Zen and the Art of Policy Analysis: A Response to Nielsen and Wolf

Journal of Politics

Volumn 63, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 616-629

  Meier, Kenneth J ^a   Eller, Warren S ^a   Wrinkle, Robert D ^b   Polinard, J L ^b  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS PAN AMERICAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937335068     PISSN: 00223816     EISSN: 14682508     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/0022-3816.00082     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Aaron, Robert, and Glen Powell. 1982. “Feedback Practices as a Function of Teacher and Pupil Race during Reading Group Instruction.” Journal of Negro Education 51 (Winter): 50–59.
2. Baltagi, Badi H. 1995. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
3. Baltagi, Badi H. 1999. Econometrics. 2nd Rev. ed. New York: Springer.
4. Beck, Nathaniel, and Jonathan N. Katz. 1995. “What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data.” American Political Science Review 89 (September): 634–647.
5. Beck, Nathaniel, and Jonathan N. Katz. 1996. “Nuisance vs. Substance: Specifying and Estimating Time-Series Cross-Section Models.” Political Analysis 6: 1–36.
6. Cole, Beverly P. 1986. “The Black Educator: An Endangered Species.” Journal of Negro Education 55 (Summer): 326–334.
7. Davidson, Russell, and James G. MacKinnon. 1993. Estimation and Inference in Econometrics. New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Fox, John. 1997. Applied Regression Analysis, Linear Models, and Related Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Greene, William H. 1997 Econometric Analysis. 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
10. Hamilton, Lawrence C. 1992. Regression with Graphics. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
11. Henderson, Leaneal J. 1979. Administrative Advocacy: Black Administration in Urban Bureaucracies. Palo Alto, CA: R & E Research Associates.
12. Hsiao, Cheng. 1986. Analysis of Panel Data. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13. Maddala, G. S. 1992. Introduction to Econometrics. 2nd ed. New York: Macmillan.
14. Meier, Kenneth J. 1993. “Latinos and Representative Bureaucracy: Testing the Thompson and Henderson Hypotheses.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 3 (October): 393–415.
15. Meier, Kenneth J., and Jeff Gill. 2000. What Works: A New Approach to Program and Policy Analysis. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
16. Meier, Kenneth J., Robert D. Wrinkle, and J. L. Polinard. 1999. “Representative Bureaucracy and Distributional Equity: Addressing the Hard Question.” Journal of Politics 61 (November): 1025–1039.
17. Meier, Kenneth J., and Kevin B. Smith. 1994. “Representative Democracy and Representative Bureaucracy.” Social Science Quarterly 75 (December): 798–803.
18. Meier, Kenneth J., and Joseph Stewart, Jr. 1991. The Politics of Hispanic Education. Albany: SUNY Press.
19. Meier, Kenneth J., Joseph Stewart, Jr., and Robert E. England. 1989. Race, Class and Education. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
20. Moore, Helen A., and David R. Johnson. 1983. “A Reexamination of Elementary School Teachers' Expectations: Evidence of Sex and Ethnic Segmentation.” Social Science Quarterly 64 (September): 460–475.
21. Nielsen, Laura, and Patrick Wolf. N.d. “Representative Bureaucracy and Harder Questions: A Response to Meier, Wrinkle, and Polinard.” Journal of Politics (forthcoming).
22. Nielsen, Laura, and Patrick Wolf. 1999. “Representative Bureaucracy and Harder Questions: A Response to Meier, Wrinkle, and Polinard.” typescript, Georgetown University.
23. Selden, Sally Coleman, Jeffrey L. Brudney, and J. Edward Kellough. 1997. “Bureaucracy as a Representative Institution.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (July): 717–744.
24. Thompson, Frank J. 1976. “Minority Groups in Public Bureaucracies.” Administration and Society 8 (August): 201–226.
25. Weiher, Gregory. 2000. “Minority Student Achievement: Passive Representation and Social Context in Schools.” Journal of Politics 62 (August): 886–895.
26. Weissberg, Robert. 1978. “Collective vs. Dyadic Representation in Congress.” American Political Science Review 72 (June): 535–547.