Photoemission study of aluminum/tris-(8-hydroxyquinoline) aluminum and aluminum/LiF/tris-(8-hydroxyquinoline) aluminum interfaces

Journal of Applied Physics

Volumn 87, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 375-379

  Le, Quoc Toan ^a   Yan, L Li ^a   Gao, Yongli ^a   Mason, M G ^b   Giesen, D J ^b   Tang, C W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

^b EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000009891     PISSN: 00218979     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.371870     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. C. W. Tang and S. A. VanSlyke, Appl. Phys. Lett. 51, 913 (1987).
2. S. A. VanSlyke, C. H. Chen, and C. W. Tang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 2160 (1996).
3. Y. Gao, K. T. Park, and B. R. Hsieh, J. Appl. Phys. 73, 7894 (1993).
4. H. Razafitrimo, K. T. Park, E. Ettedgui, Y. Gao, and B. R. Hsieh, Polym. Int. 36, 147 (1995).
5. L. S. Hung, C. W. Tang, and M. G. Mason, Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 152 (1997).
6. G. E. Jabbour, B. Kippelen, N. R. Armstrong, and N. Peyghambarian, Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 1185 (1998).
7. G. E. Jabbour, Y. Kawabe, S. E. Shaheen, J. F. Wang, M. M. Morrell, B. Kippelen, and N. Peyghambarian, Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 1762 (1997).
8. S. E. Shaheen et al., J. Appl. Phys. 84, 2324 (1998).
9. C. H. Lee, Synth. Met. 91, 125 (1997).
10. F. Li, H. Tang, J. Anderegg, and J. Shinar, Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 1233 (1997).
11. H. Tang, F. Li, and J. Shinar, Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 2560 (1997).
12. J. Kido and T. Matsumoto, Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 2866 (1998).
13. T. Mori, H. Fujikawa, S. Tokito, and Y. Taga, Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 2763 (1998).
14. V.-E. Choong, M. G. Mason, C. W. Tang, and Y. Gao. Appl. Phys. Lett. 72, 2689 (1998).
15. A. Rajagopal and A. Kahn, J. Appl. Phys. 84, 355 (1998).
16. K. Seki and H. Ishii, J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 88-91, 821 (1998).
17. R. Schlaf, B. A. Parkinson, P. A. Lee, K. W. Nebesny, and N. R. Armstrong, Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 1026 (1998).
18. K. Horn, Appl. Phys. A: Solids Surf. 51, 289 (1990).
19. Geometry and charges were calculated with GAUSSIAN98, Revision A.7GAUSSiAN, M. J. Frisch, et al. (Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, 1998). The calculations used the gradient corrected hybrid Density Functional Theory/Hartree Fock functional B3LYP. The basis set used was 3-21G*.
20. A. Cunoni et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 72, 1575 (1998).
21. The BE of energy levels in solids are conventionally measured with respect to the Fermi level. If a vacuum level reference were chosen, the shifts would be as much as 0.6 eV larger at the highest coverage. When a true chemical reaction occurs, as in the present case, the proper choice of reference level is not clear. J. W. Gadzuk, Phys. Rev. B 14, 2267 (1976).
22. S.-T. Lee, X. Y. Hou, M. G. Mason, and C. W. Tang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 72, 1593 (1998).
23. H. Ishii and K. Seki, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 44, 1295 (1997).
24. M. G. Mason, S.-T. Lee, L. S. Liao, and L. F. Cheng (unpublished).
25. N. Johansson, T. Osada, S. Stafström, W. R. Salaneck, V. Parente, D. A. Dos Santos, X. Crispin, and J. L. Brédas, J. Chem. Phys. 111, 2157 (1999).
26. M. G. Mason and C. W. Tang (unpublished).