Evidence for an extreme bottleneck in a rare Mexican pinyon: Genetic diversity, disequilibrium, and the mating system in Pinus maximartinezii

Evolution

Volumn 53, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 91-99

  Ledig, F Thomas ^a   Conkle, M Thompson ^a   Bermejo Veláquez, Basilio ^b   Eguiluz Piedra, Teobaldo ^b   Hodgskiss, Paul D ^a   Johnson, David R ^a   Dvorak, William S ^c  

^a PACIFIC SOUTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

^b UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA CHAPINGO   (Mexico)

^c NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Endangered species; Isozymes; Linkage disequilibrium; Outcrossing; Rarity

Indexed keywords

GENETIC DIVERSITY; HETEROZYGOSITY; HYBRIDIZATION; MATING SYSTEM;

GENETIC BOTTLENECK; GENETIC VARIATION; RARE SPECIES; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY;

EMBRYOPHYTA; PINUS CEMBROIDES; PINUS EDULIS; PINUS MAXIMARTINEZII;

EID: 0033042827     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb05335.x     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. ALLARD, R. W., S. K. JAIN, AND P. L. WORKMAN. 1968. The genetics of inbreeding populations. Adv. Genet. 14:55-131.
2. BETANCOURT, J. L., W. S. SCHUSTER, J. B. MITTON, AND R. S. ANDERSON. 1991. Fossil and genetic history of a pinyon pine (Pinus edulis) isolate. Ecology 72:1685-1697.
3. BOSHIER, D. H., M. R. CHASE, AND K. S. BAWA. 1995. Population genetics of Cordia alliodora (Boraginaceae), a Neotropical tree. 2. Mating system. Am. J. Bot. 82:476-483.
4. BYE, R. 1993. The role of humans in the diversification of plants in Mexico. Pp. 707-731 in T. P. Ramamoorthy. R. Bye, A. Lot, and J. Fa, eds. Biological diversity of Mexico: origins and distribution. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
5. CHAKRABORTY, R., P. A. FUERST, AND M. NEI. 1980. Statistical studies on protein polymorphism in natural populations. III. Distribution of allele frequencies and the number of alleles per locus. Genetics 94:1039-1063.
6. CONKLE, M. T. 1981. Isozyme variation and linkage in six conifer species. Pp. 11-17 in M. T. Conkle, tech. coord. Proceedings of the symposium on isozymes of North American forest trees and forest insects, July 27, 1979, Berkeley, California. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-49.
7. CONKLE, M. T., P. D. HODGSKISS, L. B. NUNNALLY, AND S. C. HUNTER. 1982. Starch gel electrophoresis of pine seed: a laboratory manual. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-64.
8. DONAHUE, J. K., AND C. MAR-LOPEZ. 1995. Observations on Pinus maximartinezii Rzed. Madroño 42:19-25.
9. EGUILUZ-PIEDRA, T., A. NIEMBRO-ROCAS, AND P. M. PÉREZ-ROGRÍGUEZ. 1985. Estudio morfológico de las semillas de siete especies de piñoneros mexicanos. Pp. 53-68 in J. E. Flores-Lara, ed. Memorias Primer Simposium nacional sobre pinos piñoneros, celebrado los dias 10, 11, y 12 junio de 1985. Reporte Cientifico Numero especial 2, 1985. Facultad de Silvicultura y Manejo de Recursos Renovables, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo Léon, Linares, México.
10. EL-KASSABY, Y. A., AND B. JAQUISH. 1996. Population density and mating pattern in western larch. J. Hered. 87:438-443.
11. EL-KASSABY, Y. A., J. RUSSELL, AND K. RITLAND. 1994. Mixed mating in an experimental population of western red cedar, Thuja plicata. J. Hered. 85:227-231.
12. EMANOIL, M., ED. 1994. Encyclopedia of endangered species. Gale Research, Detroit, MI.
13. FARJON, A., AND B. T. STYLES. 1997. Pinus (Pinaceae). Flora Neotropica Monograph 75. New York Botanical Garden, New York.
14. FOWLER, D. P., AND R. W. MORRIS. 1977. Genetic diversity in red pine: evidence for low genic heterozygosity. Can. J. For. Res. 7:343-347.
15. FRANKLIN, E. C. 1970. Survey of mutant forms and inbreeding depression in species of the family Pinaceae. U.S. Forest Service Research Paper SE-61.
16. GARCÍA-NUÑEZ, R. M., AND T. EGUILUZ-PIEDRA. 1985. Variación morfológica de Pinus maximartinezii Rzedowski. Pp. 32-47 in J. E. Flores-Lara, ed. Memorias Primer Simposium nacional sobre pinos pinóneros, celebrado los dias 10, 11, y 12 junio de 1985. Reporte Cientifico Numero especial 2, 1985. Facultad de Silvicultura y Manejo de Recursos Renovables, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Linares, México.
17. GOMEZ-POMPA, A., J. SALVADOR-FLORES, AND V. SOSA. 1987. The "pet kot": a man-made tropical forest of the Maya. Interciencia 12:10-15.
