Identity priming in english is compromised by phonological ambiguity

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 775-790

  Lukatela, Georgije ^a,b   Frost, Stephen J ^a   Turve, M T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b HASKINS LABORATORIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; PERCEPTION; PHONETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PHONETICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 0033141902     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.25.3.775     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Balota, D., & Chumbley, J. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 340-357.
2. Bosman, A. M. T., & de Groot, A. M. B. (1996). Phonologic mediation is fundamental to reading: Evidence from beginning readers. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 49A, 715-744.
3. Brown, G. D. A. (1987). Resolving inconsistency: A computational model of word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 1-23.
4. Buchanan, L., Hildebrandt, N., & MacKinnon, G. E. (1995). Phonological processing of nonwords by a deep dyslexic patient: A ROWSE is implicitly a ROSE. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 8, 163-181.
5. Buchanan, L., Hildebrandt, N., & MacKinnon, G. E. (1996). Phonological processing of nonwords in deep dyslexia: Typical and independent. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 9, 113-133.
6. Carello, C., Turvey, M. T., & Lukatela, G. (1992). Can theories of word recognition remain stubbornly nonphonological? In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 211-226). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
7. Caudill, M., & Butler, C. (1990). Naturally intelligent systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589-608.
9. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance (Vol. 6, pp. 535-555). Hillsdale, NJ; Erlbaum.
10. Coltheart, M., & Rastle, K. (1994). Serial processing in reading aloud: Evidence for dual-route models of reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1197-1211.
11. Evett, L. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1981). The use of abstract graphemic information in lexical access. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 33A, 325-350.
12. Feustel, T. C., Shiffrin, R. M., & Salasoo, A. (1983). Episodic and lexical contributions to the repetition effect in word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 309-346.
13. Forster, K. (1990). Lexical processing. In D. Osherson & H. Lasnik (Eds.), An invitation to cognitive science: Language (pp. 95-132). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Forster, K., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 680-698.
15. Forster, K., & Davis, C. (1991). The density constraint on form-priming in the naming task: Interference effects from a masked prime. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 1-25.
16. Forster, K., Davis, C., Schoknecht, C., & Carter, R. (1987). Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition of partial activation? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 39A, 211-251.
17. Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (1990). DMASTR Display System for Mental Chronometry (Version 2.0) [Computer software]. Tucson, AZ: Authors.
18. Forster, K., & Veres, C. (1998). The prime lexicality effect: Form priming as a function of prime awareness, lexical status, and discrimination difficulty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 498-514.
19. Grainger, J., & Ferrand, L. (1996). Masked orthographic and phonological priming in visual word recognition and naming: Cross-talk comparisons. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 623-647.
20. Gorden, B. (1983). Lexical access and lexical decision: Mechanisms of frequency sensitivity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 24-44.
21. Grossberg, S. (1982). Studies of mind and brain. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
22. Grossberg, S., & Stone, G. O. (1986). Neural dynamics of word recognition and recall: Priming, learning, and resonance. Psychological Review, 93, 46-74.
23. Henderson, J. M., Dixon, P., Petersen, A., Twilley, L. C., & Ferreira, F. (1995). Evidence for the use of phonological representations during transsaccadic word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 82-97.
24. Humphreys, G. W., Besner, D., & Quinlan, P. T. (1988). Event perception and the word repetition effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 51-67.
25. Humphreys, G. W., Evert, L. J., Quinlan, P. T., & Besner, D. (1987). Orthographic priming: Qualitative differences between priming from identified and unidentified primes. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII (pp. 105-125). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Humphreys, G. W., Evett, L. J., & Taylor, D. E. (1982). Automatic phonological priming in visual word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 10, 576-590.
27. Jared, D. (1997). Spelling-sound consistency affects the naming of high-frequency words. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 505-529.
28. Jared, D., McRae, K., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1990). The basis of consistency effects in word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 687-715.
29. Kawamato, A. H., & Zemblidge, J. (1992). Pronunciation of homographs. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 349-374.
30. Liberman, A. M. (1995). The relation of speech to reading and writing. In B. de Gelder & J. Morais (Eds.), Speech and reading: A comparative approach (pp. 17-32). Hove, England: Erlbaum (UK); Taylor & Francis.
31. Lukatela, G., Carello, C., Savić, M., Urošević, Z., & Turvey, M. T. (1998). When nonwords activate semantics better than words. Cognition, 68, B31-B40.
32. Lukatela, G., Carello, C., & Turvey, M. T. (1990). Phonemic priming by words and pseudowords. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 2, 375-394.
33. Lukatela, G., Feldman, L. B., Turvey, M. T., Carello, C., & Katz, L. (1989). Context effects in bi-alphabetical word perception. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 214-236.
34. Lukatela, G., Savić, M., Urošević, Z., & Turvey, M. T. (1997). Phonological ambiguity impairs identity priming in naming and lexical decision. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 360-381.
35. Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. (1994a). Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 1. Evidence from associative priming by words, homophones, and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 107-128.
36. Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. (1994b). Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 2. Evidence from phonological priming by homophones and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 331-353.
37. Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. (1996). Inhibition of naming by rhyming primes. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 823-835.
38. Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. (1998). Reading in two alphabets. American Psychologist, 53, 1057-1072.
39. Lukatela, G., Turvey, M. T., Feldman, L. B., Carello, C., & Katz, L. (1989). Alphabetic priming in bi-alphabetical word perception. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 237-254.
40. Lukatela, G., Turvey, M. T., & Todorović, D. (1991). Is alphabet biasing in bialphabetical word perception automatic and prelexical? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 653-663.
41. Meyer, D. E., Schvaneveldt, R. W., & Ruddy, M. G. (1974). Functions of graphemic and phonemic codes in visual word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 2, 309-321.
42. Neely, J. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & G. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264-336). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Noms, D. (1984). The effects of frequency, repetition and stimulus quality in visual word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 36A, 507-518.
44. Norris, D. (1994). A quantitative multiple-levels model of reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1212-1232.
45. Pollatsek, A., Lesch, M., Morris, R. K., & Rayner, K. (1992). Phonological codes are used in integrating information across saccades in word identification and reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 148-162.
46. Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1989). Reading. In M. I. Posner (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive science (pp. 401-436). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47. Pugh, K. R., Rexer, K., & Katz, L. (1994). Evidence of flexible coding in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 807-825.
48. Scarborough, D. L., Cortese, D., & Scarborough, H. S. (1977). Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 1-17.
49. Seidenberg, M. S. (1992). Beyond orthographic depth in reading: Equitable division of labor. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 85-118). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
50. Seidenberg, M. S., Waters, G. S., Barnes, M., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1984). When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 383-404.
51. Seidenberg, M. S., Waters, G. S., Sanders, M., & Langer, P. (1984). Pré-and post-lexical loci of contextual effects on word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 12, 315-328.
52. Stone, G. O., & Van Orden, G. C. (1994). Building a resonance framework for word recognition using design and system principles. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1248-1268.
53. Taraban, R., & McClelland, J. (1987). Conspiracy effects in word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 608-631.
54. Van Orden, G. C. (1991). Phonologic mediation is fundamental to reading. In D. Besner & G. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition. (pp. 77-103). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
55. Van Orden, G. C., & Goldinger, S. D. (1994). Interdependence of form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1269-1291.
56. Van Orden, G. C., Pennington, B. F., & Stone, G. O. (1990). Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics. Psychological Review, 97, 488-522.