Responsiveness of the rehabilitation activities profile and the Barthel Index

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Volumn 49, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 39-44

  Van Bennekom, Coen A M ^a   Jelles, Frank ^a   Lankhorst, Gustaaf J ^a   Bouter, Lex M ^b  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Functional assessment; Rehabilitation; Responsiveness

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HOME; HOSPITAL; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NETHERLANDS; NURSING HOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REHABILITATION MEDICINE; STATISTICS; STROKE; TECHNIQUE; TIME;

EID: 0029944433     PISSN: 08954356     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(95)00559-5     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Wade DT. Measurement in Neurological Rehabilitation. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992.
2. Kirshner B, Guyatt G. A methodological framework for assessing health indices. J Chron Dis 1985; 38: 27-36.
3. Deyo RA, Centor RM. Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance. J Chron Dis 1986; 39:897-906.
4. Guyatt G, Walter S, Norman G. Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chron Dis 1987; 40: 171-178.
5. Bennekom CAM van, Jelles F, Lankhorst GJ. Rehabilitation Activities Profile, the ICIDH as a framework for a problem-oriented assessment method in rehabilitation medicine. Disabil Rehabil 1995; 17: 169-175.
6. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. MD State Med J 1965; 14: 61-65.
7. Jelles F, Bennekom CAM van, Lankhorst GJ, Sibbel TCJP, Bouter LM. Inter- and intra-rater agreement of the Rehabilitation Activities Profile. J Clin Epidemiol 1995; 48: 407-416.
8. Granger CV, Dewis LS, Peters NC, Sherwood CC, Barrett JE. Stroke rehabilitation: analysis of repeated Barthel Index measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1979; 60:14-17.
9. Wade DT, Collin C. The Barthel Index: a standard measure of physical disability? Int Disabil Stud 1988; 10: 64-67.
10. Collin C, Wade DT, Davies S. Home V. The Barthel Index: a reliability study. Int Disabil Stud 1988; 10: 61-63.
11. Chino N. Efficacy of Barthel Index in evaluating activities of daily living in Japan, the United States, and United Kingdom. Stroke 1990; 21(suppl II): 64-65.
12. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behaviorial Sciences. New York: Academic Press; 1977; 1-27.
13. Liang MH, Fossel AH, Larson MG. Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation. Med Care 1990; 28:632-642.
14. Kazis LE, Anderson JJ, Meenan RF. Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care 1989; 27: S178-S189.
15. Guyatt GH, Eagle DJ, Sackett B, Willan A, Griffith L, McIlroy W, Patterson CJ, Turpie I. Measuring quality of life in the frail elderly. J Clin Epidemiol 1993; 46: 1433-1444.
16. Guyatt GH, Deyo RA, Charlson M, Levine MN, Mitchell A. Responsiveness and validity in health status measurement: a clarification. J Clin Epidemiol 1989; 42: 403-408.
17. Liang MH, Larson MG, Cullen KE, Schwartz JA. Comparative measurement efficiency and sensitivity of five health status instruments for arthritis research. Arthritis Rheum 1985; 28: 542-547.
18. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982; 143: 29-36.
19. Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol 1989; 42: 703-709.
20. Deyo RA, Diehr P, Patrick DL. Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures: statistics and strategies for evaluation. Control Clin Trials 1991; 12: 142S-158S.
21. Katz JN, Larson MG, Phillips CB, Fossel AH, Liang MH. Comparative measurement sensitivity of short and longer health status instruments. Med Care 1992; 30: 917-925.
22. Fitzpatrick R, Ziebland S, Jenkinson C, Mowat A, Mowat A. Importance of sensitivity to change as a criterion for selecting health status measures. Quality in Health Care 1992; 1: 89-93.
23. MacKenzie CR, Charlson ME, DiGioia D, Kelley K. Can the Sickness Impact Profile measure change? An example of scale assessment. J Chron Dis 1986; 39: 429-438.