosomal translocations in T lymphoblastic neoplasms. Cell 66:649-61
28. Weinmaster G, Roberts VJ, Lemke G. 1991. A homologue of Drosophila Notch expressed during mammalian development. Development 113:199-205
29. Hasserjian R, Aster J, Davi D, Weinberg D, Sklar J. 1996. Modulated expression of Notch1 during thymocyte development. Blood 88:970-76
30. Robey E, Chang D, Itano A, Cado D, Alexander H, et al. 1996. An activated form of Notch influences the choice between CD4 and CD8T cell lineages. Cell 87:483-92
31. Lardelli M, Dahlstrand J, Lendahl U. 1994. The novel Notch homologue mouse Notch 3 lacks specific epidermal growth factor-repeats and is expressed in proliferating neuroepithelium. Mech. Dev. 46:123-36
32. Luo B, Astar J, Hasserjian R, Kuo F, Sklar J. 1997. Isolation and functional analysis of a cDNA for human Jagget2, a gene encoding a ligand for the Notch1 receptor. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:6057-67
33. Washburn T, Schweighoffer E, Gridley T, Chang D, Fowlkes B, et al. 1997. Notch activity influences the αβ vs. γδ T cell lineage decision. Cell 88:833-43
34. Robey E, Fowlkes B. 1998. The αβ versus γδ T-cell lineage choice. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 10:181-87
35. Struhl G, Fitzgerald K, Greenwald I. 1993. Intrinsic activity of the Lin-12 and Notch intracellular domains in vivo. Cell 74:331-45
36. Rebay I, Fehon R, Artavanis-Tsakonas S. 1993. Specific truncations of Drosophila Notch define dominant activated and dominant negative forms of the receptor. Cell 74:319-29
37. Lieber T, Kidd S, Alcamo E, Corbin V, Young M. 1993. Antineurogenic phenotypes induced by truncated Notch proteins indicate a role in signal transduction and may point to a novel function for Notch in nuclei. Genes Dev. 7:1949-65
38. Roehl H, Kimble J. 1993. Control of cell fate in C. elegans by a GLP-1 peptide consisting primarily of ankyrin repeats. Nature 364:632-35
39. Sentman CL, Shutter JR, Hockenbery D, Kanagawa O, Korsmeyer S. 1991. bcl-2 inhibits multiple forms of apoptosis but not negative selection in thymocytes. Cell 67:879-88
40. Egerton M, Scollay R, Shortman K. 1990. Kinetics of mature T-cell development in the thymus, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87: 2579-82
41. Huesmann M, Scott B, Kisielow P, von Boehmer H. 1991. Kinetic and efficacy of positive selection in the thymus of normal and T cell receptor transgenic mice. Cell 66:533
42. Jameson SC, Hogquist K, Bevan M. 1995. Positive selection of thymocytes. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 13:93-126
43. Marrack P, Kappler J. 1997. Positive selection of thymocytes bearing alpha-beta T cell receptors. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 9: 250-55
44. Seydoux G, Greenwald I. 1989. Cell autonomy of lin-12 function in a cell fate decision in C. elegans. Cell 57:1237-45
45. Heitzler P, Simpson R. 1991. The choice of cell fate in the epidermis of Drosophila. Cell 64:1083-92
46. Wilkinson H, Fitzgerald K, Greenwald I. 1994. Reciprocal changes in expression of the receptor lin-12 and its ligand prior to commitment in a C. elegans cell fate decision. Cell 79:1187-98
47. Simpson P. 1997. Notch signalling in development: on equivalence groups and assymetric developmental potential. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 7:537-42
48. Horvitz H, Sternberg P. 1991. Multiple intercellular signalling systems control the development of the Caenorhabditis elegans vulva. Nature 351:535-41
49. Simske J, Kim S. 1995. Sequential signalling during Caenorhabditis elegans vulval development. Nature 375:142-46
50. Levitan D, Greenwald I. 1998. LIN-12 protein expression and localization during vulval development in C. elegans. Development 125:3101-9
51. Kimble J, White J. 1981. On the control of germ cell development in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev. Biol. 81:208-19
52. Henderson S, Gao E, Lambie E, Kimble J. 1994. lag-2 may encode a signaling ligand for the GLP-1 and LIN-12 receptors of C. elegans. Development 120:2913-24
53. Tax F, Yeargers J, Thomas J. 1994. Sequence of C. elegans lag-2 reveals a cell-signalling domain shared with Delta and Serrate of Drosphila. Nature 368:150-3
54. Newman AP, White JG, Sternberg PW. 1995. The C. elegans lin-12 gene mediates induction of ventral uterine specialization by the anchor cell. Development 121:263-71
55. Spana E, Doe C. 1996. Numb antagonizes Notch signaling to specify sibling neuron cell fates. Neuron 17:21-26
56. Campos-Ortega J. 1996. Numb diverts Notch pathway of the tramtrack. Neuron 17:1-4
57. Jan Y, Jan L. 1995. Maggot's hair and bug's eye: role of cell interactions and intrinsic factors in cell fate specification. Neuron 14:1-5
58. Robey EA, Fowlkes BJ. 1994. Selective events in T cell development. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 12:675-705
59. Itano A, Salmon P, Kioussis D, Tolaini M, Corbella P, Robey E. 1996. The cytoplasmic domain of CD4 promotes the development of CD4 lineage T cells. J. Exp. Med. 183:731-41
60. Matechak E, Killeen N, Hedrick S, Fowlkes B. 1996. MHC class II-specific T cells can develop in the CD8 lineage when CD4 is absent. Immunity 4:337-47
61. Sharp LL, Schwarz DA, Bou CM, Marshall CJ, Hedrick SM. 1997. The influence of the MAPK pathway on T cell lineage commitment. Immunity 7:609-18
62. Jiang R, Lan Y, Chapman H, Shawber C, Norton C, Serreze D, Weinmaster G, Gridley T. 1998. Defects in limb, craniofacial, and thymic development in Jagged2 mutant mice. Genes Dev. 12:1046-57
63. Girard L, Hanna Z, Beaulieu N, Hocmann N, Hoemann C, Simard C, Kozak C, Jolicoeur P. 1996. Frequent provirus insertional mutagenesis of Notch1 in thymomas of MMTVD/myc transgenic mice suggests a collaboration of c-myc and Notch1 for oncogenesis. Genes Dev. 10: 1930-44
64. Takahama Y, Tokoro Y, Sugawara T, Negishi I, Nakauchi H. 1997. Pertussis toxin can replace T cell receptor signals that induce positive selection of CD8 T cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 27:3318-31
65. + cytotoxic T cells. Nature 344:742-46
66. + T cells in major histocompatibility complex class II-deficient mice. Science 253:1417-20