Several levels of EGF receptor signaling during photoreceptor specification in wild-type, Ellipse, and null mutant Drosophila

Developmental Biology

Volumn 205, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 129-144

  Lesokhin, Alexander M ^a   Yu, Sung Yun ^a   Katz, Jordan ^a   Baker, Nicholas E ^a  

^a ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR; MITOGEN ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE; PROTEIN TYROSINE KINASE;

AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ARTICLE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; DROSOPHILA; ENZYME ACTIVATION; EYE DEVELOPMENT; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE MUTATION; NONHUMAN; PHOTORECEPTOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEPTOR INTRINSIC ACTIVITY; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

HEXAPODA;

EID: 0032894310     PISSN: 00121606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/dbio.1998.9121     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Aroian R. V., Koga M., Mendel J. E., Oshima Y., Sternberg D. W. Thelet-23Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 348:1990;693-699.
2. Baker N. E., Mlodzik M., Rubin G. M. Spacing differentiation in the developingDrosophilascabrous. Science. 250:1990;1370-1377.
3. Baker N. E., Rubin G. M. Effect on eye development of dominant mutations inDrosophila. Nature. 340:1989;150-153.
4. Baker N. E., Rubin G. M. EllipseDrosophila. Dev. Biol. 150:1992;381-396.
5. Baker N. E., Yu S. Proneural function of neurogenic genes in the developingDrosophila. Curr. Biol. 7:1997;122-132.
6. Baker N. E., Yu S., Han D. Evolution of proneural atonal expression during distinct regulatory phases in the developingDrosophila. Curr. Biol. 6:1996;1290-1301.
7. Baker N. E., Yu S. Y. The R8-photoreceptor equivalence group inDrosophila:DeltaNotch. Mech. Dev. 74:1998;3-14.
8. Baker N. E., Zitron A. E. DrosophilaNotchDeltascabrous. Mech. Dev. 49:1995;173-189.
9. Brand A. H., Perrimon N. Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development. 118:1993;401-415.
10. Brunner D., Oellers N., Szabad J., Biggs W. H. R., Zipursky S. L., Hafen E. A gain-of-function mutation inDrosophila. Cell. 76:1994;875-888.
11. Bunch T. A., Grinblat Y., Goldstein L. S. B. Characterization and use of theDrosophilaDrosophila melanogaster. Nucleic Acids Res. 16:1988;1043-1061.
12. Cagan R., Ready D. NotchDrosophila. Genes Dev. 3:1989;1099-1112.
13. Clifford R. J., Schupbach T. Coordinately and differentially mutable activities oftorpedo,Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 123:1989;771-787.
14. Clifford R. J., Schupbach T. Molecular analysis of theDrosophila. Genetics. 137:1994;531-550.
15. de Celis J. F., de Celis J., Ligoxygakis P., Preiss A., Delidakis C., Bray S. Functional relationships between Notch, Su(H) and the bHLH genes of the E(spl) complex: The E(spl) genes mediate only a subset of Notch activities during imaginal development. Development. 122:1996;2719-2728.
16. Diaz-Benjumea F. J., Hafen E. The sevenless signaling cassette mediatesDrosophila. Development. 120:1994;569-578.
17. Dokucu M. E., Zipursky S. L., Cagan R. L. Atonal, Rough and the resolution of proneural clusters in the developingDrosophila. Development. 122:1996;4139-4147.
18. Dominguez M., Wasserman J. D., Freeman M. Multiple functions of the EGF receptor inDrosophila. Curr. Biol. 8:1998;1039-1048.
19. Ellis M. C., Weber U., Wiersdorff V., Mlodzik M. Confrontation ofscabrousDrosophila. Development. 120:1994;1959-1969.
20. Fortini M. E., Rebay I., Caron L. A., Artavanis-Tsakonas S. An activated Notch receptor blocks cell-fate commitment in the developingDrosophila. Nature. 365:1993;555-557.
21. Freeman M. ThespitzDrosophila. Mech. Dev. 48:1994;25-33.
22. Freeman M. Reiterative use of the EGF receptor triggers differentiation of all cell types in theDrosophila. Cell. 87:1996;651-660.
23. Freeman M., Klambt C., Goodman C. S., Rubin G. M. TheargosDrosophila. Cell. 69:1992;963-975.
24. Golembo M., Schweitzer R., Freeman M., Shilo B. Z. Argos transcription is induced by theDrosophila. Development. 122:1996;223-230.
25. Grell E. New mutants report. Drosophila Inform. Service. 34:1960;50.
26. Hsu J. C., Perrimon N. A temperature-sensitive MEK mutation demonstrates the conservation of the signaling pathways activated by receptor tyrosine kinases. Genes Dev. 8:1994;2176-2187.
27. Hubbard S. R. Crystal structure of the activated insulin receptor tyrosine kinase in complex with peptide substrate and ATP analog. Eur. Mol. Biol. Organ. J. 16:1997;5572-5581.
28. Hubbard S. R., Wei L., Ellis L., Hendrickson W. A. Crystal structure of the tyrosine kinase domain of the human insulin receptor. Nature. 372:1994;746-754.
