A mixed relationship: Bureaucracy and school performance

Public Administration Review

Volumn 64, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 728-736

  Smith, Kevin B ^a   Larimer, Christopher W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 9944250333     PISSN: 00333352     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00419.x     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. Baltagi, Badi Ha. 1995. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. New York: John Wiley.
2. Baumol, William J., and Alan S. Binder. 1994. Microeconomics: Principles and Policy. Orlando, FL: Dryden Press.
3. Belfield, Clive R., and Henry M. Levin. 2002. The Effects of Competition on Educational Outcomes: A Review of U.S. Evidence. New York: National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education, Teachers College, Columbia University.
4. Benveniste, Luis, Martin Carnoy, and Richard Rothstein. 2002. All Else Equal: Are Public and Private Schools Different? New York: Taylor and Francis.
5. Bohte, John. 2001. School Bureaucracy and Student Performance at the Local Level. Public Administration Review 61(1): 92-99.
6. Boyne, George A. 1998. Public Choice Theory and Local Government. New York: St. Martin's Press.
7. Box, Richard C., Gary S. Marshall, B. J. Reed, and Christine M. Reed. 2001. New Public Management and Substantive Democracy. Public Administration Review 61(5): 608-19.
8. Browning, Edgar K., and Mark A. Zupan. 2002. Microeconomic Theory and Applications. New York: John Wiley.
9. Callan, Eamon. 1997. Creating Citizens: Political Education and Liberal Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
10. Chubb, John, and Terry Moe. 1988. Politics, Markets and the Organization of Schools. American Political Science Review 82(4): 1065-87.
11. _. 1990. Politics, Markets and America's Schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
12. Cookson, Peter. 1994. School Choice. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
13. Downs, George W., and Patrick D. Larkey. 1986. The Search for Government Efficiency: From Hubris to Helplessness. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
14. Friedman, Milton. 1955. The Role of Government in Education. In Economics and the Public Interest, edited by Robert A. Solo, 123-44. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
15. Goodsell, Charles. 1994. The Case for Bureaucracy. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
16. Hanushek, Eric. 1981. Throwing Money at Schools. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 1(1): 19-41.
17. _. 1997. Assessing the Effects of School Resources on Student Performance: An Update. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 19(2): 141-64.
18. Henig, Jeffrey. 1994. Rethinking School Choice: Limits of the Market Metaphor. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19. Hess, Fredrick M. 1999. Spinning Wheels: The Politics of Urban School Reform. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
20. King, Gary. 1995. Replication, Replication. PS: Political Science and Politics 28(3): 444-52.
21. Lankford, Hamilton, and James Wyckoff. 1992. Primary and Secondary School Choice among Public and Religious Alternatives. Economics of Education Review 11(4): 317-37.
22. McCabe, Barbara Coyle, and Janet Coble Vinzant. 1999. Governance Lessons: The Case of Charter Schools. Administration and Society 31(3): 361-77.
23. Meier, Kenneth J., Warren S. Eller, Robert D. Wrinkle, and J. L. Polinard. 2001. Zen and the Art of Policy Analysis: A Response to Nielsen and Wolf. Journal of Politics 63(2): 616-29.
24. Meier, Kenneth J., J. L. Polinard, and Robert D. Wrinkle. 1999. Representative Bureaucracy and Distributional Equity: Addressing the Hard Question. Journal of Politics 61(4): 1025-39.
25. _. 2000. Bureaucracy and Organizational Performance: Causality Arguments about Public Schools. American Journal of Political Science 44(3): 590-602.
26. Nielsen, Laura B., and Patrick J. Wolf. 2001. Representative Bureaucracy and Harder Questions: A Response to Meier, Wrinkle, and Polinard. Journal of Politics 63(2): 598-615.
27. Niskanen, William. 1971. Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Chicago: Aldine, Atherton.
28. Pindyck, Robert S., and Daniel L. Rubinfeld. 1991. Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
29. Ravitch, Diane. 1997. New York the Obsolete Factory. In New Schools for a New Century: The Redesign of Urban Education, edited by Diane Ravitch and Joseph P. Viteritti, 17-36. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
30. Rothstein, Richard. 1997. What Do We Know About Declining (or Rising) Student Achievement? Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service.
31. Sayrs, Lois W. 1989. Pooled Time Series Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
32. Simon, Herbert. 1947. Administrative Behavior. New York: Free Press.
33. Smith, Kevin B., and Scott Granberg-Rademacker. 2003. Money Only Matters if You Want It To? Exposing the Normative Implications of Empirical Research. Political Research Quarterly 56(2): 223-32.
34. Smith, Kevin B., and Kenneth J. Meier. 1994. Politics, Bureaucrats, and Schools. Public Administration Review 54(4): 55158.
35. _. 1995. The Case Against School Choice. New York: M. E. Sharpe.
36. Tullock, Gordon. 1965. The Politics of Bureaucracy. Washington, DC: Public Affairs Press.
37. Tyack, David, and Larry Cuban. 1995. Tinkering Toward Utopia: A Century of Public School Reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38. Versiegen, Deborah A., and Richard A. King. 1998. The Relationship between School Spending and Student Achievement: A Review and Analysis of 35 Years of Production Function Research. Journal of Education Finance 24(3): 243-62.
39. Wenger, Jennie. 2000. What Do Schools Produce? Implications of Multiple Outputs in Education. Contemporary Economic Policy 18(l):27-36.
40. Winglee, Marianne, David Marker, Allison Henderson, Beth Aronstamm Young, and Lee Hoffman. 2000. A Recommended Approach to Providing High School Dropout and Completion Rates at the State Level. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
41. Zellner, Arnold. 1962. An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Tests for Aggregation Bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association 57(298): 248-68.