18. GURIES, R. P., AND F. T. LEDIG. 1982. Genetic diversity and population structure in pitch pine (Pinus rigida Mill.). Evolution 36: 387-402.
19. HAMRICK, J. L., AND M. J. W. GODT. 1996. Conservation genetics of endemic plant species, Pp. 281-304 in J. C. Avise and J. L. Hamrick, eds. Conservation genetics: case histories from nature. Chapman and Hall, New York.
20. LEDIG, F. T. 1998. Genetic variation in Pinus. Pp. 251-280 In D. M. Richardson, ed. Ecology and biogeography of Pinus. Cambridge Univ. Press. Cambridge, U.K.
21. LEDIG, F. T., AND M. T. CONKLE. 1983. Gene diversity and genetic structure in a narrow endemic, Torrey pine (Pinus torreyana Parry ex Carr.). Evolution 37:79-85.
22. LEDIG, F. T., V. JACOB-CERVANTES, P. D. HODGSKISS, AND T. EGUILUZ-PIEDRA. 1997. Evolution and divergence among populations of a rare Mexican endemic, Chihuahua spruce, following Holocene climatic warming. Evolution 51:1815-1827.
23. LEUNG, D. W. M., AND M. E. GARCÍA. 1985. El control de la germinación en Pinus maximartinezii Rzedowski. Pp. 89-99 In J. E. Flores-Lara, ed. Memorias Primer Simposium nacional sobre pinos piñoneros, celebrado los dias 10, 11, y 12 junio de 1985. Reporte Cientifico Numero especial 2, 1985. Facultad de Silvicultura y Manejo de Recursos Renovables, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo Léon, Linares, México.
24. MILLAR, C. I. 1993. Impact of the Eocene on the evolution of Pinus L. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 80:471-498.
25. MILLAR, C. I., AND B. B. KINLOCH. 1991. Taxonomy, phylogeny, and coevolution of pines and their stem rusts. Pp. 1-38 In Y. Hiratsuka, J. K. Samoil, P. V. Blenis, P. E. Crane, and B. J. Laishley, (eds.), Rusts of pine. Proceedings of the third IUFRO rusts of pine working party conference, September 18-22, 1989, Banff, Alberta. Information Report NOR-X-317. Forestry Canada, Northwest Region, Northern Forestry Centre, Edmonton, AB.
26. MUONA, O. 1982. Potential causes for multilocus structure in predominantly outcrossing populations. Silva Fennica 16:107-114.
27. MURAWSKI, D. A., AND J. L. HAMRICK. 1992. Mating system and phenology of Ceiba pentandra (Bombacaceae) in central Panama. J. Hered. 83:401-404.
28. MURAWSKI, D. A., J. L. HAMRICK, S. P. HUBBELL, AND R. B. FOSTER. 1990. Mating systems of two Bombacaceous trees of a neotropical moist forest. Oecologia 82:501-506.
29. MURAWSKI, D. A., I. A. U. N. GUNATILLEKE, AND K. S. BAWA. 1994. The effects of selective logging on inbreeding in Shorea megistophylla (Dipterocarpaceae) from Sri Lanka. Conserv. Biol. 8:997-1002.
30. PASSINI, M.-F. 1985. Structure et régénération des formations ligneuses à Pinus maximartinezii Rzed., Mexique. Bull. Soc. bot. Fr. 132:327-339.
31. PERRY, D. J., AND P. KNOWLES. 1990. Evidence of high self-fertilization in natural populations of eastern white cedar (Thuja occidentalis). Can. J. Bot. 68:663-668.
32. PERRY, J. P., JR. 1991. The pines of Mexico and Central America. Timber Press., Portland, OR.
33. RITLAND, K. 1990. A series of FORTRAN computer programs for estimating plant mating systems. J. Hered. 81:235-237.
34. RZEDOWSKI, J. 1964. Una especie nueva de pino piñonero del Estado de Zacatecas (México). Ciencia 23:17-20.
35. SJÖGREN, P., AND P.-I. WYÖNI. 1994. Conservation genetics and detection of rare alleles in finite populations. Conserv. Biol. 8: 267-270.
36. SNEDECOR, G. W. 1956. Statistical methods applied to experiments in agriculture and biology. 5th ed. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames.
37. SWOFFORD, D. L., AND R. B. SELANDER. 1981. BIOSYS-1: a FORTRAN program for the comprehensive analysis of electrophoretic data in population genetics and systematics. J. Hered. 72: 281-283.
38. VERA, G. 1990. Algunas especies arboreas raras o amenazadas en México. Secretaría de Agricultura y Recursos Hidráulicos (SARH), Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales y Agropecuarias (INIFAP), México.
39. WEIR, B. S. 1990. Genetic data analysis: methods for discrete population genetic data. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
40. ZAVARIN, E., AND K. SNAJBERK. 1987. Monoterpene differentiation in relation to the morphology of Pinus culminicola, Pinus nelsonii, Pinus pinceana, and Pinus maximartinezii. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 15:307-312.