All else equal: Are public and private schools different?

All Else Equal: Are Public and Private Schools Different?

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 1-206

  Benveniste, Luis ^a   Carnoy, Martin ^a   Rothstein, Richard ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84909177703     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315023458     Document Type: Book

References (92)

1. Abelmann, Charles, and Richard Elmore, with Johanna Even, Susan Kenyon, and Joanne Marshall (1999).“When Accountability Knocks, W ill Anyone Answer?” Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
2. Alexander,K.L., and A.M. Pallas (1982). “Reply to Coleman.” American Sociological Review, 47 (6): 822-824.
3. Alexander,K. L., and A. M. Pallas (1983). “Private Schools and Public Policy: New Evidence on Cognitive Achievement in Public and Private Schools.” Sociology of Education, 56: 170 -182.
4. Alexander,K. L., and Pallas, A. M. (1987). “School Sector and Cognitive Performance: When is a Little a Little?” In Comparing Public and Private Schools. Volume 2: School Achievement, edited by E. H. Haertel, T. James, and H. M. Levin. New York: Falmer Press, pp. 89 - 111.
5. American Federation of Teachers (2000). Trends in Student Achievement for Edison Schools, Inc.: The Emerging Track Record. Downloaded from: www.aft.org/research/edisonschools/ 2000edison.pdf
6. Anyon, Jean (1983). “Social Class and the Hidden Curriculum of Work.” The Hidden Curriculum and Moral Education: Deception or Discovery? Henry Giroux and David Purpel. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan Publishing Corp. pp. 143 - 167.
7. Baker, David P., and Cornelius Riordan (1999a). “The ‘Eliting’ of the Common American Catholic School and the National Education Crisis.” Phi Delta Kappan, 80(1): 16 - 23.
8. Baker, David P., and Cornelius Riordan (1999b). “It’s Not about the Failure of Catholic Schools: Its about Demographic Transformations.” Phi Delta Kappan, 80(6): 462 - 463, 478.
9. Bositis, Davis (1999). 1999 National Opinion Poll-Education. Washington, DC: Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies.
10. Bositis, David (2001).“School Vouchers along the Color Line,” New York Times, August 15, p. A27.
11. Bowles, Samuel, and Henry M. Levin (1968). “The Determinants of Schooling Achievement: An Appraisal of Some Recent Evidence,” Journal of Human Resources, 3 (1) : 3 -24.
12. Brown, Byron (1992). “Why Governments Run Schools.” Economics of Education Review, 11 (4): 287 -300.
13. Bryk, Anthony S., and Valerie Lee (1992). “Is Politics the Problem and Markets the Answer? An Essay Review of Politics, Markets and America’s Schools.” Economics of Education Review, 11 (4): 439 - 451.
14. Bryk, Anthony S., Valerie Lee, and Peter Holland (1993). Catholic Schools and the Common Good. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15. Carnoy, Martin (2000). Sustaining the New Economy: Work, Family, and Community in the Information Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press and Russell Sage Foundation.
16. Carnoy, Martin (2001). School Vouchers: Examining the Evidence. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
17. Carnoy, Martin, and Henry M. Levin (1985). Schooling and Work in the Democratic State. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
18. Carnoy, Martin, and Derek Shearer (1980). Economic Democracy. Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
19. Catterall, James S. (1988). “Private School Participation and Public School Policy.” In Comparing Public and Private Schools, Vol. 1: Institutions and Organizations, edited by T. James and H. M. Levin. Philadelphia: Falmer Press, pp. 46 - 60.
20. Center for the Study of Public Policy (1970). Education Vouchers: A Report on Financing Elementary Education by Grants to Parents. Cambridge, MA: Center for the Study of Public Policy.
21. Chubb, John, and Terry Moe (1990). Politics, Markets, and America’s Schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
22. Clune, William H., and John F. Witte (eds.) (1990). Choice and Control in American Education. Volume 1: The Theory of Choice and Control in Education. New York: Falmer Press.
