Genetic diversity and the mating system of a rare Mexican piñon, Pinus pinceana, and a comparison with Pinus maximartinezii (Pinaceae)

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 88, Issue 11, 2001, Pages 1977-1987

  Ledig, F Thomas ^a   Capó Arteaga, Miguel A ^b   Hodgskiss, Paul D ^a   Sbay, Hassan ^c   Flores López, Celestino ^b,d   Conkle, M Thompson ^a   Bermejo Velázquez, Basilio ^e  

^a PACIFIC SOUTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

^b UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA AGRARIA ANTONIO NARRO   (Mexico)

^c MOHAMMED V UNIVERSITY   (Morocco)

^d Col Postgraduados en Cie Agricolas ^*  (Mexico)

^e UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA CHAPINGO   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Endangered species; Fitness; Fragmentation; Genetic distance; Genetic structure; Isozymes; Pollen allele frequencies; Selfing

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001518677     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3558425     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. AGUIRRE-PLANTER, E., G. R. FURNIER, AND L. E. EGUIARTE. 2000. Low levels of genetic variation within and high levels of genetic differentiation among populations of species of Abies from southern Mexico and Guatemala. American Journal of Botany 87: 362-371.
2. ALLARD, R. W., S. K. JAIN, AND P. L. WORKMAN. 1968. The genetics of inbreeding populations. Advances in Genetics 14: 55-131.
3. BARTON, N. H., AND M. SLATKIN. 1986. A quasi-equilibrium theory of the distribution of rare alleles in a subdivided population. Heredity 56: 409-415.
4. BERMEJO-VELÁZQUEZ, B. 1993. Genetic diversity and the mating system in Pinus engelmannii Can. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
5. BYE, R. 1993. The role of humans in the diversification of plants in Mexico. In T. P. Ramamoorthy, R. Bye, A. Lot, and J. Fa [eds.], Biological diversity of Mexico: origins and distribution. 707-731. Oxford University Press, New York, New York, USA.
6. CONKLE, M. T. 1981. Isozyme variation and linkage in six conifer species. In M. T. Conkle (technical coordinator). Proceedings of the Symposium on Isozymes of North American Forest Trees and Forest Insects, 27 July 1979, Berkeley, California, 11-17. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-49. Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Berkeley, California, USA.
7. CONKLE, M. T., P. D. HODGSKISS, L. B. NUNNALLY, AND S. C. HUNTER. 1982. Starch gel electrophoresis of pine seed: a laboratory manual. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-64. Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Berkeley, California, USA.
8. DELGADO, P., D. PIÑERO, A. CHAOS, N. PÉREZ-NASSER, AND E. ALVAREZ-BUYLLA. 1999. High population differentiation and genetic variation in the endangered Mexican pine Pinus rzedowskii (Pinaceae). American Journal of Botany 86: 669-676.
9. EGUILUZ-PIEDRA, T. 1988. Distribución natural de los pinos en México. Nota técnica numero 1. Centro de Genética Forestal, A. C., Chapingo, México.
10. EGUILUZ-PIEDRA, T., A. NIEMBRO-ROCAS, AND P. M. PÉREZ-RODRÍGUEZ. 1985. Estudio morfológico de las semillas de siete especies de piñoneros mexicanos. In J. E. Flores-Lara (ed.), Memorias Primer Simposium nacional sobre Pinos Piñoneros, celebrado los dias 10, 11, y 12 junio de 1985. Reporte Cientifico Numero especial 2, 1985, 53-68. Facultad de Silvicultura y Manejo de Recursos Renovables, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo Léon, Linares, Nuevo Léon, México.
11. FARJON, A. 1999. Bigcone pinyon pine (Pinus maximartinezii Rzed..) In A. Farjon and C. N. Page (compilers), Conifers: status survey and conservation action plan, 101-102. IUCN/Species Survival Commission Conifer Specialist Group, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Gland, Switzerland.
