Repression domain of the yeast global repressor Tup1 interacts directly with histones H3 and H4

Genes and Development

Volumn 10, Issue 10, 1996, Pages 1247-1259

  Edmondson, Diane G ^a   Smith, M Mitchell ^b   Roth, Sharon Y ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

chromatin; histones; repression; Ssn6 Tup1; transcription

Indexed keywords

DNA; HISTONE H3; HISTONE H4; REPRESSOR PROTEIN;

ACETYLATION; AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CHROMATIN STRUCTURE; DNA DAMAGE; GENE MUTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN INTERACTION; REPRESSOR GENE; YEAST;

EID: 0030003051     PISSN: 08909369     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/gad.10.10.1247     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Allis, C.D. and J.C. Wiggins. 1984. Histone rearrangements accompany nuclear differentiation and dedifferentiation in Tetrahymena. Dev. Biol. 101: 282-294.
2. Allis, C.D., C.V. Glover, J.K. Bowen, and M.A. Gorovsky. 1980. Histone variants specific to the transcriptionally active, amitotically dividing macronucleus of the unicellular eucaryote, Tetrahymena thermophila. Cell 20: 609-617.
3. Bienz, M. 1992. Molecular mechanism of determination in Drosophila. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 4: 955-961.
4. Bohm, L., G. Briand, P. Sauthere, and C. Crane-Robinson. 1981. Proteolytic digestion studies of chromatin core-histone structure. Identification of the limit peptides of histories H3 and H4. Eur. J. Biochem. 119: 67-74.
5. Bone, J.R., J. Lavender, R. Richman, M.J. Palmer, B.M. Turner, and M.I. Kuroda. 1994. Acetylated histone H4 on the male X chromosome is associated with dosage compensation in Drosophila. Genes & Dev. 8: 96-104.
6. Bortvin, A. and F. Winston. 1996. Evidence that Spt6p controls chromatin structure by a direct interaction with histones. Science (in press).
7. Braunstein, M., A.B. Rose, S.G. Holmes, C.D. Allis, and J.R. Broach. 1993. Transcriptional silencing in yeast is associated with reduced nucleosome acetylation. Genes & Dev. 7: 592-604.
8. Carlson, M., B.C. Osmond, L. Neigeborn, and D. Botstein. 1984. A suppressor of snf1 mutations causes constitutive high-level invertase synthesis in yeast. Genetics 107: 19-32.
9. Cooper, J.P., S.Y. Roth, and R.T. Simpson. 1994. The global transcriptional regulators, SSN6 and TUP1, play distinct roles in the establishment of a repressive chromatin structure. Genes & Dev. 8: 1400-1410.
10. Davie, J.R., C.A. Saunders, J.M. Walsh, and S.C. Weber. 1981. Histone modifications in the yeast S. cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. 9: 3205-3216.
11. Elledge, S.J. and R.W. Davis. 1989. DNA damage induction of ribonucleotide reductase. Mol. Cell. Biol. 9: 4932-4940.
12. Fisher-Adams, G. and M. Grunstein. 1995. Yeast histone H4 and H3 N-termini have different effects on the chromatin structure of the GAL1 promoter. EMBO J. 14: 1468-1477.
13. Fong, H.K.W., J.B. Hurley, R.S. Hopkins, R. Miake-Lye, M.S. Johnson, R.F. Doolittle, and M. Simon. 1986. Repetitive segmental structure of the transducin β subunit: Homology with the CDC4 gene and identification of related mRNAs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 83: 2162-2166.
14. Harlow, E. and D. Lane. 1988. Antibodies: A laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
15. Hecht, A., T. Laroche, S. Strahl-Bolsinger, S.M. Gasser, and M. Grunstein. 1995. Histone H3 and H4 N-termini interact with Sir3 and Sir4 proteins: A molecular model for the formation of heterochromatin in yeast. Cell 80: 583-592.
16. Herschbach, B.M., M.B. Arnaud, and A.D. Johnson. 1994. Transcriptional repression directed by the yeast α2 protein in vitro. Nature 370: 309-311.
17. Hill, J., I.G. Donald, and D.E. Griffiths. 1991. DMSO enhanced yeast transformation. Nucleic Acids Res. 19: 5791.
