Nucleosomes and transcription: Recent lessons from genetics

Current Opinion in Genetics and Development

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 192-198

  Hartzog, Grant A ^a   Winston, Fred ^a  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HISTONE; HISTONE ACETYLTRANSFERASE; HISTONE DEACETYLASE; PROTEIN; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR;

ACETYLATION; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; DROSOPHILA; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOSOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 0030926922     PISSN: 0959437X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-437X(97)80128-1     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Svaren J, Hörz W: Regulation of gene expression by nucleosomes. Curr Opin Genet Dev 1996, 6:164-170.
2. Grunstein M, Hecht A, Fisher-Adams G, Wan J, Mann RK, Strahl-Bolsinger S, Laroche T, Gasser S: The regulation of euchromatin and heterochromatin by histones in yeast. J Cell Sci 1995, 19(suppl):29-36.
3. Paranjape SM, Kamakaka RT, Kadonaga JT: Role of chromatin structure in the regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase II. Annu Rev Biochem 1994, 63:265-297.
4. Kingston RE, Bunker CA, Imbalzano AN: Repression and activation by multiprotein complexes that alter chromatin structure. Genes Dev 1996, 10:905-920.
5. Hirschhorn JN, Brown SA, Clark CD, Winston F: Evidence that SNF2/SWI2 and SNF5 activate transcription in yeast by altering chromatin structure. Genes Dev 1992, 6:2288-2298.
6. Prelich G, Winston F: Mutations that suppress the deletion of an upstream activating sequence in yeast: involvement of a protein kinase and histone H3 in repressing transcription in vivo. Genetics 1993, 135:665-676.
7. Kruger W, Peterson CL, Sil A, Coburn C, Arents G, Moudrianakis EN, Herskowitz I: Amino acid substitutions in the structured domains of histones H3 and H4 partially relieve the requirement of the yeast SWI/SNF complex for transcription. Genes Dev 1995, 9:2770-2779. The authors of this paper describe mutations in H3 and H4 genes that suppress snt/swi mutations. Potential molecular defects caused by these mutations are inferred by observing the position of the altered amino acids on the crystal structure of the nucleosome.
8. Hirschhorn JN, Bortvin AL, Ricupero-Hovasse SL, Winston F: A new class of histone H2A mutants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae causes specific transcriptional defects in vitro. Mol Cell Biol 1995, 15:1999-2009. H2A mutants were identified as candidates that block Snf/Swi activity. The analysis of chromatin structure in these mutants, however, suggests that the histone mutants are impairing a step subsequent to Snf/Swi action.
9. Chen H, Li B, Workman JL: A histone-binding protein, nucleoplasmin, stimulates transcription factor binding to nucleosomes and factor-induced nucleosome disassembly. EMBO J 1994, 13:380-390.
10. Côté J, Quinn J, Workman JL, Peterson CL: Stimulation of GAL4 derivative binding to nucleosomal DNA by the yeast SNF/SWI complex. Science 1994, 265:53-60.
11. Owen-Hughes T, Utley RT, Côté J, Peterson CL, Workman JL: Persistent site-specific remodeling of a nucleosome array by transient action of the SWI/SNF complex. Science 1996, 273:513-516.
12. Recht J, Dunn B, Raff A, Osley MA: Functional analysis of histones H2A and H2B in transcriptional repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 1996, 16:2545-2553.
13. Schuster T, Han M, Grunstein M: Yeast histone H2A and H2B amino termini have interchangeable functions. Cell 1986, 45:445-451.
14. Ling Y, Harkness TA, Schultz MC. Fisher-Adams G, Grunstein M: Yeast histone H3 and H4 amino termini are important for nucleosome assembly in vivo and in vitro: redundant and position-independent functions in assembly but not in gene regulation. Genes Dev 1996, 10:686-699. This paper shows that the amino termini of H3 and H4 provide a redundant function that requires at least one member of the histone pair to have an intact amino terminus. The tails are required for efficient nucleosome assembly in vitro and normal chromatin structure in vivo.
15. Lenfant F, Mann RK, Thomsen B, Ling X, Grunstein M: All four core histone N-termini contain sequences required for the repression of basal transcription in yeast. EMBO J 1996, 15:3974-3685.
16. Wan JS, Mann RK, Grunstein M: Yeast histone H3 and H4 N-termini function through different GAL1 regulatory elements to repress and activate transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995, 92:5664-5668. Previously, deletion of the H3 or H4 amino terminus was shown to have specific effects on GAL1 transcription. This paper maps the elements of the GAL1 promoter that are necessary for response to the altered histones. The effect of the H3 amino-terminal deletion is mediated by the GAL1 UAS and the effect of the H4 amino-terminal deletion is mediated by a 278 nucleotide region over the GAL1 TATA region.
