P300 from a single-stimulus paradigm: Passive versus active tasks and stimulus modality

Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology - Evoked Potentials

Volumn 104, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 488-497

  Mertens, Ralf ^a   Polich, John ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Active passive tasks; Auditory visual stimuli; Clinical applied; Event related potential (ERP); P300; Single stimulus paradigm

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STUDENT; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS, P300; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0031281319     PISSN: 01685597     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-5597(97)00041-5     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Bruder G.E., Tenke C., Stewart J., Towey J., Leite P., Voglmaier M., Quitkin F. Brain event-related potentials to complex tones in depressed patients: relations to perceptual asymmetry and clinical features. Psychophysiology. 32:1995;373-381.
2. Cass, M. and Polich, J. P300 from a single-stimulus paradigm: auditory intensity and tone frequency effects. Biol. Psychol., 1997, in press.
3. Cohen, J. and Polich, J. On the number of trials needed for P300. Int. J. Psychophysiol., 1997, 25: 249-255.
4. Courchesne E. Changes in P300 waves with event repetition: long-term effects on scalp distribution and amplitude. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 45:1978;754-766.
5. Courchesne E., Hillyard S., Galambos R. Stimulus novelty, task relevance, and the visual evoked potential in man. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 39:1975;131-143.
6. Donchin E., Coles M.G.H. Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? Brain Behav. Sci. 11:1988;357-374.
7. Donchin, E., Kramer, A.F. and Wickens, C. Applications of brain event-related potentials to problems in engineering psychology. In: M.G.H. Coles, E. Donchin and S.W. Porges (Eds.), Psychophysiology: Systems, Processes, and Applications. Guilford Press, New York, 1986, pp. 702-718.
8. Emmerson R.Y., Dustman R.E., Shearer D.E., Turner C. P3 latency and symbol digit correlations in aging. Exp. Aging Res. 15:1990;151-159.
9. Fabiani M., Karis D., Donchin E. Effects of mnemonic strategy manipulation in a von Restorff paradigm. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 75:1990;22-35.
10. Ford J.M., Hillyard S.A. Event-related potentials (ERPs) to interruptions of a steady rhythm. Psychophysiology. 18:1981;322-330.
11. Ford J.M., Roth W.T., Kopell B.S. Auditory evoked potentials to unpredictable shifts in pitch. Psychophysiology. 13:1976;32-39.
12. Hirano C., Russell A., Ornitz Ed., Liu M. Habituation of P300 and reflex motor (startle blink) responses to repetitive startling stimuli in children. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 22:1996;97-109.
13. Humphrey D.G., Kramer A.F. Toward a psychophysiological assessment of dynamic changes in mental workload. Hum. Factors. 36:1994;3-26.
14. Johnson, R. The amplitude of the P300 component of the event-related potentials: review and synthesis. In: P. Ackles, J.R. Jennings and M.G.H. Coles (Eds.), Advances in Psychophysiology: A Research Annual, Vol. 3. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, 1988, pp. 69-137.
15. Johnson R. On the neural generators of the P300 component of the event-related potential. Psychophysiology. 30:1993;90-97.
16. Katayama J.-I., Polich J. P300 from one-, two-, and three-stimulus auditory paradigms. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 23:1996;33-40.
17. Knight R.T. Decreased response to novel stimuli after prefrontal lesions in man. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 59:1984;9-20.
18. Lammers W., Badia P. Habituation of P300 to target stimuli. Physiol. Behav. 45:1989;595-601.
19. McCarthy G., Wood C.C. Scalp distribution of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 62:1985;203-208.
20. McIsaac H., Polich J. Comparison of infant and adult P300 from auditory stimuli. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 53:1992;115-128.
21. Oades R.D., Zerbin D., Dittmann-Balcar A. The topography of event-related potentials in passive and active conditions of a 3-tone auditory oddball test. Int. J. Neurosci. 81:1995;249-264.
22. O'Donnell B.F., Friedman S., Squires N.K., Maloon A., Drachman D., Swearer J. Active and passive P300 latency in dementia. Neuropsychiat. Neuropsychol. Behav. Neurol. 3:1990;164-169.
23. O'Donnell B.F., Friedman S., Swearer J.M., Drachman D. Active and passive P3 latency and psychometric performance: influence of age and individual differences. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 12:1992;187-195.