29. Jarman A. P., Grell E. H., Ackerman L., Jan L. Y., Jan Y. N. atonalDrosophila. Nature. 369:1994;398-400.
30. Jarman A. P., Sun Y., Jan L. Y., Jan Y. N. Role of the proneural gene,atonal,Drosophila. Development. 121:1995;2019-2030.
31. Katz W. S., Hill R. J., Clandinin T. R., Sternberg P. W. Different levels of theC. elegans. Cell. 82:1995;297-307.
32. Kauffman R. C., Li S., Gallagher P. A., Zhang J., Carthew R. W. Ras1 signaling and transcriptional competence in the R7 cell ofDrosophila. Genes Dev. 10:1996;2167-2178.
33. Kumar J. P., Tio M., Hsiung F., Akopyan S., Seger R., Shilo B.-Z., Moses K. Dissecting the roles of theDrosophila. Development. 125:1998;3875-3885.
34. Lee E., Baker N. E. GP300sca is not a high affinity ligand for Notch. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 225:1996;720-725.
35. Lee E.-C., Hu X., Yu S. Y., Baker N. E. ThescabrousDrosophila. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:1996;1179-1188.
36. Ligoxygakis P., Yu S.-Y., Delidakis C., Baker N. E. A subset of N functions duringDrosophila. Development. 125:1998;2893-2900.
37. Lindsley D. L., Zimm G. G. The Genome ofDrosophila melanogaster. 1992;Academic Press, New York.
38. Livneh E., Glazer L., Segal D., Schlessinger J., Shilo B. TheDrosophila. Cell. 40:1985;599-607.
39. Marchuk D., Drumm M., Saulino A., Collins F. S. Construction of T-vectors, a rapid and general system for direct cloning of unmodified PCR products. Nucleic Acids Res. 19:1991;1154.
40. Matsuo T., Takahashi K., Kondo S., Kaibuchi K., Yamamoto D. Regulation of cone cell formation by Canoe and ras in the developingDrosophila. Development. 124:1997;2671-2680.
41. Mohammadi M., Schlessinger J., Hubbard S. R. Structure of the FGF receptor tyrosine kinase domain reveals a novel autoinhibitory mechanism. Cell. 86:1996;577-587.
42. O'Neill E. M., Rebay I., Tjian R., Rubin G. M. The activities of two Ets-related transcription factors required forDrosophila. Cell. 78:1994;137-147.
43. Price J. V., Savenye E. D., Lum D., Breitkreutz A. Dominant enhancers of Egfr inDrosophila melanogaster: Genetics. 147:1997;1139-1153.
44. Queenan A. M., Ghabrial A., Schupbach T. Ectopic activation of torpedo/Egfr, aDrosophila. Development. 124:1997;3871-3880.
45. Raz E., Schejter E. D., Shilo B. Z. Interallelic complementation among DER/flb. Genetics. 129:1991;191-201.
46. Rebay I., Rubin G. M. Yan functions as a general inhibitor of differentiation and is negatively regulated by activation of the Ras/MAPK pathway. Cell. 81:1995;857-866.
47. Reichman-Fried M., Dickson B., Hafen E., Shilo B.-Z. Elucidation of the role ofbreathless,Drosophila. Genes Dev. 8:1994;428-439.
48. Rutledge B. J., Zhang K., Bier E., Jan Y. N., Perrimon N. TheDrosophila spitz. Genes Dev. 6:1992;1503-1517.
49. Sawamoto K., Okabe M., Tanimura T., Mikoshiba K., Nishiba Y., Okano H. TheDrosophila. Dev. Biol. 178:1996;13-22.
50. Schnepp B., Grumbling G., Donaldson T., Simcox A. Vein is a novel component in theDrosophila. Genes Dev. 10:1996;2302-2313.
51. Schweitzer R., Howes R., Smith R., Shilo B. Z., Freeman M. Inhibition ofDrosophila. Nature. 376:1995a;699-702.
52. Schweitzer R., Shaharabany M., Seger R., Shilo B.-Z. Secreted Spitz triggers the DER signaling pathway and is a limiting component in embryonic ectoderm determination. Genes Dev. 9:1995b;1518-1529.
53. Simon M. A., Bowtell D. D. L., Dodson G. S., Laverty T. R., Rubin G. M. Ras1 and a putative guanine nucleotide exchange factor perform crucial steps in signaling by the sevenless protein tyrosine kinase. Cell. 67:1991;701-716.
54. Spencer S. A., Powell P. A., Miller D. T., Cagan R. L. Regulation of EGF receptor signalling establishes pattern across the developingDrosophila. Development. 125:1998;4777-4790.
55. Stemerdink C., Jacobs J. R. Argos and Spitz group genes function to regulate midline glial cell number inDrosophila. Development. 124:1997;3787-3796.
56. Sternberg P. W., Horvitz H. R. The combined action of two intercellular signaling pathways specifies three cell fates during vulval induction inC. elegans. Cell. 58:1989;679-693.
57. Sun X., Artavanis-Tsakonas S. The intracellular deletions of DELTA and SERRATE define dominant negative forms of theDrosophila. Development. 122:1996;2465-2474.
58. Tio M., Ma C., Moses K. spitz,Drosophila. Mech. Dev. 48:1994;13-23.
59. Tio M., Moses K. TheDrosophila. Development. 124:1997;343-351.
60. Vincent J., Girdham C., O'Farrell P. A cell-autonomous, ubiquitous marker for the analysis ofDrosophila. Dev. Biol. 164:1994;328-331.
61. Xu T., Rubin G. M. Analysis of genetic mosaics in the developing and adultDrosophila. Development. 117:1993;1223-1236.
62. Zak N. B., Shilo B. Z. Localization of DER and the pattern of cell divisions in wild-type andEllipse. Dev. Biol. 149:1992;448-456.