17. Fisher-Adams G, Grunstein M: Yeast histone H4 and H3 N-termini have different effects on the chromatin structure of the GAL1 promoter. EMBO J 1995, 14:1458-1477. This paper shows that in H4 amino-terminal deletion strains, a nucleosome is repositioned nearer to the GAL1 TATA box. The results provide a model for the functional interaction of the H4 amino terminus and GAL1 TATA region described in [16*].
18. Selleck SB, Majors J: In vivo 'photofootprint' changes at sequences between the GAL1 upstream activating sequence and 'TATA' element require activated GAL4 protein but not a functional TATA element. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1988, 85:5399-5403.
19. Fedor MJ, Kornberg RD: Upstream activation sequence-dependent alteration of chromatin structure and transcription activation of the yeast GAL1-GAL10 genes. Mol Cell Biol 1989, 9:1721-1732.
20. Turner BM, O'Neill LP: Histone acetylation in chromatin and chromosomes. Semin Cell Biol 1995, 6:229-236.
21. Brownell JE, Allis CD: Special HATs for special occasions: linking histone acetylation to chromatin assembly and gene activation. Curr Opin Genet Dev 1996, 6:176-184.
22. Lee DY, Hayes JJ, Pruss D, Wolffe AP: A positive role for histone acetylation in transcription factor access to nucleosomal DNA. Cell 1993, 72:73-84.
23. Brownell JE, Zhou J, Ranalli T, Kobayashi R, Edmondson DG, Roth SY, Allis CD: Tetrahymena histone acetyltransferase A: a homolog to yeast Gcn5p linking histone acetylation to gene activation. Cell 1996, 84:843-851. The gene encoding a catalytic subunit of a Tetrahymena nuclear histone acetylase was cloned and was found to be a homolog of the yeast transcriptional regulator Gcn5. This paper describes both the first cloned acetylase of the important amino-terminal lysines of histories and an important functional link between histone acetylatian and the regulation ot transcription.
24. Georgakopoulos T, Thieros G: Two distinct yeast transcriptional activators require the function of the GCN5 protein to promote normal levels of transcription. EMBO J 1992, 11:4145-4152.
25. Candau R, Moore PA, Wang L, Barlev N, Ying CY, Rosen CA, Berger SL: Identification of human proteins functionally conserved with the yeast putative adaptors ADA2 and GCN5. Mol Cell Biol 1996, 16:593-602.
26. Yang X-J, Ogryzko VV, Nishikawa J-I, Howard BH, Nakatani Y: A p300/CBP-associated factor that competes with the adenoviral oncoprotein E1A. Nature 1996, 382:319-324. This paper shows that a factor which associates with the transcriptional co-activator p300/CBP is P/CAF, a human homolog of the histone acetylase GCN5. P/CAF binds to the same site on p300/CBP as adenovirus E1A protein, a negative regulator of p300/CBP.
27. Ogryzko V, Schiltz RL, Russanova V, Howard BH, Nakatani Y: The transcriptional coactivators p300 and CBP are histone acetyltransferases. Cell 1996, 87:953-959. Surprisingly, p300/CBP, in addition to its association with the Hat P/CAF, has a Hat activity of its own. The association of p300/CBP with sequence-specific DMA-binding proteins suggests a mechanism for targeted histone acetylation.
28. II250 subunit of TFIID has histone acetyltransferase activity. Cell 1996, 87:1261-1270. The largest subunit of TFIID can acetylate nucleosomal histones. This suggests a mechanism whereby histones at promoters can be targeted specifically for acetylation.
29. Kuo M-H, Brownell JE, Sobel RE, Ranalli TA, Cook RG, Edmondson DG, Roth SY, Allis CD: Transcription-linked acetylation by Gcn5p of histones H3 and H4 at specific lysines. Nature 1996, 383:269-272.
30. Reifsnyder C, Lowell J, Clarke A, Pillus L: Yeast SAS silencing genes and human genes associated with AML and HIV-1 Tat interactions are homologous with acetyltransferases. Nat Genet 1996, 14:42-49.
31. Kleff S, Andrulis ED, Anderson CW, Sternglanz R: Identification of a gene encoding a yeast histone H4 acetyltransferase. J Biol Chem 1995, 270:24674-24677. The authors describe the first identification of a histone acetylase gene.