23. Cobb, Casey, and Gene Glass (2001). “U.S. Charter Schools and Ethnic Segregation: Inspecting the Evidence.” International Journal of Educational Reform, 10 (4): 381 - 395.
24. Coleman, J. S. (1990). “Choice, Community, and Future Schools,” In Choice and Control in American Education, Volume 1: The Theory of Choice and Control in Education, edited by W. H.Clune, and J.F.Witte. London: Falmer Press, p. 9.
25. Coleman, James S., Thomas Hoffer, and Sally Kilgore (1982). High School Achievement. New York: Basic Books.
26. Coleman, James, and Thomas Hoffer (1987). Public and Private High Schools: The Impact of Communities. New York: Basic Books.
27. Coleman, J. S., et al. (1966). Equality of Educational Opportunity Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
28. Cookson, Peter (1994). School Choice: The Struggle for the Soul of American Education. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
29. Cookson, Peter, and Caroline Hodges Persell (1985). Preparing for Power. New York: Basic Books.
30. Cooper, Bruce E. (1988). “The Changing Universe of U.S. Private Schools,” in James, T. and H. M. Levin (eds.), Comparing Public and Private Schools, Vol. 1: Institutions and Organizations. Philadelphia: Falmer Press, pp. 18-45.
31. Dewey, John (1976). The Middle Works, 1902-1903. Edited by Jo Ann Boydston. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
32. Elmore, Richard (1993). “School Decentralization: Who Gains? Who Loses?” In Decentralization and School Improvement, edited by Jane Hannaway and Martin Carnoy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 33 -54.
33. Evans,W.N. and R.M.Schwab (1995). “Finishing High School and Starting College: Do Catholic Schools Make a Difference?” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110 : 941 - 974.
34. Finn, Chester E. (1990). “Why We Need Choice.” In Choice in Education: Potential and Problems, edited by W. L. Boyd and H. J. Walberg. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan Publishing Corp., pp. 21 - 42.
35. Finn, Chester, Bruno Manno, and Greg Vanourek (1999). Charter Schools in Action: Renewing Public Education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36. Friedman, Milton (1955). “The Role of Government in Education.” In Economics and the Public Interest, edited by Robert A. Solo. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, pp 123 - 144.
37. Goldberger, A. S., and G. G. Cain (1982). “The Causal Analysis of Cognitive Outcomes in the Coleman, Hoffer and Kilgore Report.” Sociology of Education, 55 (2/3): 103-122.
38. Greeley, A. M. (1982). Catholic High Schools and Minority Students. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
39. Greeley, Andrew (1999a). “The So-Called Failure of Catholic Schools.” Phi Delta Kappan, 80 (1): 24 - 25.
40. Greeley, Andrew (1999b). “More Assertions Not Backed by Data.” Phi Delta Kappan, 80 (6): 463.
41. Greene, Jay (2001). “An Evaluation of the Florida A-Plus Accountability and School Choice Program.” New York: Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Center for Civic Innovation.
42. Greene, Jay P., Paul E. Peterson, and Jiangtao Du (1996). “The Effectiveness of School Choice in Milwaukee: A Secondary Analysis of Data from the Program’s Evaluation.” Paper prepared for presentation before the Panel on the Political Analysis of Urban School Systems, American Political Science Association, San Francisco, CA, August 30.
43. Hanushek, Eric, and John Kain (1972). “Opportunity’ On the Value of ‘Equality of Educational as a Guide to Public Policy.” In On Equality of Educational Opportunity, edited by Frederick Mosteller and Daniel Moynihan. New York: Random House, pp. 116-145.
44. Harkavy, Ira (1998). “School-Community-University Partnerships: Effectively Integrating Community Building and Education Reform.” Paper presented at the conference on Connecting Community Building and Education Reform: Effective School, Community, University Partnerships, Washington, DC, January 8.
45. Henig, Jeffrey (1996). “The Local Dynamics of Choice: Ethnic Preferences and Institutional Responses.” In Who Chooses? Who Loses? Culture, Institutions, and the Unequal Effects of School Choice, edited by B. Fuller and R. Elmore. New York: Teachers College Press, pp. 95 - 117.
