An evaluation of the two-cycles model of phonology assembly

Journal of Memory and Language

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 183-207

  Lukatela, Georgije ^a   Turvey, M T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

Masking; Phonology; Priming; Reading

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001408796     PISSN: 0749596X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jmla.1999.2672     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Berent I. Phonological priming in the lexical decision task: Regularity effects are not necessary evidence for assembly. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 23:1997;1727-1742.
2. Berent I., Perfetti C. A. A Rose is a REEZ: The two-cycles model of phonology assembly in reading English. Psychological Review. 102:1995;146-184.
3. Bowman C., Goldstein L. Dynamics and articulatory phonology. Port R. F., van Gelder T. Mind as motion. 1995;175-193 MIT Press, Cambridge.
4. Carello C., Turvey M. T., Lukatela G. Can theories of word recognition remain stubbornly nonphonological. Frost R., Katz L. Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning. 1992;211-226 North-Holland, Amsterdam.
5. Coltheart M., Curtis B., Atkins P., Haller M. Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed processing approaches. Psychological Review. 100:1993;589-608.
6. Denes P. B., Pinson E. N. The speech chain. 1973;Anchor PressDoubleday, New York.
7. Ferrand L., Grainger J. Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition; Evidence from masked nonword priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 42A:1992;353-372.
8. Ferrand L., Grainger J. The time-course of orthographic and phonological code activation in the early phases of visual word recognition. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society. 31:1993;119-122.
9. Ferrand L., Grainger J. Effects of orthography are independent of phonology in masked form priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 47A:1994;365-382.
10. Forster K. Form priming by masked primes: The best-match hypothesis. Coltheart M. Attention and performance XII. 1987;127-146 Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
11. Forster K., Davis C. The density constraint on form-priming in the naming task: Interference effects from a masked prime. Journal of Memory and Language. 30:1991;1-25.
12. Frost R. Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin. 123:1998;71-99.
13. Goldsmith J. A. Autosegmental and metrical phonology. 1990;Blackwell, Cambridge.
14. Grainger J., Ferrand L. Phonology and Orthography in visual word recognition: Effects of masked homophone primes. Journal of Memory and Language. 33:1994;218-233.
15. Grainger J., Ferrand L. Masked orthographic and phonological priming in visual word recognition and naming: Cross-talk comparisons. Journal of Memory and Language. 35:1996;623-647.
16. Grainger J., Jacobs A. M. Masked constituent letter priming in an alphabet decision task. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 3:1991;413-434.
17. Grainger J., O'Regan J. K. A psychophysical investigation of language priming effects in two English-French bilinguals. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 4:1992;323-339.
18. Humphreys G. W., Evett L. J., Taylor D. E. Automatic phonological priming in visual word recognition. Memory & Cognition. 10:1982;576-590.
19. Kaye J. Phonology: A cognitive view. 1989;Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
20. Kawamoto A. H. Distributed representations of ambiguous words and their resolution in a connectionist network. Small S. I., Cottrell G. W., Tannenhaus M. K. Lexical ambiguity resolution. 1988;195-228 Morgan Kaufman, San Mateo.
21. Kawamoto A. H., Kello C. T., Jones R., Bame K. Initial phoneme versus whole-word criterion to initial pronunciation: Evidence based on response latency and initial phoneme duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 24:1998;862-885.
22. Kučera J., Francis W. N. Computational analysis of present day American English. 1967;Brown Univ. Press, Providence.
23. Lesch M. F., Pollatsek A. Evidence for the use of assembled phonology in accessing the meaning of printed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 24:1998;573-592.
24. Lukatela G., Frost S. J., Turvey M. T. Phonological priming by masked nonword primes in the lexical decision task. Journal of Memory and Language. 39:1998a;666-683.
25. Lukatela G., Carello C., Savić M., Urosević Z., Turvey M. T. When nonwords activate semantics better than words. Cognition. 68:1998b;B31-B40.
26. Lukatela G., Frost S. J., Turvey M. T. Identity priming in English is compromised by phonological ambiguity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 25:1999;775-790.
27. Lukatela G., Turvey M. T. Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 1. Evidence from associative priming by words, homophones, and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 123:1994a;107-128.
28. Lukatela G., Turvey M. T. Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 2. Evidence from phonological priming by homophones and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 123:1994b;331-353.
29. Lukatela G., Turvey M. T. Reading in two alphabets. American Psychologist. 53:1998;1057-1072.
30. McCarthy J. J. Linear order in phonological representation. Linguistic Inquiry. 20:1989;71-99.
31. Michaels C. F., Turvey M. T. Central sources of visual masking: Indexing structures supporting seeing at a single brief glance. Psychological Research (Psychologische Forschung). 4:1979;1-61.
32. Norris D. A quantitative multiple-levels model of reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 20:1994;1212-1232.
33. Perfetti C. A., Bell L. C. Phonemic activation during the first 40 ms of word identification: Evidence from backward masking and priming. Journal of Memory and Language. 30:1991;473-485.
34. Perfetti, C. A, Zhang, S, &, Berent, I. 1992, Reading in English and Chinese: Evidence for a "universal" phonological principle. In, R. Frost & L. Katz, (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology and meaning, (pp, 227,-248), Amsterdam, North Holland.
35. Plaut D. C., McClelland J. L., Seidenberg M. S., Patterson K. E. Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review. 103:1996;56-115.
36. Rayner K., Sereno S. C., Lesch M. F., Pollatsek A. Phonological codes are automatically activated during reading: Evidence from an eye movement priming paradigm. Psychological Science. 6:1995;26-32.
37. Saltzman E. Dynamics and coordinate systems in skilled sensorimotor activity. Port R. F., van Gelder T. Mind as motion. 1995;149-174 MIT Press, Cambridge.
38. Seidenberg M. S., McClelland J. L. A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review. 96:1989;523-568.
39. Shallice T., Warrington E. K., McCarthy R. Reading without semantics. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 35:1983;111-138.
40. Stone G. O., Van Hoy M., Van Orden G. C. Perception is a two-way street: Feedforward and feedback phonology in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language. 36:1997;337-359.
41. Turvey M. T. On peripheral and central processes in vision: Inferences from an information processing analysis of masking with patterned stimuli. Psychological Review. 80:1973;1-52.
42. Ulrich R., Miller J. Effects of truncation on reaction time analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 123:1994;34-80.
43. Van Orden G. C., Goldinger S. D. Interdependence of form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 20:1994;1269-1291.
44. Van Orden G. C., Pennington B. F., Stone G. O. Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics. Psychological Review. 97:1990;488-522.
45. Xu B., Perfetti C. A. Nonstrategic subjective threshold effects in phonemic masking. Memory & Cognition. 27:1999;26-36.
46. Ziegler J. C., Jacobs A. M. Phonological information provides early sources of constraint in the processing of letter strings. Journal of Memory and Language. 34:1995;567-593.