32. Parthun MR, Johnathon W, Gottschling DE: The major cytoplasmic histone acetyltransferase in yeast: links to chromatin replication and histone metabolism. Cell 1996, 87:85-94. A description of the purification and cloning of a major cytoplasmic histone acetylase of yeast, Hat1/Hat2. Hat2 is a homolog of a previously identified human protein, Rbap4B, that is found in other protein complexes which associate with acetylated histones [33,34*,35,36*].
33. Qian YW, Wang YC, Hollingsworth RE, Jones D, Ling N, Lee EY: A retinoblastome-binding protein related to a negative regulator fo Ras in yeast. Nature 1993, 354:648-652.
34. Verreault A, Kaufman PD, Kobayashi R, Stillman B: Nucleosome assembly by a complex of CAF-1 and acetylated histones H3/H4. Cell 1996, 87:95-104. CAF-1 assembles nucleosomes in vitro in a replication-dependent manner. This paper shows that the small subunit of CAF-1 is identical to Rbap48, a human homolog of Hat2 [32**]. Additionally, Rbap48 can bind to histone H4 in the absence of other subunits of CAF-1.
35. Tyler JK, Bulger M, Kamakaka RT, Kobayashi R, Kadonaga JT: The p55 subunit of Drosophila chromatin assembly factor 1 is homologous to a histone deacetylase-associated protein. Mol Cell Biol 1996, 16:6149-6159.
36. Taunton J, Hassig CA, Schreiber SL: A mammalian histone deacetylase related to the yeast transcriptional regulator Rpd3p. Science 1996, 272:409-411. Using an inhibitor of histone deacetylases, trapoxin, to make an affinity matrix, the first histone deacetylase was purified and its gene was cloned. This deacetylase is a heteromeric complex of Rbap48 and a catalytic subunit, HD1, that is similar to the yeast transcriptional regulator, and deacetylase [38**] Rpd3.
37. Carmen AA, Rundlett SE, Grunstein M: HDA1 and HDA3 are components of a yeast histone deacetylase (HDA) complex. J Biol Chem 1996, 271:15837-15844.
38. Rundlett SE, Carmen AA, Kobayashi R, Bavykir S, Turner BM, Grunstein M: HDA1 and RPD3 are members of distinct yeast histone deacetylase complexes that regulate silencing and transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996, 93:14503-14508. Rpd3 and a homolog, Hda1, are subunits of the yeast deacetylases HDB and HDA. Both rpd3 and hda1 mutations affect transcription. Clear evidence for the existence of other deacetylases in yeast is presented.
39. Braunstein M, Rose AB, Holmes SG, Allis CD, Broach JR: Transcriptional silencing in yeast is associated with reduced nucleosome acetylation. Genes Dev 1993, 7:592-604.
40. Roth SY: Chromatin mediated transcriptional repression in yeast. Curr Opin Genet Dev 1995, 5:168-173.
41. Edmondson DG, Smith MM, Roth SY: Repression domain of the yeast global repressor Tup1 interacts directly with histones H3 and H4. Genes Dev 1996, 10:1247-1259. Tup1, a repressor of transcription and the amino terminus of histone H4 were previously shown to be neccessary for the organized chromatin structure that accompanies transcriptional repression of a Tup1-repressed promoter. This paper shows that Tup1 can physically associate with hypoacetlyated forms of histones H3 and H4. This interaction correlates with the ability of Tup1 to repress transcription and depends upon the repression domain of Tup1 and the amino termini of H3 and H4.
42. Hecht A, Larouche T, Strahl-Bolsinger S, Gasser SM, Grunstein M: Histone H3 and H4 N-termini interact with SIR3 and SIR4 proteins: a molecular model for the formation of heterochromatin in yeast. Cell 1995, 80:583-592.
43. Hecht A, Strahl-Bolsinger S, Grunstein M: Spreading of transcriptional repressor SIR3 from telomeric heterochromatin. Nature 1996, 383:92-96. In this paper, Sir3 is shown to associate with HM loci and telomeres through the use of an immunoprecipitation assay to monitor their association in vivo. This method is of general use for any possible protein-DNA interaction. When Sir3 is overexpressed, the region of telomeric transcriptional silencing is expanded and correlates with the extent of Sir3 association with telomeric sequences.
44. Strahl-Bolsinger S, Hecht A, Luo K, Grunstein M: Sir2 and Sir4 interactions differ in core and extended telomeric heterochromatin in yeast. Genes Dev 1997, 11:83-93. By using the crosslinking-immunoprecipitation assay described in [43**], the association of Sir4, Sir2 and Rap1 with telomeric DNA is monitored. This data, plus the known interactions between Rap1, the Sir proteins and histones H3 and H4 is used to build a detailed model of telomeric heterochromatin. The methodologies used in this paper and [43**] to deduce the structure of telomeric heterochromatin in vivo provide powerful tools for the investigation of chromatin structure at any locus of interest.