46. Hirschman, Albert (1970). Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47. Howell, William, et al. (2000). “Test Score Effects of School Vouchers in Dayton, Ohio, New York City, and Washington, D.C.: Evidence From Randomized Field Trials.” Paper prepared for the American Political Science Association meeting, September.
48. Hoxby, Carolyn (2001). “How School Choice Affects the Achievement of Public School Students.” Cambridge, MA: Department of Economics, Harvard University
49. Jencks, Christopher (1966). “Is the Public School Obsolete?” Public Interest, 2, Winter: 18 - 27.
50. Jencks, Christopher (1985). “How Much Do High School Students Learn?” Sociology of Education, 58: 128 - 35.
51. Jepsen, Christopher (2000). “The Private Schooling Market and Its Effects on Student Achievement.” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Northwestern University.
52. Kirkpatrick, David W. (1990). Choice in Schooling: A Case for Tuition Vouchers. Chicago: Loyola University Press.
53. Lee, V., R. Croninger, and J. Smith (1996). “Equity and Choice in Detroit.” In Who Chooses? Who Loses? Culture, Institutions, and the Unequal Effects of School Choice, edited by B. Fuller and R. Elmore. New York: Teachers College Press, pp. 70 - 94.
54. Levin, Henry M. (1998). “Accelerated Schools: A Decade of Evolution.” In International Handbook of Educational Change, edited by Andy Hargreaves et al. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 807 -830.
55. Lips, Carrie (2000). “Edupreneurs: A Survey of For-profit Education.” Policy Analysis, No. 386, November.
56. Loeb, Susanna, and Marianne Page (1998). “Examining the Link between Wages and Quality in the Teacher Workforce: The Role of Alternative Labor Market Opportunities and Non-pecuniary Variation,” Department of Economics, University of California-Davis (mimeo).
57. Martinez, V., K. Godwin, and F. Kemerer (1996). “Public School Choice in San Antonio: Who Chooses and with What Effects?” In Who Chooses? Who Loses? Culture, Institutions, and the Unequal Effects of School Choice, edited by B. Fuller and R. Elmore. New York: Teachers College Press, pp. 50-69.
58. Mayer, Daniel, et al. (2002). School Choice in New York City after Three Years: An Evaluation of the School Choice Scholarships Program. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.
59. McEwan, Patrick, and Martin Carnoy (2000). “The Effectiveness and Efficiency of Private Schools in Chile’s Voucher System.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22 (3 Fall).
60. Metcalf, Kim (2001). Cleveland Scholarship Program Evaluation: 1998-2000 Technical Report. Bloomington, IN: Indiana Center for Evaluation.
61. Moe, Terry (2001). A Primer on America's Schools. Stanford, CA: Hoover Press.
62. Murnane, Richard J. (1984). “A Review Essay-Comparisons of Public and Private Schools: Lessons from the Uproar.” Journal of Human Resources, 19:263 -277.
63. Nathan, Joe (1996). Charter Schools. Creating Hope and Opportunity for American Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
64. Neal, Derek (1997). “The Effect of Catholic Secondary Schooling on Educational Attainment.” Journal of Labor Economics, 15: 98 - 123.
65. Noell, J. (1982). “Public and Catholic Schools: A Reanalysis of Public and Private Schools.” Journal of Sociology of Education, 55: 123 - 132.
66. Perelman, Lewis (1992). School's Out. New York: William Morrow.
67. Public Policy Forum (2002). “Choice schools enroll fewer KY students.” Research Brief, vol. 90, no 1, January 23. (Milwaukee, WI).
68. Ravitch, Diane (1974). The Great School Wars. New York: Basic Books.
69. Rose, Lowell, and Alec Gallup (2001). “The 33rd Annual Phi Delta Kappa/Gallup Poll of the Public’s Attitudes toward the Public Schools.” Phi Delta Kappan, 83 (1): 41-72.