24. Ornitz E.M., Russell A.T., Yuan H., Liu M. Autonomic, electroencephalographic, and myogenic activity accompanying startle and its habituation during mid-childhood. Psychophysiology. 33:1996;507-513.
25. Paller K.A., McCarthy G., Roessler E., Allison T., Wood C.C. Potentials evoked in human and monkey medial temporal lobe during auditory and visual oddball paradigms. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 84:1992;260-279.
26. Pfefferbaum A., Ford J., White P., Roth W.T. P300 in schizophrenia is affected by stimulus modality, response requirements, medication status and negative symptoms. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry. 46:1989;1035-1044.
27. Polich, J. Attention, probability, and task demands as determinants of P300 latency from auditory stimuli. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1986a, 63: 251-259.
28. Polich, J. P300 development from auditory stimuli. Psychophysiology, 1986b, 23: 590-597.
29. Polich, J. Comparison of P300 from a passive tone sequence paradigm and an active discrimination task. Psychophysiology, 1987a, 24: 41-46.
30. Polich, J. Response mode and P300 from auditory stimuli. Biol. Psychol., 1987b, 25: 61-71.
31. Polich J. Bifurcated P300 peaks: P3a and P3b revisited? J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 5:1988;287-294.
32. Polich, J. Habituation of P300 from auditory stimuli. Psychobiology, 1989a, 17: 19-28.
33. Polich, J. P300 from a passive auditory paradigm. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1989b, 74: 312-320.
34. Polich J. Meta-analysis of P300 normative aging studies. Psychophysiology. 33:1996;334-353.
35. Polich J., Heine M. P300 topography and modality effects from a single-stimulus paradigm. Psychophysiology. 33:1996;747-752.
36. Polich, J. and Margala, C. P300 from a single-stimulus paradigm: target probability effects. Int. J. Psychophysiol., 1997, 25: 169-176.
37. Polich J., Martin S. P300, cognitive capability, and personality: a correlational study of university undergraduates. Person. Ind. Diff. 13:1992;533-543.
38. Polich J., McIsaac H. Comparison of auditory P300 habituation from active and passive conditions. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 17:1994;25-34.
39. Polich J., Ehlers C.L., Otis S., Mandell A.J., Bloom F.E. P300 latency reflects the degree of cognitive decline in dementing illness. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 63:1986;138-144.
40. Polich J., Ladish C., Bloom F.E. P300 assessment of early Alzheimer's disease. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 77:1990;179-189.
41. Polich, J., Eischen, S.E. and Collins, G.E. P300 from a single auditory stimulus. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1994a, 92: 253-261.
42. Polich, J., Pollock, V.E. and Bloom, F.E. Meta-analysis of P300 amplitude from males at risk for alcoholism. Psychol. Bull., 1994b, 115: 55-73.
43. Ritter W., Vaughan H.G., Costa L.D. Orienting and habituation to auditory stimuli: a study of short term changes in averaged evoked responses. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 25:1968;550-556.
44. Ritter W., Simson R., Vaughan H.G. Association cortex potentials and reaction time in auditory discrimination. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 33:1972;547-555.
45. Romero R., Polich J. P300 habituation from auditory and visual stimuli. Physiol. Behav. 59:1996;517-522.
46. Roth W.T. Auditory evoked responses to unpredictable stimuli. Psychophysiology. 10:1973;125-138.
47. Roth W.T., Blowers G.H., Doyle C., Kopell B. Auditory stimulus intensity effects on components of the late positive complex. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 54:1982;132-146.
48. Roth W.T., Dorato K., Kopell B.S. Intensity and task effects on evoked physiological responses to noise bursts. Psychophysiology. 21:1984;466-481.
49. Sommer W., Matt J., Leuthold H. Consciousness of attention and expectancy as reflected in event-related potentials and reaction times. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cog. 16:1990;902-915.
50. Squires N.K., Squires K.C., Hillyard S. Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 38:1975;387-401.
51. Sugg M.J., Polich J. P300 from auditory stimuli: intensity and frequency effects. Biol. Psychol. 41:1995;255-269.
52. Wickens C., Kramer A., Vanesse L., Donchin E. The performance of concurrent tasks: a psychophysiological analysis of the reciprocity of information processing resources. Science. 221:1983;1080-1082.