Teachers and tests: Exploring teachers' perceptions of changes in the New York State testing program

Education Policy Analysis Archives

Volumn 8, Issue , 2000, Pages

  Grant, S G ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^b State Univ of New York at Buffalo ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0007118212     PISSN: 10682341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. (1982). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
2. Cohen, D., & Barnes, C. (1993). Pedagogy and policy. In D. Cohen, M. McLaughlin, & J. Talbert (Eds.), Teaching for understanding: Challenges for policy and practice (pp. 207- 239). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3. Comfort, K. (1991). A national standing ovation for the new performance testing. In G. Kulm & S. Malcolm (Eds.), Science assessment in the service of reform (pp. 149-161). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
4. Corbett, H. D., & Wilson, B. (1991). Testing, reform, and rebellion. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
5. Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. (1996). Policies and support professional development in an era of reform. In M. McLaughlin & I. Oberman (Eds.), Teacher learning: New policies new practices (pp. 202-219). New York: Teachers College Press.
6. Dow, P. (1991). Schoolhouse politics: Lessons from the Sputnik era. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7. Editors. (1994). Introduction. Symposium: Equity and educational assessment. Harvard Educational Review, 64, 1- 3.
8. English, F. (1980). Improving curriculum management in the schools. Washington, DC: Council for Basic Education.
9. Feltovich, P., Spiro, R., & Coulson, R. (1993). Learning, teaching, and testing for complex conceptual understanding. In N. Frederikson, R. Mislevy, & I. Bejarq (Eds.), Test theory for a new generation of tests (pp. 181-217). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10. Finn, C. (1995). Who's afraid of the big, bad test? In D. Ravitch (Ed.), Debating the future of American education: Do we need national standards and assessments? (pp. 120-144). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
11. Firestone, W., Mayrowetz, D., & Fairman, J. (1998). Performance-based assessment and instructional change: The effects of testing in Maine and Maryland. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 20(2), 95-113.
12. Freeman, D., Kuhs, T., Porter, A., Knappen, L., Floden, R., Schmidt, W., & Schwille, J. (1980). The fourth grade mathematics curriculum as inferred from textbooks and tests . East Lansing, MI: Institute for Research on Teaching, Michigan State University.
13. Fuhrman, S. (1993). The politics of coherence. In S. Fuhrman (Ed.), Designing coherent education policy: Improving the system (pp. 1-34). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
14. Fuhrman, S., Clune, W., & Elmore, R. (1988). Research on educational reforms: Lessons on the implementation of policy. Teachers College Record, 90, 237-258.
15. Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
16. Glatthorn, A. (1987). Curriculum leadership. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
17. Grant, S. G. (1996). Locating authority over content and pedagogy: Cross-current influences on teachers' thinking and practice. Theory and Research in Social Education, 24(3), 237-272.
18. Grant, S. G. (1997a). Opportunities lost: Teachers learning about the New York state social studies framework. Theory and Research in Social Education, 25(3), 259-287.
19. Grant, S. G. (1997b). A policy at odds with itself: The tension between constructivist and traditional views in the New York state social studies framework. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 13(1), 92-113.
20. Grant, S. G. (1998). Reforming reading, writing, and mathematics: Teachers' responses and the prospects for systemic reform. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21. Grant, S. G. (in press ). An uncertain lever: The influence of state-level testing in New York on teaching social studies. Teachers College Record.
22. Heubert, J., & Hauser, R. (1999). High stakes: Testing for tracking, promotion, and graduation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
23. Kellaghan, T., Madaus, G., & Airasian, P. (1982). The effects of standardized testing. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
24. Koretz, D. (1988). Arriving in Lake Woebegon: Are standardized tests exaggerating achievement and distorting instruction? American Educator, 12(2), 8-15; 46-52.
25. Koretz, D. (1995). Sometimes a cigar is only a cigar, and often a test is only a test. In D. Ravitch (Ed.), Debating the future of American education: Do we need national standards and assessments? (pp. 154-166). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
26. LeCompte, M., Preissle, J., & Tesch, R. (1993). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.
27. LeMahieu, P. (1984). The effects on achievement and instructional content of a program of student monitoring through frequent testing. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 6(2), 175-187.
28. Lusi, S. F. (1997). The role of state departments of education in complex school reform. New York: Teachers College Press.
29. Madaus, G. (1988). The influence of testing on the curriculum. In L. Tanner (Ed.), Critical issues in curriculum: 87th yearbook of the NSSE, Part 1 . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30. National Center for History in the Schools. (1994). National standards for United States history. Los Angeles: Author.
31. National Council for Social Studies. (1994). Expectations of excellence. Washington, DC: Author.
32. Natriello, G., & Pallas, A. (1998). The development and impact of high stakes testing. Available on-line: http://www.columbia.edu/~gjn6/histake. html
33. New York State Education Department. (1996). Learning standards for social studies. Albany, NY: Author.
34. New York State Education Department. (1998). Social studies resource guide. Albany, NY: Author.
35. New York State Education Department. (1999). Global history and geography Regents examination: Test sampler draft. Albany, NY: Author.
36. Noble, A., & Smith, M. L. (1994). Old and new beliefs about measurement-driven reform: "Build it and they will come." Educational Policy, 8(2), 111-136.
37. Popham, J., Cruse, K., Rankin, S., Sandifer, P., & Williams, P. (1985). Measurement-driven instruction: It's on the road. Phi Delta Kappan, 66(9), 628-634.
38. Popham, W. J. (1998). Farewell, curriculum: Confessions of an assessment convert. Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 380-384.
39. Ravitch, D. (Ed.). (1995). Debating the future of American education: Do we need national standards and assessments? Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
40. Resnick, D., & Resnick, L. (1985). Standards, curriculum, and performance: A historical and comparative perspective. Educational Researcher, 14(4), 5-20.
41. Salmon-Cox, L. (1981). Teachers and standardized achievement tests: What's really happening? Phi Delta Kappan, 62, 631- 634.
42. Schwille, J., Porter, A., Belli, G., Floden, R., Freeman, D., & Knappen, L. (1983). Teachers as policy brokers in the content of elementary school mathematics. In L. Shulman & G. Sykes (Eds.), Handbook of teaching and policy (pp. 370-391). New York: Longman.
43. Shanker, A. (1995). The case for high stakes and real consequences. In D. Ravitch (Ed.), Debating the future of American education: Do we need national standards and assessments? (pp. 145-153). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
44. Smith, M., & O'Day, J. (1991). Systemic school reform. In S. Fuhrman & B. Malen (Eds.), The politics of curriculum and testing (pp. 233-267). New York: Falmer.
45. Smith, M. L. (1991). Meanings of test preparation. American Educational Research Journal, 28(3), 521-542.
46. Smith, M. L., Heinecke, W., & Noble, A. (1999). Assessment policy and political spectacle. Teachers College Record, 101(2), 157-191.
47. Smylie, M. (1995). Teacher learning in the workplace; Implications for school reform. In T. Guskey & M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional development in education: New paradigms and practices (pp. 92-113). New York: Teachers College Press.
48. Stiggins, R., & Conklin, N. (1992). In teachers' hands: Investigating the practices of classroom assessment. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
49. Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
50. Wiles, D. (1996). Networking high performance in New York's secondary education: The Regents curriculum story. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
51. Wolf, R. (1998). National standards: Do we need them? Educational Researcher, 27, 22-5.