70. Rouse, Cecilia (1998a). “Private School Vouchers and Student Achievement: Evidence from the Milwaukee Choice Program.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(2): 553 -602.
71. Rouse, Cecilia (1998b). “Schools and Student Achievement: More Evidence from the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program.” Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic Policy Review, 4 (1) : 61 - 76.
72. Rumberger, R. (1996). “Dropping out of Middle School: A Multilevel Analysis of Students and Schools.” American Educational Research Journal, 32 (3): 583 -625.
73. Salganik, L. H., and N. Karweit (1982). “Voluntarism and Governance in Education.” Sociology of Education, 55: 152 - 161.
74. Sander, William (1996). “Catholic Grade Schools and Academic Achievement.” Journal of Human Resources, 31:540-548.
75. Sander, William (2001). “The Effect of Catholic Schools on Religiosity, Achievement and Competition.” National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education, Teachers College, Columbia University, Occasional Paper No. 32.
76. Scott, W. R., and Meyer, J. W. (1988) “Environmental Linkages and Organizational Complexity: Public and Private Schools.” In Comparing Public and Private Schools, Vol. 1: Institutions and Organizations, edited by T. James and H. M. Levin. Philadelphia: Falmer Press, pp. 128 - 160.
77. Talbert, J. E. (1988). “Conditions of Public and Private School Organization and Notions of Effective Schools.” In Comparing Public and Private Schools, Vol. 1: Institutions and Organizations, edited by T. James and H. M. Levin. Philadelphia: Falmer Press, pp. 161-188.
78. Thernstrom, Stephan, and Abigail Thernstrom (1998). America in Black and White. New York: Simon and Schuster.
79. Tyack, David (1974). The One Best System. A History of American Urban Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
80. U.S. Department of Education (2001). Private School Universe Survey: 1999-2000. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
81. U.S. Department of Education (1999). Digest of Education Statistics. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
82. Viadero, Debra (2002). “Voucher Plans’ Test Data Yield Puzzling Trends,” Education Week, 21, 24 (February 27): 5.
83. Wallis, Claudia (1994). “A Class of Their Own,” Time, October 31, p. 57.
84. Wells, Amy Stuart (1999). “California’s Charter Schools: Promises vs. Performance.” American Educator, 23 (1): 18 – 21, 24, 52.
85. Williams, Joe (2000). “Choice May Draw 10,000 Students in Fall; 22 New Schools Will Join Voucher Program for Next School Year, DPI Announces.” Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, May 16.
86. Willms, J. Douglas (1984). Public and Private School Outcomes: Results from the High School and Beyond Follow-up Study. Stanford, CA: Institute for Research on Educational Finance and Governance, School of Education, Stanford University.
87. Willms, J. Douglas (1987). “Patterns of Academic Achievement in Public and Private Schools: Implications for Public Policy and Future Research.” In Comparing Public and Private Schools. Volume 2: School Achievement, edited by E. H. Haertel, T. James, and H. M. Levin. New York: Falmer Press, pp. 113-134.
88. Witte, John F. (1992). “Private School versus Public School Achievement: Are There Findings That Should Affect the Educational Choice Debate?” Economics of Education Review, 11:371 -394.
89. Witte, John (1996). “Who Benefits from the Milwaukee Choice Program.” In Who Chooses? Who Loses? Culture, Institutions and the Unequal Effects of School Choice, edited by B. Fuller and R. Elmore. New York: Teachers College Press, pp. 118-137.
90. Witte, John F. (1997). “Reply to Greene, Peterson and Du: ‘The Effectiveness of School Choice in Milwaukee: A Secondary Analysis of Data from the Program’s Evaluation.’ ” http://www.harvard.edu/pepg/op/evaluate.htm.
91. Witte, John F., Troy D. Sterr, and Christopher A. Thorn (1995). “Fifth Year Report: Milwaukee Parental Choice Program.” Madison, WI: Department of Political Science and the Robert M. La Follette Center for Public Affairs, University of Wisconsin.
92. Zunz, Olivier (1982). The Changing Face of Inequality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.