Founder effects and the genetic structure of Coulter pine

Journal of Heredity

Volumn 91, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 307-315

  Ledig, F T ^a  

^a PACIFIC SOUTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ISOENZYME;

ARTICLE; DNA POLYMORPHISM; FOUNDER EFFECT; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC DISTANCE; GENOME; HETEROZYGOSITY; HOMOZYGOTE; HYBRIDIZATION; NONHUMAN; PINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0033922482     PISSN: 00221503     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jhered/91.4.307     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Adam DP and West JG, 1983. Temperature and precipitation estimates through the last glacial cycle from Clear Lake, California, pollen data. Science 219:168-170.
2. Axelrod DI, 1938. A Pliocene flora from the Mount Eden beds, Southern California. Contributions to palaeontology. Miocene and Pliocene floras of western North America. Publication no. 476. Washington, DC: Carnegie Institution of Washington; 125-183.
3. Axelrod DI, 1986. Cenozoic history of some western American pines. Ann Missouri Bot Garden 73:565-641.
4. Baker HG, 1955. Self-compatibility and establishment after "long-distance" dispersal. Evolution 9:347-349.
5. Baker HG, 1967. Support for Baker's Law - as a rule. Evolution 21:853-856.
6. Bannister MH, 1965. Variation in the breeding system of Pinus radiata. In: The genetics of colonizing species (Baker HG and Stebbins GL, eds). New York: Academic Press; 353-372.
7. Barton NH and Slatkin M, 1986. A quasi-equilibrium theory of the distribution of rare alleles in a subdivided population. Heredity 56:409-415.
8. Betancourt JL, Schuster WS, Mitton JB, and Anderson RS, 1991. Fossil and genetic history of a pinyon pine (Pinus edulis) isolate. Ecology 72:1685-1697.
9. Borchert M, 1985. Serotiny and cone-habit variation in populations of Pinus coulteri (Pinaceae) in the Southern Coast Ranges of California. Madroño 32:29-48.
10. Cole K, 1983. Late Pleistocene vegetation of Kings Canyon, Sierra Nevada, California. Quaternary Res 19:117-129.
11. Conkle MT, 1981. Isozyme variation and linkage in six conifer species. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Isozymes of North American Forest Trees and Forest Insects, Berkeley, California, July 27, 1979 (Conkle MT, tech coord). USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-49; Berkeley, CA: Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station; 11-17.
12. Conkle MT, Hodgskiss PD, Nunnally LB, and Hunter SC, 1982. Starch gel electrophoresis of pine seed: a laboratory manual. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-64. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station.
13. Critchfield WB, 1966. Crossability and relationships of the California big-cone pines. In: Joint Proceedings, Second Genetics Workshop of the Society of American Foresters and the Seventh Lake States Forest Tree Improvement Conference. USDA Forest Service Research Paper NC-6. St. Paul, MN: North Central Forest Experiment Station; 36-44.
14. Cwynar LC and MacDonald GM, 1987. Geographical variation of lodgepole pine in relation to population history. Am Nat 129:463-469.
15. Davis JT, 1974. Trade routes and economic exchange among the Indians of California. Ramona, CA: Ballena Press.
16. Davis MB, 1981. Quaternary history and the stability of forest communities. In: Forest succession: concepts and applications (West DC, Shugart HH, and Botkin DB, eds). New York: Springer-Verlag; 132-153.
17. Edwards AWF, 1974. Distance measures for phylogenetic trees. In: Genetic distance (Crow JF and Denniston C, eds). New York: Plenum Press; 41-43.
18. Farris GJ, 1983. Aboriginal use of pine nuts in California: an ethnological, nutritional, and archaeological investigation into the uses of the seeds of Pinus lambertiana Dougl. and Pinus sabiniana Dougl. by the Indians of northern California (PhD dissertation). Davis, CA: Department of Anthropology, University of California.
19. Farris JS, 1972. Estimating phylogenetic trees from distance matrices. Am Nat 106:645-668.
20. Fins L and Libby WJ, 1982. Population variation in Sequoiadendron: seed and seedling studies, vegetative propagation, and isozyme variation. Silvae Genet 31: 102-110.
21. Furnier GR and Adams WT, 1986. Geographic patterns of allozyme variation in Jeffrey pine. Am J Bot 73:1009-1015.
22. Gooch JL and Glazier DS, 1986. Levels of heterozygosity in the amphipod Gammarus minus in an area affected by Pleistocene glaciation. Am Midland Nat 116:57-63.
23. Griffin JR, 1978. Vegetation damage, Marble-Cone Fire, Los Padres National Forest, Chews Ridge report 1 - Jeffrey pine groves. (The first of four reports for purchase order 1187-PSW-77). Preliminary draft of a manuscript on file at the Institute of Forest Genetics, Placerville, California.
24. Griffin JR and Critchfield WB, 1972. The distribution of forest trees in California. USDA Forest Service Research Paper PSW-82. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station.
25. Haase, P, 1993. Genetic variation, gene flow, and the 'founder effect' in pioneer populations of Nothofagus menziesii (Fagaceae), South Island, New Zealand. J Biogeog 20:79-85.