18. Hirschhorn, J.N., S.A. Brown, C.D. Clark, and F. Winston. 1992. Evidence that SNF2/SWI2 and SNF5 activate transcription in yeast by altering chromatin structure. Genes & Dev. 6: 2288-2298.
19. Jeppesen, P. and B.M. Turner. 1993. The inactive X chromosome in female mammals is distinguished by a lack of histone H4 acetylation, a cytogenetic marker for gene expression. Cell 74: 281-289.
20. Johnson, L.M., P.S. Kayne, E.S. Kahn, and M. Grunstein. 1990. Genetic evidence for an interaction between SIR3 and histone H4 in the repression of silent mating loci in Sacchammyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 87: 6286-6290.
21. Kayne, P.S., U. Kim, M. Han, J.R. Mullen, F. Yoshizaki, and M. Grunstein. 1988. Extremely conserved histone H4 N terminus is dispensable for growth but essential for repressing the silent mating loci in yeast. Cell 55: 27-39.
22. Keleher, C.A., M.J. Redd, J. Schultz, M. Carlson, and A.D. Johnson. 1992. SSN6-TUP1 is a general repressor of transcription in yeast. Cell 68: 709-719.
23. Kleinschmidt, J.A. and A. Seiter. 1988. Identification of domains involved in nuclear uptake and histone binding of protein N1 of Xenopus laevis. EMBO J. 7: 1605-1614.
24. Komachi, K., M.J. Redd, and A.D. Johnson. 1994. The WD repeats of TUP1 interact with the homeo domain protein α2. Genes & Dev. 8: 2857-2867.
25. Kuchin, S., P. Yeghiayan, and M. Carlson. 1995. Cyclin-dependent protein kinase and cyclin homologs SSN3 and SSN8 contribute to transcriptional control in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 92: 4006-4010.
26. Lewin, B. 1994. Chromatin and gene expression: Constant questions but changing answers. Cell 79: 397-406.
27. Lin, R., J.W. Leone, R.G. Cook, and C.D. Allis. 1989. Antibodies specific to acetylated histones document the existence of deposition- and transcription-related histone acetylation in Tetrahymena. J. Cell Biol. 108: 1577-1588.
28. Mann, R.K. and M. Grunstein. 1992. Histone H3 N-terminal mutations allow hyperactivation of the yeast GAL1 gene in vivo. EMBO J. 11: 3297-3306.
29. Matallana, E., L. Franco, and J.E. Perez-Ortin. 1992. Chromatin structure of the yeast SUC2 promoter in regulatory mutants. Mol. & Gen. Genet. 231: 395-400.
30. Megee, P.C., B.A. Morgan, and M.M. Smith. 1995. Histone H4 and the maintenance of genome integrity. Genes & Dev. 9: 1716-1727.
31. Morgan, B.A, B.A. Mittman, and M.M. Smith. 1991. The highly conserved N-terminal domains of histones H3 and H4 are required for normal cell cycle progression. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11: 4111-4120.
32. Mukai, Y., S. Harashima, and Y. Oshima. 1991. AAR1/TUP1 protein, with a structure similar to that of the β subunit of G proteins, is required for a1-α2 and α2 repression in cell type control of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11: 3773-3779.
33. Orlando, V. and R. Paro. 1995. Chromatin multiprotein complexes involved in the maintenance of transcription patterns. Curr. Opin. Gen. Dev. 5: 174-179.
34. Rose, M.D., F. Winston, and P. Hieter. 1990. Methods in yeast genetics: A laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
35. Roth, S.Y. 1995. Chromatin-mediated transcriptonal repression in yeast. Curr. Opin. Gen. Dev. 5: 168-173.
36. Roth, S.Y. and R.T. Simpson. 1992. Yeast minichromosomes. Methods Cell Biol. 35: 289-314.
37. Roth, S.Y., A. Dean, and R.T. Simpson. 1990. Yeast α2 repressor positions nucleosomes in TRP1/ARS1 chromatin. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10: 2247-2260.
38. Roth, S.Y., M. Shimizu, L. Johnson, M. Grunstein, and R.T. Simpson. 1992. Stable nucleosome positioning and complete repression by the yeast α2 repressor are disrupted by amino-terminal mutations in histone H4. Genes & Dev. 6: 411-425.
39. Sambrook, J., E.F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: A laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