12. FARJON, A., AND C. N. PAGE (COMPILERS). 1999. Conifers: status survey and conservation action plan. IUCN/Species Survival Commission Conifer Specialist Group. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Gland, Switzerland.
13. FARJON, A., AND B. T. STYLES. 1997. Pinus (Pinaceae). Flora Neotropica Monograph 75. New York Botanical Garden, New York, New York, USA.
14. FARRIS, J. S. 1972. Estimating phylogenetic trees from distance matrices. American Naturalist 106: 645-668.
15. FERRUSQUÍA-VILLAFRANCA, I. 1993. Geology of Mexico: a synopsis. In T. P. Ramamoorthy, R. Bye, A. Lot, and J. Fa [eds.], Biological diversity of Mexico: origins and distribution. 681-703. Oxford University Press, New York, New York, USA.
16. FRANKHAM, R. 1998. Inbreeding and extinction: island populations. Conservation Biology 12: 665-675.
17. HAMRICK, J. L., AND M. J. W. GODT. 1996. Effects of life history traits on genetic diversity in plant species. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 351: 1291-1298.
18. HAMRICK, J. L., M. J. W. GODT, AND S. L. SHERMAN-BROYLES. 1992. Factors influencing levels of genetic diversity in woody plant species. New Forests 6: 95-124.
19. KINDRED, D. 1997. "How far is it?" Distance calculator. (http:// www.indo.com/distance/, accessed 1997).
20. LEDIG, F. T. 1998. Genetic variation in Pinus. In D. M. Richardson [ed.], Ecology and biogeography of Pinus, 251-280. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
21. LEDIG, F. T. 2000. Founder effects and the genetic structure of Coulter pine. Journal of Heredity 91: 307-315.
22. LEDIG, F. T., M. T. CONKLE, B. BERMEJO-V., T. EGUILUZ-P., P. D. HODGSKISS, D. R. JOHNSON, AND W. S. DVORAK. 1999. Evidence for an extreme bottleneck in a rare Mexican pinyon: genetic diversity, disequilibrium, and the mating system in Pinus maximartinezii. Evolution 53: 91-99.
23. LEDIG, F. T., R. P. GURIES, AND B. A. BONEFELD. 1983. The relation of growth to heterozygosity in pitch pine. Evolution 37: 1227-1238.
24. LEDIG, F. T., V. JACOB-CERVANTES, P. D. HODGSKISS, AND T. EGUILUZ-PIEDRA. 1997. Recent evolution and divergence among populations of a rare Mexican endemic, Chihuahua spruce, following Holocene climatic warming. Evolution 51: 1815-1827.
25. LIEDLOFF, A. 1999. Mantel nonparametric test calculator for Windows, version 2.00. www.sci.qut.edu.au/nrsmantel.htm
26. LISTON, A., W. A. ROBINSON, D. PIÑERO, AND E. R. ALVAREZ-BUYLLA. 1999. Phylogenetics of Pinus (Pinaceae) based on nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer region sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 11: 95-109.
27. MALUSA, J. 1992. Phylogeny and biogeography of the pinyon pines (Pinus subsect. Cembroides), Systematic Botany 17: 42-66.
28. MANTEL, N. 1967. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Research 27: 209-220.
29. MARTÍNEZ, M. 1953. Las Pinaceas Mexicanas. Subsecretaría de Recursos Forestales y de Caza, Secretaría de Agricultura y Ganadería, México.
30. MOLINA-FREANER, F., P. DELGADO, D. PIÑERO, N. PEREZ-NASSER, AND E. ALVAREZ-BUYLLA. 2001. Do rare pines need different conservation strategies? Evidence from three Mexican species. Canadian Journal of Botany 79: 131-138.
31. NEI, M. 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89: 583-590.
32. PASSINI, M.-F. 1985. Algunas consideraciones acerca de los pinos piñoneros en México. In J. E. Flores-Lara (ed.), Memorias Primer Simposium nacional sobre Pinos Piñoneros, celebrado los dias 10, 11, y 12 junio de 1985. Reporte Cientifico Numero especial 2, 1985, 130-136. Facultad de Silvicultura y Manejo de Recursos Renovables. Universidad Auténoma de Nuevo Léon, Linares, Nuevo Léon, México.