26. Hamrick JL and Godt MJW, 1996. Conservation genetics of endemic plant species. In: Conservation genetics: case histories from nature (Avise JC and Hamrick JL, eds). New York: Chapman and Hall; 281-304.
27. Hamrick JL, Mitton JB, and Linhart YB, 1981. Levels of genetic variation in trees: influence of life history characteristics. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Isozymes of North American Forest Trees and Forest Insects, Berkeley, California, July 27, 1979 (Conkle MT, tech coord). USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-49. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station; 35-41.
28. Hopkins AD, 1938. Bioclimatics: a science of life and climate relations. Miscellaneous publication no. 280. Washington, DC: USDA.
29. Hurlbert SH, 1971. The nonconcept of species diversity: a critique and alternative parameters. Ecology 52: 577-586.
30. Krugman SL and Jenkinson JL, 1970. Pinus L. pine. In: Seeds of woody plants in the United States (Schopmeyer CS, tech coord). USDA Forest Service Agricultural Handbook no. 450. Washington, DC: USDA Forest Service; 598-638.
31. Lagercrantz U and Ryman N, 1990. Genetic structure of Norway spruce (Picea abies). concordance of morphological and allozymic variation. Evolution 44:38-53.
32. Ledig FT, 1987. Genetic structure and the conservation of California's endemic and near-endemic conifers. In: Conservation and management of rare and endangered plants: proceedings of a California conference on the conservation and management of rare and endangered plants (Elias TS, ed). Sacramento, CA: California Native Plant Society; 587-594.
33. Ledig FT, 1998. Genetic variation in Pinus. In: Ecology and biogeography of Pinus (Richardson DM, ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 251-280.
34. Levy M and Levin DA, 1971. The origin of novel flavonoids in Phlox allotetraploids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 68:1627-1630.
35. Libby WJ, 1958. The backcross hybrid Jeffrey X (Jeffrey X Coulter) pine. J For 56:840-842.
36. Little EL, Jr, 1971. Atlas of United States trees. Vol. 1. Conifers and important hardwoods. Miscellaneous publication no. 1146. Washington, DC: USDA Forest Service.
37. Mantel N, 1967. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 27:209-220.
38. McCommas SA and Bryant EH, 1990. Loss of electrophoretic variation in serially bottlenecked populations. Heredity 64:315-321.
39. Minnich RA, 1987. The distribution of forest trees in northern Baja California, Mexico. Madrono 34:98-127.
40. Moran GF, Bell JC, and Turnbull JW, 1989. A dine in genetic diversity in river she-oak Casuarina cunninghamiana. Aust J Bot 37:169-180.
41. Moran R, 1972. Plant notes from the Sierra Juárez of Baja California, México. Phytologia 35:205-214.
42. Nei M, 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89:583-590.
43. Rieseberg LH and Wendel JF, 1993. Introgression and its consequences in plants. In: Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process (Harrison RG, ed). New York: Oxford University Press; 70-109.
44. Rogers JS, 1972. Measures of genetic similarity and genetic distance. Studies in Genetics, University of Texas publication 7213. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press; 145-153.
45. Slatkin M, 1985. Rare alleles as indicators of gene flow. Evolution 39:53-65.
46. Steinhoff RJ, Joyce DG, and Fins L, 1983. Isozyme variation in Pinus monticola. Can J For Res 13:1122-1132.
47. Sudworth GB, 1908. Forest trees of the Pacific Slope. Washington, DC: USDA Forest Service.
48. Swofford DL and Selander RB, 1981. BIOSYS-1: a FORTRAN program for the comprehensive analysis of electrophoretic data in population genetics and systematics. J Hered 72:281-283.
49. Vale TR, 1979. Pinus coulteri and wildfire on Mount Diablo, California. Madroño 26:135-140.
50. Wheeler NC and Guries RP, 1982a. Biogeography of lodgepole pine. Can J Bot 60:1805-1814.
51. Wheeler NC and Guries RP, 1982b. Population structure, genic diversity, and morphological variation in Pinus contorta Dougl. Can J For Res 12:595-606.
52. Woodruff DS, 1989. Genetic anomalies associated with Cerion hybrid zones: the origin and maintenance of new electromorphic variants called hybrizymes. Biol J Linn Soc 36:281-294.
53. Wright S, 1951. The genetical structure of populations. Ann Eugen 15:323-354.
54. Wright S, 1965. The interpretation of population structure by F-statistics with special regard to systems of mating. Evolution 19:395-420.
55. Wright S, 1978. Evolution and the genetics of populations. Vol. 4. Variability within and among natural populations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
56. Yeh FC-H and O'Malley D, 1980. Enzyme variations in natural populations of Douglas-fir. Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco, from British Columbia. 1. Genetic variation patterns in coastal populations. Silvae Genet 28:83-92.
57. Zobel B, 1951. The natural hybrid between Coulter and Jeffrey pines. Evolution 5:405-413.
58. Zobel B. 1953. Jeffrey pine in the South Coast Ranges of California. Madroño 11:283-284.