40. Sathe, S.S. and P.J. Harte. 1995. The Drosophila extra sex combs protein contains WD motifs essential for its function as a repressor of homeotic genes. Mech. Dev. (in press).
41. Schultz, J. and M. Carlson. 1987. Molecular analysis of SSN6, a gene functionally related to SNF1 kinase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 7: 3637-3645.
42. Schultz, J., L. Marshall-Carlson, and M. Carlson. 1990. The N terminal TPR region is the functional domain of SSN6, a nuclear phosphoprotein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10: 4744-4756.
43. Shimizu, M., S.Y. Roth, C. Szent-Gyorgyi, and R.T. Simpson. 1991. Nucleosomes are positioned with base pair precision adjacent to the α2 operator in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 10: 3033-3041.
44. Simpson, R.T., S.Y. Roth, R.H. Morse, H.G. Patterton, J.P. Cooper, M. Murphy, M.P. Kladde, and M. Shimizu. 1993. Nucleosome positioning and transcription. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 58: 237-245.
45. Smith, R.L., M.J. Redd, and A.D. Johnson. 1995. The tetratricopeptide repeats of Ssn6 interact with the homeo domain of α2. Genes & Dev. 9: 2903-2910.
46. Thompson, J.S., X. Ling, and M. Grunstein. 1994. Histone H3 amino terminus is required for telomeric and silent mating locus repression in yeast. Nature 369: 245-247.
47. Treitel, M.A. and M. Carlson. 1995. Repression by Ssn6-Tup1 is directed by MIG1, a repressor /activator protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 92: 3132-3136.
48. Trumbly, R.J. 1986. Isolation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants constitutive for invertase synthesis. J. Bacteriol. 166: 1123-1127.
49. Turner, B.M. 1991. Histone acetylation and control of gene expression. J. Cell Sci. 99: 13-20.
50. Turner, B.M., L. Franchi, and H. Wallace. 1990. Islands of acetylated histone in polytene chromosomes and their relationship to chromatin packaging and transcriptional activity. J. Cell Sci. 96: 335-346.
51. Turner, B.M., A.J. Birley, and J. Lavender. 1992. Histone H4 isoforms acetylated at specific lysine residues define individual chromosomes and chromatin domains in Drosophila polytene nuclei. Cell 69: 375-384.
52. Tzamarias, D. and K. Struhl. 1994. Functional dissection of the yeast Cyc8-Tup1 transcriptional co-repressor complex. Nature 369: 758-761.
53. _. 1995. Distinct TPR motifs of cyc8 are involved in recruiting the Cyc8-Tup1 corepressor complex to differentially regulated promoters. Genes & Dev. 9: 821-831.
54. Van der Lugt, N.M.T., J. Domen, K. Linders, M. Van Roon, E. Robanus-Maandag, H. Te Riele, M. Van der Valk, J. Deschamps, M. Sofroniew, M. Van Lohuizen, and A. Berns. 1994. Posterior transformation, neurological abnormalities, and severe hematopoetic defects in mice with a targeted deletion of the bmi-1 proto-oncogene. Genes & Dev. 8: 757-769.
55. Wahi, M. and A.D. Johnson. 1995. Identification of genes required for α2 repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 140: 79-90.
56. Williams, F.E. and R.J. Trumbly. 1990. Characterization of TUP1, a mediator of glucose repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10: 6500-6511.
57. Williams, F.E., U. Varanasi, and R.J. Trumbly. 1991. The CYC8 and TUP1 proteins involved in glucose repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae are associated in a protein complex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11: 3307-3316.
58. Zhang, L. and L. Guarente. 1994. Evidence that Tup1/Ssn6 has a positive effect on the activity of the yeast activator HAP1. Genetics 136: 813-817.
59. Zhou, Z. and S.J. Elledge. 1992. Isolation of crt mutants constitutive for transcription of the DNA damage inducible gene RNR3 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 131: 851-866.
60. Zitomer, R.S. and C.V. Lowry. 1992. Regulation of gene expression by oxygen in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Rev. 56: 1-11.