33. PÉREZ DE LA ROSA, J., S. A. HARRIS, AND A. FARJON. 1995. Noncoding chloroplast DNA variation in Mexican pines. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 91: 1101-1106.
34. PERRY, J. P., JR. 1991. The pines of Mexico and Central America. Timber Press, Portland, Oregon, USA.
35. PRICE, R. A., A. LISTON, AND S. H. STRAUSS. 1998. Phylogeny and systematics of Pinus. In D. M. Richardson [ed.], Ecology and biogeography of Pinus, 130-136. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
36. RAMÍREZ-HERRERA, C. AND J. VARGAS-HERNÁNDEZ. 1996. Patterns of allozyme variation in natural populations of Pinus greggii, an endemic species from Mexico. In 14th North American Forest Biology Workshop, 16-20 June 1996, 99 (Abstract). Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada.
37. RITLAND, K. 1986. Joint maximum likelihood estimation of genetic and mating structure using open-pollinated progenies. Biometrics 42: 25-43.
38. RITLAND, K. 1989. Correlated matings in the partial selfer Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 43: 848-859.
39. RITLAND, K. 1990a. Generalized multilocus estimation program MLTF. K. Ritland, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
40. RITLAND, K. 1990b. A series of FORTRAN computer programs for estimating plant mating systems. Journal of Heredity 81: 235-237.
41. RITLAND, K. 1990c. Inferences about inbreeding depression based on changes of the inbreeding coefficient. Evolution 44: 1230-1241.
42. RITLAND, K. 1994. Multilocus mating system program MLTR, version 0.9. K. Ritland, Department of Botany, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
43. ROGERS, J. S. 1972. Measures of genetic similarity and genetic distance. Studies in Genetics, University of Texas Publication 7213: 145-153.
44. RZEDOWSKI, J. 1964. Una especie nueva de pino piñonero del Estado de Zacatecas (México). Ciencia 23: 17-20.
45. RZEDOWSKI, J. 1993. Diversity and origins of the phanerogamic flora of Mexico. In T. P. Ramamoorthy, R. Bye, A. Lot, and J. Fa [eds.], Biological diversity of Mexico: origins and distribution, 129-144. Oxford University Press, New York, New York, USA.
46. SACCHERI, I., M. KUUSSAARI, M. KANKARE, P. VIKMAN, W. FORTELIUS, AND I. HANSKI. 1998. Inbreeding and extinction in a butterfly metapopulation. Nature 392: 491-494.
47. SNEDECOR, G. W. 1956. Statistical methods applied to experiments in agriculture and biology, 5th ed. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, USA.
48. SLATKIN, M. 1985. Rare alleles as indicators of gene flow. Evolution 39: 53-65.
49. SLATKIN, M., AND N. H. BARTON. 1989. A comparison of three indirect methods for estimating average levels of gene flow. Evolution 43: 1349-1368.
50. STYLES, B. T. 1993. Genus Pinus: a Mexican purview. In T. P. Ramamoorthy, R. Bye, A. Lot, and J. Fa [eds.], Biological diversity of Mexico: origins and distribution, 397-420. Oxford University Press, New York, New York, USA.
51. SWOFFORD, D. L., AND R. B. SELANDER. 1981. BIOSYS-1: a FORTRAN program for the comprehensive analysis of electrophoretic data in population genetics and systematics. Journal of Heredity 72: 281-283.
52. WESTEMEIER, R. L., J. D. BRAWN, S. A. SIMPSON, T. L. ESKER, R. W. JANSEN, J. W. WALK, E. L. KERSHNER, J. L. BOUZAT, AND K. N. PAIGE. 1998. Tracking the long-term decline and recovery of an isolated population. Science 282: 1695-1698.
53. WRIGHT, S. 1951. The genetical structure of populations. Annals of Eugenics 15: 323-354.
54. WRIGHT, S. 1965. The interpretation of population structure by F-statistics with special regard to systems of mating. Evolution 19: 395-420.
55. ZAVARIN, E., AND K. SNAJBERK. 1987. Monoterpene differentiation in relation to the morphology of Pinus culminicola, Pinus nelsonii, Pinus pinceana and Pinus maximartinezii. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 15: 307-312.