45. Swanson MS, Winston F: SPT4, SPT5 and SPT6 interactions: effects on transcription and viability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 1992, 132:325-336.
46. Bortvin AL, Wintston F: Evidence that Spt6p controls chromatin structure by a direct interaction with histones. Science 1996, 272:1473-1476. The authors of this paper demonstrate that Spt6, previously hypothesized to control chromatin structure, interacts with histones in vitro - primarily H3 and H4. Additionally, Spt6 will assemble nucleosomes in vitro. In vivo, an spt6 mutation is shown to suppress a snf/swi mutation and to be suppressed by overexpression of H3.
47. Hubbard EJ, Dong Q, Greenwald I: Evidence for physical and functional association between EMB-5 and LIN-12 in Caenorhabditis elegans. Science 1996, 273:112-115.
48. Alevizopoulos A, Dusserre Y, Tsai-Pflugfelder M, Von der Weid T, Wahli W, Mermod N: A proline-rich TGF-β-responsive transcriptional activator interacts with histone H3. Genes Dev 1995, 9:3051-3066. CTF-1 is a mammalian transcription factor the activity of which is regulated by TGF-β. CTF can interact with histone H3 in vitro and in vivo and the ability of CTF-1 mutants to respond to TGF-β correlates with the ability of the altered CTF-1 to interact with histone H3. CTF-1, unlike Tup1 and Sir3 and Sir4, interacts with H3 independently of its amino terminus.
49. Shen X, Yu L, Weir JW, Gorovsky MA: Linker histones are not essential and affect chromatin condensation in vivo. Cell 1995, 82:47-56. The histone H1 genes specific to the Tetrahymena micro- or macronuclei were deleted. These mutations did not affect viability or growth rate, although they did result in increased nuclear volumes. These surprising results lead to the conclusion that, at least in Tetrahymena, complete loss of histone H1 has little effect on growth or gene expression.
50. Shen X, Gorovsky MA: Linker histone HI regulates specific gene expression but not global transcription in vivo. Cell 1996, 88:475-483. Transcription by RNA polymerases I and III appears to be unaffected by loss of histone H1 in Tetrahymena. Bulk RNA polymerase II transcription also appears to be unaffected by loss of H1 but levels of individual transcripts may increase or decrease.
51. Sirotkin AM, Edelmann W, Cheng G, Klein-Szanto A, Kucherlapati R, Skoultchi Al: Mice develop normally without the H1° linker histone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995, 92:6434-6438.
52. Landsman D: Histone H1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a double mystery solved? Trends Biochem Sci 1996, 21:287-288.
53. Brachmann CB, Sherman JM, Devine SE, Cameron EE, Pillus L, Boeke J: The SIR2 gene family, conserved from bacteria to humans, functions in silencing, cell cycle progression, and chromosome stability, Genes Dev 1995, 9:2888-2902.
54. Basrai MA, Kingsbury J, Koshland D, Spencer F, Hieter P: Faithful chromosome transmission requires Spt4p, a putative regulator of chromatin structure in Saccharomyces cereivsiae. Mol Cell Biol 1986, 16:2833-2847.
55. Stoler S, Keith KC, Curnick KE, Fitzgerald-Hayes M: A mutation in CSE4, an essential gene encoding a novel chromatin-associated protein in yeast, causes chromosome non-disjunction and cell cycle arrest at mitosis. Genes Dev 1995, 9:573-586.
56. Smith MM, Yang P, Santisteban MS, Boone PW, Goldstein AT, Megee PC: A novel histone H4 mutant defective in nuclear division and mitotic chromosome transmission. Mol Cell Biol 1996, 16:1017-1026.
57. Megee PC, Morgan BA, Smith MM: Histone H4 and maintenance of genome integrity. Genes Dev 1995, 9:1716-1727.
58. Malagón F, Andrés A: Differential intrachromosomal hyperrecombination phenotype of spt4 and spt6 mutants of S. cerevisiae. Curr Genet 1996, 30:101-106.
59. De Rubertis, Kadosh D, Henchov S, Pauli D, Reuter G, Struhl K, Spierer P: The histone deacetylase RPD3 counteracts genomic silencing in Drosophila and yeast. Nature 1996, 384:589-591.
60. Bannister AJ, Kouzarides T: The CBP co-activator is a histone acetyltransferase. Nature 1996, 384:641-643.